Skip to main content

Internal Fixation Versus External Fixation in Orthopaedic Implantology

Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology

Abstract

Multiple fracture fixation options are available to the orthopaedic surgeon today. These fixations have different indications, hardware, and biomechanics. External fixation is a versatile alternative that allows a swift application in emergency settings and is of great aid in reconstruction procedures such as distraction osteogenesis. Among external fixation constructs, monoplanar, modular, and circular fixations are the most widely known and frequently used in day-to-day practice. Internal fixation has evolved to provide implants that may be used in a wide array of clinical situations depending on fracture stability requirements. This allows the surgeon to treat patients appropriately. Internal fixation implants include interfragmentary screws, plates, and intramedullary nails, among other choices.

The knowledge on how to correctly use external or internal fixation is fundamental to offer the best possible outcome to trauma patients. This chapter focuses on the understanding of each fixation method and how these alternatives interact during the treatment of complex fracture patterns and how they might best be used to our advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ziran BH, Smith WR, Anglen JO, Tornetta Iii P. External fixation: how to make it work. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:37–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayden BL, Theriault R, Bramlett K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of trauma patients treated with contemporary external fixation devices: a multicenter case series. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11):e375–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giannoudis PV. Surgical priorities in damage control in polytrauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(4):478–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moss DP, Tejwani NC. Biomechanics of external fixation: a review of the literature. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007;65(4):294–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ktistakis I, Guerado E, Giannoudis PV. Pin-site care: can we reduce the incidence of infections? Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 3):S35–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadeed A, Werntz RL, Varacallo M. External fixation principles and overview. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Haidukewych GJ. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(5):296–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckley Richard E, Moran Christopher GAT. AO principles of fracture management. 3rd ed. Thieme; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cui X, Chen H, Rui Y, Niu Y, Li H. Two-stage open reduction and internal fixation versus limited internal fixation combined with external fixation: a meta-analysis of postoperative complications in patients with severe Pilon fractures. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(7):2525–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Diwan A, Eberlin KR, Smith RM. The principles and practice of open fracture care, 2018. Chin J Traumatol. 2018;21(4):187–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hao Z-C, et al. Treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures by external fixation combined with limited internal fixation versus simple external fixation: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bosse MJ, et al. An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(24):1924–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao XW, Ma JX, Ma XL, et al. A meta-analysis of external fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. Int J Surg. 2017;39:65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wardle B, Eslick GD, Sunner P. Internal versus external fixation of the anterior component in unstable fractures of the pelvic ring: pooled results from a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(5):635–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastián Irarrázaval .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Donoso, R., Samundeeswari, S., Irarrázaval, S. (2023). Internal Fixation Versus External Fixation in Orthopaedic Implantology. In: Banerjee, A., Biberthaler, P., Shanmugasundaram, S. (eds) Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_6-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_6-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6278-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6278-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Internal Fixation versus External Fixation in Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology
    Published:
    04 August 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_6-4

  2. Internal Fixation versus External Fixation in Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology
    Published:
    15 July 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_6-3

  3. Internal Fixation Versus External Fixation in Orthopaedic Implantology
    Published:
    14 April 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_6-2

  4. Original

    Internal Fixation Versus External Fixation in Orthopedic Implantology
    Published:
    18 June 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_6-1