Abstract
This chapter presents the results of an integrative review and synthesis of the literature to identify and evaluate pedagogical strategies with simulation technology that can enhance clinical competence of nursing students. Research studies published from 2006 to 2017 were examined which included either (1) a comparison of participants’ enhancement in clinical competence with that of non-participants in simulation or (2) pedagogical strategies vital for enhancing clinical competence in nursing education. We looked systematically for studies in five databases: CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, ProQuest Education, and ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health. An inductive approach was used to extract critical information for categorisation and synthesis. Eventually, 11 out of the original 261 papers met the criteria for inclusion in this review. The simulation-based learning (SBL) was designed as a group-based learning activity, where students were able to develop one of three roles – ‘Performer’, ‘Observer’, or ‘Partner’ – with respective responsibilities to enhance clinical competence. Specific pedagogical approaches should be deployed in the three phases of the simulation that can accommodate nursing students’ learning needs. The review identified critical pedagogies of SBL delivery, with assigned roles for students, to enhance clinical competence as an agenda for future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
13 November 2020
Correction to: Chapter 22 in: K. C. Li et al. (eds.), Innovating Education in Technology-Supported Environments, Education Innovation Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6591-5
References
Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). The effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(3), 359–369.
Badir, A., Zeybekoglu, Z., Karacay, P., Goktepe, N., Topcu, S., Yalcin, B., et al. (2015). Using high-fidelity simulation as a learning strategy in an undergraduate intensive care course. Nurse Educator, 40(2), E1–E6.
Beckers, K. L., Rose, L. E., Berg, J. B., Park, H., & Shatzer, J. H. (2006). The teaching effectiveness of standardized patients. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(4), 103–111.
Bruce, R., Levett-Jones, T., & Courtney-Pratt, H. (2019). Transfer of learning from university-based simulation experiences to nursing students’ future clinical practice: An exploratory study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 35, 17–24.
Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2010). Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(1), 3–15.
Coffman, S. (2012). From static lab to simulation lab: Students reflect on their learning. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8, e335–e340.
Cook, D. A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., et al. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Association, 306(9), 978–988.
Donovan, L. M., & Mullen, L. K. (2019). Expanding nursing simulation programs with a standardized patient protocol on therapeutic communication. Nurse Education in Practice, 38, 126–131.
Hoffmann, R. L., O’Donnell, J. M., & Kim, Y. (2007). The effects of human patient simulators on basic knowledge in critical care nursing with undergraduate senior baccalaureate nursing students. Simulation in Healthcare, 2, 110–114.
Hustad, J., Johannesen, B., Fossum, M., & Hovland, O. J. (2019). Nursing students’ transfer of learning outcomes from simulation-based training to clinical practice: A focus-group study. BMC Nursing, 18.
Kaplan, B., & Ura, D. (2010). Use of multiple patient simulators to enhance prioritizing and delegating skills for senior nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(7), 371–379.
Kennedy, D. M., Jewell, J. J., & Hickey, J. E. (2020). Male nursing students’ experiences of simulation used to replace maternal-child clinical learning in Qatar. Nurse Education Today, 84, 104235.
Ko, E., & Kim, H. Y. (2014). Effects of multi-mode simulation learning on nursing students’ critical thinking disposition, problem-solving process, and clinical competence. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 26(1), 107–116.
Leigh, G. T. (2008). High fidelity patient simulation and nursing students’ self-efficacy: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1–17.
Meyer, M. N., Connors, H., Hou, Q., & Gajewski, B. (2011). The effect of simulation on clinical performance. Simulation in Healthcare, 6, 269–277.
Mikkelsen, J., Reime, M. H., & Harris, A. K. (2008). Nursing students’ learning of managing. Education Today, 28, 664–671.
Mill, J., West, C., Langtree, T., Usher, K., Herny, R., Chamberlain-Salaun, J., et al. (2014). Putting it together: Unfolding case studies and high-fidelity simulation in the first-year of an undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurse Education in Practice, 14, 12–17.
Pitt, V., Powis, D., Levett-Jones, T., & Hunter, S. (2012). Factors influencing nursing students’ academic and clinical performance and attrition: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 32, 903–913.
Swenty, C. F., & Eggleston, B. M. (2011). The evaluation of simulation in a baccalaureate nursing program. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7, e181–e187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, S.L., Wu, C.S.T., Suen, L.K.P. (2020). Pedagogical Strategies with Simulation Technology to Enhance Clinical Competence in Nursing Education. In: Li, K.C., Tsang, E.Y.M., Wong, B.T.M. (eds) Innovating Education in Technology-Supported Environments. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6591-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6591-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6590-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6591-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)