Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Inlet Boundary Conditions for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulation Using OpenFOAM

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Thermofluids

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 639 Accesses

Abstract

The atmospheric boundary layer has been extensively studied by using computational fluid dynamics. The simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer has been conducted either by solving RANS equation or by LES simulation. LES simulation provides higher accuracy in the result but with a very high computational cost. Due to this higher cost in computational effort, RANS turbulence modelling has been preferred by most of the researchers. In Computational fluid dynamics, the role of inlet conditions is more important for any simulation problem. In this study, a comparative analysis has been conducted using open source CFD tool OpenFoam for different inlet boundary conditions for the atmospheric boundary layer. Horizontal homogeneity is a very keen factor while simulating the atmospheric boundary layer. The analysis has been conducted by taking the inlet and outlet profiles of velocity, turbulent dissipation rate, and turbulent kinetic energy. Analysis with different turbulence model constants was also conducted and the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Richards PJ, Younis BA (1990) Comments on “prediction of the wind-generated pressure distribution around buildings” by E.H. Mathews. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 34(1):107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J (2007) CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ 41(2):238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hargreaves DM, Wright NG (2007) On the use of the k–ε model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95(5):355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hargreaves DM, Wright NG (2006) The use of commercial CFD software to model the atmospheric boundary layer. CWE 14(2006):797–800

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richards PJ, Hoxey RP (1993) Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ϵ turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1(46):145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Y, Gu M, Chen S, Jin X (2009) New inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in computational wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97(2):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Toparlar Y, Blocken B, Maiheu B, van Heijst G (2019) CFD simulation of the near-neutral atmospheric boundary layer: new temperature inlet profile consistent with wall functions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1(191):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Han Y, Stoellinger M, Naughton J (2016) Large eddy simulation for atmospheric boundary layer flow over flat and complex terrains. J Phys Conf Ser 753(3):032044

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lakshman R, Basak R (2018) Analysis of transformed fifth order polynomial curve for the contraction of wind tunnel by using OpenFOAM. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 377(1):012048

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lakshman R, Basak R (2020) Analysis of transformed sixth-order polynomial for the contraction wall profile by using OpenFOAM. In: Recent advances in theoretical, applied, computational and experimental mechanics 2020. Springer, Singapore, pp. 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peralta C, Nugusse H, Kokilavani SP, Schmidt J, Stoevesandt B (2014) Validation of the simpleFoam (RANS) solver for the atmospheric boundary layer in complex terrain. In: ITM web of conferences 2014, vol 2. EDP Sciences, p 01002

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenshields CJ (2015) OpenFOAM—the open source CFD toolbox—user guide. OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Lakshman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lakshman, R., Pal, N., Basak, R. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Inlet Boundary Conditions for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulation Using OpenFOAM. In: Revankar, S., Sen, S., Sahu, D. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Thermofluids. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7831-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7831-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7830-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7831-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics