Skip to main content

Abstract

One of the main problems faced by manufacturing companies in the production sequencing, also called scheduling, which consists of identifying the best way to order the production program on the machines for improving efficiency. This paper presents the integration of a simulation model with an optimization method to solve the problem of dynamic programming with stochastic demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Iassinovski S, Artiba A, Bachelet V (2003) Integration of simulation and optimization for solving complex decision-making problems. Int J Prod Econ 85(1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00082-3, http://www.issn.org/0925-5273

  2. Hamid M, Hamid M, Musavi M, Azadeh A (2019) Scheduling elective patients based on sequence-dependent setup times in an open-heart surgical department using an optimization and simulation approach. Simulation 95(12):1141–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang B, Yi L-X, Xiao S (2005) Study of stochastic job shop dynamic scheduling. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, Guangzhou, China, pp 18–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang B, Xu L, Zhang J (2020) A multi-objective cellular genetic algorithm for energy-oriented balancing and sequencing problem of mixed-model assembly line. J Clean Prod 244:118845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banks J (2000) Introduction to simulation. In: Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, Orlando, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohammadi A, Asadi H, Mohamed S, Nelson K, Nahavandi S (2018) Optimizing model predictive control horizons using genetic algorithm for motion cueing algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 92:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keshanchi B, Souri A, Navimipour NJ (2017) An improved genetic algorithm for task scheduling in the cloud environments using the priority queues: formal verification, simulation, and statistical testing. J Syst Softw 124:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silva EB, Costa MG, Silva MFS (2014) Simulation study of dispatching rules in stochastic job shop dynamic scheduling. World J Modell Simul 10(3):231–240. http://www.issn.org/1746-7233

  9. Mosadegh H, Ghomi SF, Süer GA (2020) Stochastic mixed-model assembly line sequencing problem: Mathematical modeling and Q-learning based simulated annealing hyper-heuristics. Eur J Oper Res 282(2):530–544

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Leal F, Costa RFS, Montevechi JAB (2011) A practical guide for operational validation of discrete simulation models. Pesquisa Operacional 31(1):57–77. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382011000100005, http://www.issn.org/0101-7438

  11. Kelton WD, Sadowski RP, Sadowski DA (2000) Simulation with ARENA, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, Boston, USA, pp 385–396. ISBN: 978-0071122399

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp 249–273. http://www.issn.org/978-0070428072

  13. Wall M (1996) GALIB: A C++ library of genetic algorithm components. Mechanical Engineering Departament, Massachussetts Institute of Technology. http://lancet.mit.edu/ga/dist/

  14. Seghir F, Khababa A (2018) A hybrid approach using genetic and fruit fly optimization algorithms for QoS-aware cloud service composition. J Intell Manuf 29(8):1773–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rauf M, Guan Z, Sarfraz S, Mumtaz J, Shehab E, Jahanzaib M, Hanif M (2020) A smart algorithm for multi-criteria optimization of model sequencing problem in assembly lines. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 61:101844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar M, Khatak P (2020) Development of a discretization methodology for 2.5 D milling toolpath optimization using genetic algorithm. In: Advances in computing and intelligent systems. Springer, Singapore, pp 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rajagopalan A, Modale DR, Senthilkumar R (2020) Optimal scheduling of tasks in cloud computing using hybrid firefly-genetic algorithm. In: Advances in decision sciences, image processing, security and computer vision. Springer, Cham, pp 678–687

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rekha PM, Dakshayini M (2019) Efficient task allocation approach using genetic algorithm for cloud environment. Cluster Comput 22(4):1241–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelec Viloria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Viloria, A. et al. (2021). Genetic System for Project Support with the Sequencing Problem. In: Gunjan, V.K., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Trends in Machine Learning, IoT, Smart Cities and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1245. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7234-0_93

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics