Skip to main content

An Innovative DEM Improvement Technique for Highly Dense Urban Cities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Hydroinformatics

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

Abstract

This paper presents an innovative approach to derive an improved Digital Elevation Model (DEM) using multispectral imagery and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The DEM is crucial in land and water management which reflects the actual topographic characteristic on earth surface. However, a high accuracy DEM is very difficult to acquire because it is often very costly and is treated as confidential.

DEM from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) has been improved using multispectral imagery of Sentinel 2 and the ANN with its strength of pattern recognition in big data processing. SRTM is widely used in the area where the high accuracy DEM is not available as it is easily accessible to the public with no cost. However, its accuracy is limited due to its coarse resolution (≈30 m) and sensor limitations. Sentinel 2 provides the 13 spectral band spans from the visible and the near infrared to the short wave infrared at different resolutions ranging from 10 to 60 m. Sentinel 2 produces different reflectance values in different land-uses. These two remote sensing data are used in ANN as input data. The ANN is trained with reference DEM which has a high accuracy level and different weights are calculated to reduce the error between the elevation of SRTM and reference DEM.

The trained ANN is applied to a different place to evaluate the performance. The improved SRTM presents clearer images with higher resolution than the original SRTM with 6 to 26% lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The paper should be of interest to readers in the areas of remote sensing, artificial intelligence and land/water management, especially for the policymakers who require land surface simulation with higher accuracy of topography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kim D-E, Gourbesville P, Liong S-Y (2019) Overcoming data scarcity in flood hazard assessment using remote sensing and artificial neural network. Smart Water 4(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wendi D, Liong S-Y, Sun Y, Doan CD (2016) An innovative approach to improve SRTM DEM using multispectral imagery and artificial neural network. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 8(2):691–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim D., Sun Y., Wendi D., Jiang Z., Liong S.-Y., Gourbesville P. (2018) Flood modelling framework for Kuching City, Malaysia: overcoming the lack of data, in Advances in Hydroinformatics. 2018, Springer. p. 559–568

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goetz AF, Vane G, Solomon JE, Rock BN (1985) Imaging spectrometry for earth remote sensing. Science 228(4704):1147–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Entwistle N, Heritage G, Milan D (2018) Recent remote sensing applications for hydro and morphodynamic monitoring and modelling. Earth Surf. Proc. Land 43(10):2283–2291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drusch M, Del Bello U, Carlier S, Colin O, Fernandez V, Gascon F, Hoersch B, Isola C, Laberinti P, Martimort P (2012) Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sens. Environ. 120:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersen OB, Woodworth PL, Flather RA (1995) Intercomparison of recent ocean tide models. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 100(C12):25261–25282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moody D.I., Brumby S.P., Rowland J.C., Altmann G.L. (2014) Land cover classification in multispectral imagery using clustering of sparse approximations over learned feature dictionaries, vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 1–19. SPIE

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ashish D, McClendon RW, Hoogenboom G (2009) Land-use classification of multispectral aerial images using artificial neural networks. Int. J. Remote Sens. 30(8):1989–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asharyanto H., Soeksmantono B., Wikantika K. (2015) Three Dimensional City Building Modelling With Lidar Data (Case Study: Ciwaruga, Bandung),, in INA-Rxiv

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graf L, Moreno-de-las-Heras M, Ruiz M, Calsamiglia A, García-Comendador J, Fortesa J, López-Tarazón J, Estrany J (2018) Accuracy assessment of digital terrain model dataset sources for hydrogeomorphological modelling in small mediterranean catchments. Remote Sens. 10(12):2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abily M., Delestre O., Amossé L., Bertrand N., Richet Y., Duluc C.-M., Gourbesville P., Navaro P. (2015) Uncertainty related to high resolution topographic data use for flood event modeling over urban areas: toward a sensitivity analysis approach. ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 48, 385–399

    Google Scholar 

  13. Axelberg P. (2007) On tracing flicker sources and classification of voltage disturbances. Department of Signals and Systems, Chalmers University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gurney K. (2014) An introduction to neural networks. https://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/courses/nlu/assets/reading/Gurney_et_al.pdf. CRC press

  15. Haykin S. (1994) Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall PTR, 768

    Google Scholar 

  16. ESRI, Environmental Systems Research Institute (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw. 61:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q. Appl. Math. 2(2):164–168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11(2):431–441

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Madsen R.A., Hunt T.E., Higley L.G. (2004) Alfalfa: Simulated Clover Leaf Weevil Injury and Alfalfa Yield and Quality

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wessel B., Fritz T., Busche T., Rizzoli P., Krieger G. (2016) TanDEM-X Ground Segment DEM Products Specification Document, DLR

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Willis Towers Watson (UK), Nice Côte d’Azur Metropolis (France) and German Aero Space Centre (DLR) for providing the data and for making this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongeon Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kim, D., Liong, SY., Gourbesville, P., Liu, J. (2020). An Innovative DEM Improvement Technique for Highly Dense Urban Cities. In: Gourbesville, P., Caignaert, G. (eds) Advances in Hydroinformatics. Springer Water. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5436-0_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics