Skip to main content

Ethnic Minority Youth as Digital Cultural Participants: Toward a Critical Indicator Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Media Spectacles and Multimodal Creativity in a Globalised Asia

Part of the book series: Digital Culture and Humanities ((DICUHU,volume 3))

Abstract

Theories of cultural planning and sustainability highlight cultural capacity building as the fourth pillar of sustainability, alongside social, economic, and environmental aims, and integration as a new framework for combining these four pillars. Seeing cultural participation as the core of the complex puzzle, we regard the digitization of art and media as an engine for changing the dynamics of participatory culture. Further, digitization rearticulates the power relations between cultural infrastructures (production) and cultural access and participation (consumption). This chapter examines the dynamics of online digital cultural participation by ethnic minority (EM) youth in Hong Kong. By analyzing a questionnaire survey data set of EM youth in Hong Kong (N = 561), we demonstrate the various capacities and aspirations of cultural activities online among ethnic minority youth. The data were collected via local community networks of social workers and social enterprises. The sample covers diverse ethnic minority groups in Hong Kong, such as Indonesians, Filipinos, Indians, Pakistanis, Nepalese, and others. A typology of digital cultural capacity will be attempted using a descriptive analysis to show the EM youth’s access and participation in cultural, arts, and leisure activities on the Internet, controlled by demographic background variables such as gender, age, and class. Our core argument is that baseline digital capacity established above is complicated by EM youth’s Community Capacity, i.e. education/information attainment; capacity of engaging social agencies that hold power; Social Capital, i.e. resources and networks embodied in life domains such as school, family, friendship, work, and ethnic community cohesion; and Cultural Identity, i.e. self-recognition/respect and intra- and inter-ethnic identity negotiation and development. Our discussion, with these tiers of indicators, provides critical insights into EM youth’s participation in online cultural activities and the barriers to their inter-cultural integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(4), 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashtiani, M., & Feliciano, C. (2015). Access and mobilization: How social capital relates to low-income youth’s postsecondary educational (PSE) attainment. Youth & Society, 50(4), 439–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australia Council for the Arts. (2000). Arts in a multicultural Australia. Sydney: Australia Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Arts and culture in Australia: A statistical overview. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badham, M. (2009). Cultural indicators: Tools for community engagement? The International Journal of the Arts in Society, 3(5), 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfe, J. (2003). Public participation in the arts and culture. In V. Morris & D. Pankratz (Eds.), The arts in a new millennium: Research and the arts sector (pp.51–63). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, S., Williams, K., & Dong, W. (2010). Audience 2.0: How technology influences arts participation (Research Report #50). Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://arts.gov/publications/audience-20-how-technology-influences-arts-participation

  • Behtoui, A., & Neergaard, A. (2012). Social capital, status and income attainment in the workplace. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(1/2), 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhugra, D., Bhui, K., Mallett, R., Desal, M., Singh, J., & Leff, J. (1999). Cultural identity and its measurement: A questionnaire for Asians. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 244–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education (pp. 241–260). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwood, A., & Skelton, A. (2000). The arts in England: Developing a survey of attendance, participation and attitudes. Cultural Trends, 10(40), 47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. S., & Williams, D. R. (1993). Understanding the role of ethnicity in outdoor recreation experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 25, 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catterall, J. S., Dumais, S. A., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). The arts and achievement in at-risk youth: Findings from four longitudinal studies (Research Report 55). National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530822.pdf

  • Census and Statistics Department. (2016). Population by-census – Thematic report: Ethnic minorities. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong S.A.R. Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review, 72, 512–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes. (2007). Encuesta de Consumo Cultural 2004–2005. Retrieved from https://www.mcu.es/libro/docs/MC/CD/ENCUESTA_CULTURA_CHILE.pdf

  • Couldry, N. (2006). Culture and citizenship: The missing link. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2017, May). Cultural participation and inclusive societies. A thematic report based on the Indicator Framework on Culture and Democracy. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/cultural-participation-and-inclusive-societies-a-thematic-report-based/1680711283

  • Delaney, L., & Keaney, E. (2006). Cultural participation, social capital and civil renewal in the United Kingdom: Statistical evidence from national and international survey data. Dublin and London: Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), and Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erni, J. N. (2012). Who needs strangers? Un-imagining Hong Kong Chineseness. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erni, J. N. (2018). “用文化研究跟少數族裔同行.” 《行出一小步——從我到我們的社區實驗》 (作者:一小步). 香港: 突破出版社 (pp. 86–93).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erni, J. N. (2019). Racialism. In S. Chu (Ed.), Hong Kong keywords (pp. 233–244). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erni, J. N., & Leung, L. (2014). Understanding South Asian minorities in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. M. (2006). Social capital and children’s wellbeing: A critical synthesis of the international social capital literature. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(1), 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, M. F., & Gramann, J. H. (1993). Effects of acculturation and structural assimilation in resource-based recreation: The case of Mexican Americans. Journal of Leisure Research, 25, 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, S. M. (2018). Social capital in the creation of cultural capital, habitus, and achievement: Access vs. mobilization for low-income and racial minority adolescents. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161606

  • Gesthuizen, M., Van der Meer, T., & Scheepers, P. (2009). Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe: Tests of Putnam’s thesis in European countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(2), 121–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Arts Development Council. (2000). Public attitude on art (Arts poll 2000). Hong Kong: Arts Development Council. Retrieved from https://www.hkadc.org.hk/en/content/web.do?id=ff80818123dbba560123dbfd53e9001b

  • Hong Kong Arts Development Council. (2005). Hong Kong arts and cultural indicator. Hong Kong: Arts Development Council, International Intelligence on Culture, Cultural Capital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, R. (1988). A critique of race, ethnicity, and social class in recent leisure-recreation research. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 10–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowell, T. (2004). Government and the value of culture. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaganis, J. (2007). Structures of participation in digital culture. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitio, T. (2012). Counting what counts: Report on the Culture Watch Europe conference on cultural access and participation—From indicators to policies for democracy, Helsinki, June 30, 2012. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/cwe/HelsinkiReport_en.pdf

  • Laurence, J. (2011). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multilevel analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review, 27, 70–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoux, K., & Bernadska, A. (2014). Impact of the arts on individual contributions to US civil society. Journal of Civil Society, 10(2), 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, C. (2005). Indicators for arts and cultural policy: A global perspective. Cultural Trends, 14(3), 217–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. (2002). Towards cultural citizenship: Tools for cultural policy and development. Stockholm: Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation and Gidlunds Forlag, Hedemora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. (2003). From indicators to governance to the mainstream: Tools for cultural policy and citizenship. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200717403_From_Indicators_to_Governance_to_the_Mainstream_Tools_for_Cultural_Policy_and_Citizenship

  • Ministry for Culture and Heritage. (2009). Cultural indicators for New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry for Culture and Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrone, A. (2006). Guidelines for measuring cultural participation. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO-UIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (2008). Conceptualizing social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: A critical review. Sociological Review, 47(4), 744–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Arts Council. (2009). Population survey on the arts 2009. Singapore: National Arts Council. Retrieved from https://www.nac.gov.sg/static/doc/population_survey_of_the_arts_2009.pdf

  • National Endowment for the Arts. (1995). A practical guide to arts participation research. Available at: https://www.arts.gov/publications/practical-guide-arts-participation-research.

  • National Endowment for the Arts. (2009). 2008 survey of public participation in the arts. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://arts.gov/publications/2008-survey-public-participation-arts

  • Ng, S. L., Zhang, Y., Ng, K. H., Wong, H., & Lee, J. W. Y. (2018). Living environments and quality of life in Hong Kong. Asian Geographer, 35, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak-Leonard, J. L., & Brown, A. S. (2011). Beyond attendance: A multi-modal understanding of arts participation. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.giarts.org/sites/default/files/beyond-attendance-multi-modal-understanding-of-arts-participation%20.pdf

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oustinoff, M. (2012). Les langues sur internet: De l'hégémonie de l'Anglais au règne de la traduction. Le Temps des médias 18(1), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E., & Warde, A. (Eds.). (2010). Cultural analysis and Bourdieu’s legacy: Settling accounts and developing alternatives. Culture, economy and the social. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • South China Morning Post. (2018, October 31). Hong Kong must show it is home to all races. Editorial. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Research and Training Institute. (2011). Survey on time use and leisure activities 2001–2008. Japan: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/7657753/gbdki/97

  • TNS Opinion & Social. (2013). Cultural access and participation (Special eurobarometer 399). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Uganda national household survey 2009/2010. Kampala: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ubos.org/UNHS0910/Appendix%20III-%20Questionnaire.pdf

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2012). Segregation and mistrust: Diversity, isolation, and social cohesion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wel, F., Couwenbergh-Soeterboek, N., Couwenbergh, C., ter Bogt, T., & Raaijmakers, Q. (2006). Ethnicity, youth cultural participation and cultural reproduction in the Netherlands. Poetics, 34(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (1980). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, A. (2018, May 20). Ethnic minorities are Hong Kongers too, and should be treated as such. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, A., & Khan, R. (2015). New approaches to cultural measurement: On cultural value, cultural participation and cultural diversity. In L. MacDowall, M. Bardham, & E. Blomkamp (Eds.), Making culture count: The politics of cultural measurement. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, A., Khan, R., & Brook, S. (2011). Developing a local cultural indicator framework in Australia: A case study of the city of Whittlesea. Journal of Culture and Local Governance, 3(1–2), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2015). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1007–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a General Research Grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. HKBU12660516).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Nguyet Erni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erni, J.N., Zhang, N.Y. (2020). Ethnic Minority Youth as Digital Cultural Participants: Toward a Critical Indicator Study. In: Lam, S.Sk. (eds) New Media Spectacles and Multimodal Creativity in a Globalised Asia . Digital Culture and Humanities, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7341-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics