Skip to main content

Assessment on Average Participation Versus Bialek’s Methods for Transmission Usage Evaluation Scheme

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Embracing Industry 4.0

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 678))

  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, most developing countries have been moved toward the energy restructuring market. There have several primaries in energy elements within this deregulation scheme which are power generation, transmission, and distribution firms. One of the problems that arise with respect to transmission utility is the development of a fair and equitable methodology for the price of transmission that already used by consumers. An effective method of transmission price assessment is an important framework that needs to be built in the transmission pricing methodology in order to solve the problem that arises in the transmission pricing. Next, a direct current load flow (DCLF) approach needs to be used to define the network power flow for each line. By using the Power World Simulator software, the results using the DCLF approach that was used in this research was been specified accurately and correctly. the power contribution for each transmission line that used it either generation or distribution line will be identifiable to ease and solve problems that arise in this transmission pricing. The method that was used to investigate this problem using in this research is Average Participation and Bialek’s methods. In order to investigate the problem that arises in the transmission pricing issues, Average Participation and Bialek’s methods were used in this research to solve the problem. For the case study, used IEEE 14 bus systems and the simulation has been carried out using the Matlab software. Then, the results for Average Participation and Bialek’s methods were compared for identifying and determining the best approach in this transmission usage evaluation scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hakvoort R (2000) Technology and restructuring the electricity market, April, pp 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirst E, Kirby B (2001) Transmission planning for a restructuring U.S. electricity industry, June

    Google Scholar 

  3. Green R (1997) Electricity transmission pricing: an international comparison. Util Policy 6(3):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao MSS, Soman SA, Chitkara P, Gajbhiye RK, Hemachandra N, Menezes BL (2010) Min-max fair power flow tracing for transmission system usage cost allocation: a large system perspective. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(3):1457–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Junqueira M, da Costa LC, Barroso LA, Oliveira GC, Thomé LM, Pereira MV (2007) An Aumann-Shapley approach to allocate transmission service cost among network users in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(4):1532–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Murali M, Kumari MS, Sydulu M (2013) An overview of transmission pricing methods in a pool based power market. Int J Adv Sci Eng Technol 6–11. ISSN 2321-9009

    Google Scholar 

  7. Orfanos GA, Tziasiou GT, Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND (2011) Evaluation of transmission pricing methodologies for pool based electricity markets. In: 2011 IEEE PES Trondheim PowerTech Power Technol a Sustain Soc POWERTECH 2011, vol 218903, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hogan WW (2014) Markets and electricity restructuring transmission expansion

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pan J, Teklu Y, Rahman S, Jun K (2000) Review of usage-based transmission cost allocation methods under open access, vol 15, no 4, pp 1218–1224

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anjaneyulu V, NarasimhaRao PV, Prakash KNSD (2013) Fixed transmission cost allocation using power flow tracing methods. Int J Adv Res Electr Electron Instrum Eng 2(8):3895–3904

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srikanth P, Rajendra O, Yesuraj A, Tilak M, Raja K (2013) Load flow analysis of IEEE 14 bus system using MATLAB. Int J Eng Res Technol 2(5):149–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia through TIER 1 grant vot H156.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. H. Radzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ahmad, N.S., Radzi, N.H., Jumaat, S.A., Abdullah, M.N., Salimin, S. (2020). Assessment on Average Participation Versus Bialek’s Methods for Transmission Usage Evaluation Scheme. In: Mohd Razman, M., Mat Jizat, J., Mat Yahya, N., Myung, H., Zainal Abidin, A., Abdul Karim, M. (eds) Embracing Industry 4.0. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 678. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6025-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics