Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1245))

Abstract

Interoperability is a challenging issue faced by IoT developers all over the world. This is due to the fact that the IoT devices currently being used are utilizing a variety of data formats, protocols, and technologies for operation. As currently there are no standardized rules framed for IoT applications, interoperability tools remain limited. This paper focuses on the concept of developing a framework on the principles of interoperability for agriculture-related IoT devices. The proposed framework enables interoperability among heterogeneous devices. The data gathered from different sensors in the farms is semantically annotated and presented in a user-friendly manner. A lightweight semantic annotation model is used to annotate the data. Resource Description Framework (RDF) is used to provide semantic functionality to the data. The proposed framework helps in providing interoperability to the heterogeneous data gathered from IoT devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bongiovanni R, Lowenberg-DeBoer J (2004) Precision agriculture and sustainability. Preci Agricu 5(4):359–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gershenfeld N, Krikorian R, Cohen D (2004) The Internet of Things. Sci Am 291(4):76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor K et al (2013) Farming the web of things. Intell Syst 28(6):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Open Data Aarhus (2016) http://www.odaa.dk

  5. Pfisterer D et al (2011) SPITFIRE: toward a semantic web of things. IEEE Commun Mag 49(11):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lecué F et al (2014) Smart traffic analytics in the semantic web with STAR-CITY: scenarios, system and lessons learned in Dublin City. Web Semant Sci Serv Agents World Wide Web 27:26–33

    Google Scholar 

  7. CityPulse EU FP7 Project (2016) http://www.ict-citypulse.eu/page/

  8. Stuhmer R et al (2013) PLAY: Semantics-based event marketplace. Collaborative Syst Reindustrialization 699–707

    Google Scholar 

  9. senseFly SA (2016) https://www.sensefly.com/

  10. Yan-e D (2011) Design of intelligent agriculture management information system based on IoT. In: Proceedings of ICICTA, pp 1045–1049

    Google Scholar 

  11. Compton M et al (2012) The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. Web Seman Sci Serv Agents World Wide Web 17(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aberer K, Hauswirth M, Salehi A (2006) A middleware for fast and flexible sensor network deployment. In: Proceedings of VLDB. VLDB Endowment, pp 1199–1202

    Google Scholar 

  13. OpenIoT EU FP7 Project (2016) https://github.com/OpenIotOrg

  14. IoT-A EU FP7 Project (2016) http://www.iot-a.eu/public

  15. FIWARE. The FIWARE Catalogue (2016) http://catalogue.fiware.org/

  16. Kamilaris A et al (2011) Bridging the mobile web and the Web of Things in urban environments. In: Proceedings of IoT 2010, first workshop on the urban Internet of Things, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kamilaris A et al (2012) Integrating web-enabled energy-aware smart homes to the smart grid. Int J Adv Intell Syst 5(1)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ThingSpeak (2016) https://thingspeak.com/

  19. freeBoard (2016) https://freeboard.io/

  20. Map your meal Europe Aid funded project (2016) http://www.mapyourmeal.org/

  21. FoodLoop GmbH. FoodLoop (2016) https://www.foodloop.net/en/

  22. Barbieri DF et al (2009) C-SPARQL: SPARQL for continuous querying. In: Proceedings of WWW. ACM, pp 1061–1062

    Google Scholar 

  23. Le-Phuoc D et al (2011) A native and adaptive approach for unified processing of linked streams and linked data. In: Proceedings of ISWC. Springer, Berlin, pp 370–388

    Google Scholar 

  24. W3C. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services (2016) https://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/

  25. FAO. AGROVOC Thesaurus (2009) http://www.taxobank.org/content/agrovoc-thesaurus

  26. Lauser B et al (2006) From AGROVOC to the agricultural ontology service/concept server. An OWL model for creating ontologies in the agricultural domain. In: Dublin Core conference

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hu S et al (2010) AgOnt: ontology for agriculture internet of things. In: Computer and computing technologies in agriculture IV. Springer, Berlin, pp 131–137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Salma Khatoon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khatoon, P.S., Ahmed, M. (2021). Semantic Interoperability for IoT Agriculture Framework with Heterogeneous Devices. In: Gunjan, V.K., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Trends in Machine Learning, IoT, Smart Cities and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1245. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7234-0_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics