Skip to main content

Technical Efficiency in Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resources Use Efficiency in Agriculture

Abstract

Resource limitations in the agricultural sector for achieving food production is one of the most critical challenges for planners and policymakers in many countries including Iran. Optimal use of available resources is one of the ways to overcome these limitations. This study aims to investigate the factors affecting technical efficiency of resource use in the agricultural sector. Classic Regression Robust (CLR) and Two Limit Tobit (TLT), M, MM and S regression were used to explore the effects of estimation techniques and study characteristics on Mean Technical Efficiency (MTE) level. The results are based on a total of 55 studies covering the 1994–2015 period. The econometric results indicate that year of publication, agronomic production, the functional form assumed for estimation (such as Stochastic Frontier production Function, Cobb–Douglas and Translog function) have a positive effect on the estimated MTE. On the other hand, livestock production, sample size and some model variables and cross-section have an adverse impact. Farms with livestock production have their MTE lowered by 0.03–0.06 units. Similarly, farms located in cold and humid climate regions had a lower MTE by 0.08–0.12 units. However, studies for the cold and mountainous regions reported higher MTE by 0.03–0.06. According to research results, we suggest that to achieve an overall result, policymakers and researchers can use Meta-regression analysis along with other models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ATE:

Average technical efficiency

CLR:

Classic regression robust

DEA:

Data envelopment analysis

MMR:

MM regression

MR:

M regression

MTE:

Mean of technical efficiency

OLS:

Ordinary least squares

SFA:

Stochastic frontier analysis

SR:

S regression

TE:

Technical efficiency

TLT:

Two limit Tobit

References

  • Aigner D, Lovell CK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldaz N, MillÁN JA (2003) Regional productivity of Spanish agriculture in a panel DEA framework. Appl Econ Lett 10(2):87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya T (1973) Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal. Econometrica 15:997–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assaf AG, Josiassen A (2016) Frontier analysis: a state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. J Travel Res 55(5):612–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ureta BE, Solís D, López VHM, Maripani JF, Thiam A, Rivas T (2007) Technical efficiency in farming: a meta-regression analysis. J Prod Anal 27(1):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brümmer B, Glauben T, Lu W (2006) Policy reform and productivity change in Chinese agriculture: a distance function approach. J Dev Econ 81(1):61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dandekar VM (1986) Agriculture, employment and poverty. Econ Polit Weekly 21:A90–A10

    Google Scholar 

  • Djokoto JG, Srofenyo FY, Arthur AAA (2016) Technical inefficiency effects in agriculture—a meta-regression. J Agric Sci 8(2):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner EH (2003) Creating employment in the Middle East and North Africa. International Monetary Fund, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Wang L, Wang H, Wang S (2014) Efficiency evaluation of agricultural informatization based on CCR and super-efficiency DEA model. In: In International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture. Springer, Berlin, pp 240–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Iliyasu A, Mohamed ZA, Ismail MM, Abdullah AM (2014) A meta-analysis of technical efficiency in aquaculture. J Appl Aquacul 26(4):329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iršová Z, Havránek T (2010) Measuring bank efficiency: a meta-regression analysis. Prague Econ Pap 19(4):22–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Huda FA, Alam A (2010) Farm household technical efficiency: a study on rice producers in selected areas of Jamalpur district in Bangladesh. Eur J Soc Sci 14(2):262–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiadaliri AA, Jafari M, Gerdtham U-G (2013) Frontier-based techniques in measuring hospital efficiency in Iran: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 13(1):312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kolawole O (2009) A meta-analysis of technical efficiency in Nigerian agriculture. In: International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China, August, 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Singh MK, Meena RS, Hingonia K (2017) Influence of crop geometry and cultivars on growth, yield and production efficiency of dry direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Appl Nat Sci 9(4):2469–2476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Zhuang L (2000) Determinants of technical efficiency in post-collective Chinese agriculture: evidence from farm-level data. J Comp Econ 28(3):545–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319(5863):607–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mareth T, Thomé AMT, Cyrino Oliveira FL, Scavarda LF (2016) Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of technical efficiency in dairy farms. Int J Prod Perform Mang 65(3):279–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald J (2009) Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. Eur J Oper Res 197(2):792–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meena RS, Bohra JS, Singh SP, Meena VS, Verma JP, Verma SK, Sihag SK (2016) Towards the prime response of manure to enhance nutrient use efficiency and soil sustainability a current need: a book review. J Clean Prod 112(1):1258–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meena RS, Gogoi N, Kumar S (2017) Alarming issues on agricultural crop production and environmental stresses. J Clean Prod 142:3357–3359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meena RS, Mitran T, Kumar S, Yadav GS, Bohra JS, Datta R (2018) Application of remote sensing for sustainable agriculture and forest management. Inform Proc in Agric 5:295–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meena RS, Kumar S, Datta R, Lal R, Vijayakumar V, Brtnicky M, Sharma MP, Yadav GS, Jhariya MK, Jangir CK, Pathan SI, Dokulilova T, Pecina V, Marfo TD (2020) Impact of agrochemicals on soil microbiota and management: a review. Land 9(34):1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9020034

  • Minviel JJ, Latruffe L (2017) Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results. Appl Econ 49(2):213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira López VH, Bravo-Ureta BE (2009) A study of dairy farm technical efficiency using meta-regression: an international perspective. Chil J Agric Res 69:214–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugera A, Ojede A (2014) Technical efficiency in African agriculture: is it catching up or lagging behind? J Int Dev 26(6):779–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulwa R, Emrouznejad A, Muhammad L (2009) Economic efficiency of smallholder maize producers in Western Kenya: a DEA meta-frontier analysis. Int J Oper Res 4(3):250–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi B (2003) Financial valuation and risk factors of industrial livestock insurance in Iran. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Scientific Conference on Agricultural Insurance, Tehran. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak A, Kijek T, Domańska K (2015) Technical efficiency and its determinants in the European Union agriculture. Agric Econ 61(6):275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Odeck J, Bråthen S (2012) A meta-analysis of DEA and SFA studies of the technical efficiency of seaports: a comparison of fixed and random-effects regression models. Trans Res Part A: Policy and Prac 46(10):1574–1585

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogundari K (2013) The paradigm of African agricultural efficiency, 1967–2012: what does meta-analysis reveal? In: 2013 Conference, August 28–30, 2013. New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Christchurch, NZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogundari K (2014) A meta-regression analysis of frontier efficiency estimates from Africa. In: 2014 annual meeting, july 27–29, 2014. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Minneapolis, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogundari K, Brümmer B (2011) Technical efficiency of Nigerian agriculture: a meta-regression analysis. Outlook Agric 40(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogundari K, Amos T, Okoruwa V (2012) A review of Nigerian agricultural efficiency literature, 1999–2011: what does one learn from frontier studies? Afr Dev Rev 24(1):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Păun G, Maţoschi-Cîmpan O, Păun-Ciobanu MC (2012) Economic efficiency in agriculture. Qual-Acc Success 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (2005) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Z-J, Xu Y-Q, Zhang Z-Y (2008) A DEA efficiency analysis of chinese agriculture [J]. J Chongqing Univ (Social Science Edition) 3:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Susanti Y, Pratiwi H (2014) M estimation, S estimation, and MM estimation in robust regression. Inter J Pure Appl Math 91(3):349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiam A, Bravo-Ureta BE, Rivas TE (2001) Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: a meta-analysis. Agric Econ 25(2–3):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verardi V, Croux C (2008) Robust regression in Stata. Stata J 9(3):439–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W (2015) The analysis of the agriculture input and output efficiency based on DEA model. Agric Sci Tech 16(2):414

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suren(dra) Kulshreshtha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghorbani, M., Kulshreshtha, S., Radmehr, R., Habibi, F. (2020). Technical Efficiency in Agriculture. In: Kumar, S., Meena, R.S., Jhariya, M.K. (eds) Resources Use Efficiency in Agriculture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6953-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics