Abstract
Intelligent data analytics approaches are popular in landslide susceptibility mapping. This chapter develops a random forest (RF) approach for spatial modeling of landslide susceptibility. A total number of 78 landslide locations are identified using field survey, 55 of which are randomly selected to model landslide susceptibility and remaining 23 locations considered for model validation. Twelve predictor variables are selected: elevation, slope percentage, slope aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, distance from roads, distance from streams, distance from faults, lithological formations, land use, soil type, and topographic wetness index (TWI) to create an RF model for landslide susceptibility mapping. The results of RF model are evaluated using efficiency (E), true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), true skill statistic (TSS), and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in training and validation steps. RF model registered excellent goodness-of-fit with AUC = 93.6%, E = 0.887, TSS = 0.776, TPR = 0.905, FPR = 0.129, and predictive performance with AUC = 90.7%, E = 0.777, TSS = 0.559, TPR = 0.809, FPR = 0.25. Intelligent data analytic method, therefore, has a significant promise in tackling challenges of landslide susceptibility mapping in large regions, which may not have sufficient geotechnical data to employ a physically based method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Forest, Range and Watershed Management Organization.
References
Bachmair S, Weiler M (2012) Hillslope characteristics as controls of subsurface flow variability. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(10):3699–3715
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32
Calle ML, Urrea V (2010) Letter to the editor: stability of random forest importance measures. Briefings Bioinf 12(1):86–89
Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V (2013) Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(11):2815–2831
Frattini P, Crosta G, Carrara A (2010) Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models. Eng Geol 111(1–4):62–72
Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11(2):167–194
Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N (2016) Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in western Mazandaran Province. Iran Environ Earth Sci 75(3):185
Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9(2):181–199
Rahmati O, Kornejady A, Samadi M, Deo RC, Conoscenti C, Lombardo L, Bui DT (2019) PMT: New analytical framework for automated evaluation of geo-environmental modelling approaches. Sci Total Environ 664:296–311
Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TW, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahmati, O., Kornejady, A., Deo, R.C. (2021). Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility Using Random Forest Algorithm. In: Deo, R., Samui, P., Kisi, O., Yaseen, Z. (eds) Intelligent Data Analytics for Decision-Support Systems in Hazard Mitigation. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5772-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5772-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5771-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5772-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)