Abstract
The atmospheric boundary layer has been extensively studied by using computational fluid dynamics. The simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer has been conducted either by solving RANS equation or by LES simulation. LES simulation provides higher accuracy in the result but with a very high computational cost. Due to this higher cost in computational effort, RANS turbulence modelling has been preferred by most of the researchers. In Computational fluid dynamics, the role of inlet conditions is more important for any simulation problem. In this study, a comparative analysis has been conducted using open source CFD tool OpenFoam for different inlet boundary conditions for the atmospheric boundary layer. Horizontal homogeneity is a very keen factor while simulating the atmospheric boundary layer. The analysis has been conducted by taking the inlet and outlet profiles of velocity, turbulent dissipation rate, and turbulent kinetic energy. Analysis with different turbulence model constants was also conducted and the results are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Richards PJ, Younis BA (1990) Comments on “prediction of the wind-generated pressure distribution around buildings” by E.H. Mathews. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 34(1):107–110
Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J (2007) CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ 41(2):238–252
Hargreaves DM, Wright NG (2007) On the use of the k–ε model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95(5):355–369
Hargreaves DM, Wright NG (2006) The use of commercial CFD software to model the atmospheric boundary layer. CWE 14(2006):797–800
Richards PJ, Hoxey RP (1993) Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ϵ turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1(46):145–153
Yang Y, Gu M, Chen S, Jin X (2009) New inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in computational wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97(2):88–95
Toparlar Y, Blocken B, Maiheu B, van Heijst G (2019) CFD simulation of the near-neutral atmospheric boundary layer: new temperature inlet profile consistent with wall functions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1(191):91–102
Han Y, Stoellinger M, Naughton J (2016) Large eddy simulation for atmospheric boundary layer flow over flat and complex terrains. J Phys Conf Ser 753(3):032044
Lakshman R, Basak R (2018) Analysis of transformed fifth order polynomial curve for the contraction of wind tunnel by using OpenFOAM. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 377(1):012048
Lakshman R, Basak R (2020) Analysis of transformed sixth-order polynomial for the contraction wall profile by using OpenFOAM. In: Recent advances in theoretical, applied, computational and experimental mechanics 2020. Springer, Singapore, pp. 133–144
Peralta C, Nugusse H, Kokilavani SP, Schmidt J, Stoevesandt B (2014) Validation of the simpleFoam (RANS) solver for the atmospheric boundary layer in complex terrain. In: ITM web of conferences 2014, vol 2. EDP Sciences, p 01002
Greenshields CJ (2015) OpenFOAM—the open source CFD toolbox—user guide. OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lakshman, R., Pal, N., Basak, R. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Inlet Boundary Conditions for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulation Using OpenFOAM. In: Revankar, S., Sen, S., Sahu, D. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Thermofluids. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7831-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7831-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7830-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7831-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)