Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Novel and Emerging Materials Used in 3D Printing for Oral Health Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
3D Printing in Biomedical Engineering

Part of the book series: Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials ((MHFNN))

  • 1150 Accesses

Abstract

3D printing is a revolutionary technique witnessed by the world in past some years and it has changed the face of almost all areas of life. A change in the paradigm from mechanical to biologic therapeutic solutions have been realized in health care, particularly, restoration of lost or damaged body parts with 3D printing. Oral health care is a wide scope area for immense applications from this latest technology. In order to tap the huge potential of 3D printing for dental applications, a great deal of research is going on for customized therapeutics catering to individual case conditions. Material science is undergoing tremendous growth to keep pace with the rapid rate of advances in imaging technologies for data capturing, information technologies devising newer design algorithms and devices and newer time and cost-effective printing machines. Diverse novel materials aimed at specific applications are being researched for providing optimized patient oral care. The current chapter provides an update of the materials used in most common oral health care applications and discusses the future trends and issues pertaining to material perspectives in oral health care management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

3DP:

3D printing

AM:

Additive manufacturing

FGM:

Functionally graded materials

FDM:

Fused deposition modeling

SL:

Stereolithography

SLS:

Selective laser sintering

PLA:

Polylactic acid

PLGA:

Polylactic glycolic acid

ABS:

Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene

HIPS:

High-Impact Polystyrene

TPU:

Thermoplastic Polyurethane

PET:

Polyethylene Terephthalate

PC:

Polycarbonate

SFF:

Solid Freeform Fabrication

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

PVC:

Polyvinyl chloride

HA:

Hydroxyapatite

TCP:

Tricalcium phosphate

PPF:

Polypropylene fumarate

PCL:

Polycaprolactone

PEG-DMA:

Polyethylene glycol methacrylate

PEG-DA:

Polyethylene glycol diacrylate

PEP-DEF:

Poly(propylene fumarate) with diethyl fumarate

PVA:

Polyvinyl alcohol

PHBV:

Poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxy valeric acid)

CHAp:

Carbonated hydroxyapatite

BSA:

bovine serum albumin

PEEK:

Polyether ether ketone

SLM:

Selective laser melting

EBM:

Electron beam melting

SMAs:

Shape memory alloys

SMPs:

Shape memory polymers

NiTi:

Nickel-titanium

References

  1. Tofail SAM, Koumoulos EP, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S, O’Donoghue L, Charitidis C (2018) Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater Today 21(1):22–37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emilia M, Marek M, Łukasz Z, Sonia S, Patryk K, Dariusz M (2014) 3D printing technologies in rehabilitation engineering (Technologiedruku 3D w in˙zynieriirehabilitacyjnej). J Health Sci 4(12):78–83

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawood A, Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A (2015) 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 219:521–529

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhushan J, Grover V (2019) Additive manufacturing: current concepts, methods, and applications in oral health care. In: Prakash C, Singh S, Singh R, Ramakrishna S, Pabla BS, Puri S, Uddin MS (eds) Biomanufacturing. Springer, Cham, pp 103–123

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quan Z et al (2016) Addit Manuf Mech Eng Annu Rep Mater Today 18:503–512

    Google Scholar 

  6. Additive Manufacturing: Strategic Research Agenda. http://www.rmplatform.com/linkdoc/AM%20SRA%20-%20February%202014.pdf

  7. Additive Manufacturing Tackling Standards & Certification. http://knowledge.ulprospector.com/3740/pe-additive-manufacturing-tackling-standardscertification/

  8. See CV, Meindorfer M (2016) 3D printing: additive processes in dentistry

    Google Scholar 

  9. Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA (2014) Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):192–204

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turner BN, Gold SA (2015) Rapid Prototyp J 21(3):250–261

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wendel B et al (2008) Macromol Mater Eng 293:799–809

    Google Scholar 

  12. Metal additive manufacturing/3D printing: an introduction. http://www.metalam.com/introduction-to-metal-additive-manufacturing-and-3d-printing/

  13. Gu DD, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R (2012) Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev 57(3):133–164

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Metallic additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art review and prospects. Mech Ind 139(2):89–96

    Google Scholar 

  15. King WE, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Kamath C, Khairallah SA, Rubenchik AM (2015) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):041304

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zocca A, Colombo P, Gomes CM et al (2015) Additive manufacturing of ceramics: issues, potentialities, and opportunities. J Am Ceram Soc 98(7):1983–2001

    Google Scholar 

  17. Travitzky N, Bonet A (2014) Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater 16:729–754

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mühler T, Gomes CM, Heinrich J, Günster J (2015) Slurry-based additive manufacturing of ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 12:18–25

    Google Scholar 

  19. Doreau F, Chaput C, Chartier T (2000) Stereolithography for manufacturing ceramic parts. Adv Eng Mater 2:493–496

    Google Scholar 

  20. Callister WD, Rethwisch D (2014) Materials science and engineering: an introduction, 9th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ebert J, Ozkol E, Zeichner A et al (2009) Direct inkjet printing of dental prostheses made of zirconia. J Dent Res 88:673–676

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scheithauer U, Schwarzer E, Richter H-J et al (2015) Thermoplastic 3D printing—an additive manufacturing method for producing dense ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 12:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tian X, Gunster J, Melcher J et al (2009) Process parameters analysis of direct laser sintering and post-treatment of porcelain components using Taguchi’s method. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:1903–1915

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maleksaeedi S, Eng H, Wiria FE et al (2014) Property enhancement of 3D-printed alumina ceramics using vacuum infiltration. J Mater Process Technol 214:1301–1306

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Waddell JN (2017) Additive technology: update on current materials and applications in dentistry. J Prosthod 26:156–163

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jardini AL, Larosa MA, de Carvalho Zavaglia CA et al (2014) Customised titanium implant fabricated in additive manufacturing for craniomaxillofacial surgery. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9:115–125

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jardini AL, Larosa MA, Maciel Filho R et al (2014) Cranial reconstruction: 3D bio model and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 42:1877–1884

    Google Scholar 

  29. Figliuzzi M, Mangano F, Mangano C (2012) A novel root analogue dental implant using CT scan and CAD/CAM: selective laser melting technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:858–862

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mangano FG, De Franco M, Caprioglio A et al (2014) Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue direct laser metal sintering (DLMS) implants: a 1-year prospective study on 15 patients. Laser Med Sci 29:1321–1328

    Google Scholar 

  31. Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M (2014) Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014:783948

    Google Scholar 

  32. Berman B (2012) 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 55:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  33. Karande TS, Ong JL, Agrawal CM (2004) Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing. Ann Biomed Eng 32:1728–1743

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hollister SJ (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4:518–524

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stevens MM, George JH (2005) Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310:1135–1138

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hollister S, Maddox R, Taboas J (2002) Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials 23:4095–4103

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arburg. 3D printing with freeform from ARBURG. http://www.arburg-injection-moulding-machine.com/3d-printing.html

  38. Park SH, Park DS, Shin JW, Kang YG, Kim HK, Yoon TR et al (2012) Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering fabricated from two different materials by the rapid prototyping technique: PCL versus PLGA. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:2671–2678

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kim J, McBride S, Tellis B, Alvarez-Urena P, Song Y-H, Dean DD et al (2012) Rapid-prototyped PLGA/β-TCP/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds in a rabbit femoral defect model. Biofabrication 4:025003

    Google Scholar 

  40. Woodfield TB, Malda J, De Wijn J, Peters F, Riesle J, van Blitterswijk CA (2004) Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials 25:4149–4161

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kalita SJ, Bose S, Hosick HL, Bandyopadhyay A (2003) Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Mater Sci Eng 23:611–620

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rai B, Teoh SH, Ho KH, Hutmacher DW, Cao T, Chen F et al (2004) The effect of rhBMP-2 on canine osteoblasts seeded onto 3D bioactive polycaprolactone scaffolds. Biomaterials 25:5499–5506

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lee K-W, Wang S, Fox BC, Ritman EL, Yaszemski MJ, Lu L (2007) Poly (propylene fumarate) bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication using stereolithography: effects of resin formulations and laser parameters. Biomacromol 8:1077–1084

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fisher JP, Dean D, Mikos A (2002) Photocrosslinking characteristics and mechanical properties of diethyl fumarate/poly (propylene fumarate) biomaterials. Biomaterials 23:4333–4343

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lohfeld S, Tyndyk M, Cahill S, Flaherty N, Barron V, McHugh P (2010) A method to fabricate small features on scaffolds for tissue engineering via selective laser sintering. J Biomed Sci Eng 3:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wiria FE, Leong KF, Chua CK, Liu Y (2007) Poly-ε-caprolactone/hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffold fabrication via selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tan K, Chua C, Leong K, Cheah C, Cheang P, Abu Bakar M et al (2003) Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. Biomaterials 24:3115–3123

    Google Scholar 

  48. Singh S, Prakash C, Ramakrishna S (2019, 26 February) 3D printing of polyether-ether-ketone for biomedical applications. Euro Polym J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.035

  49. Chua C, Leong K, Tan K, Wiria F, Cheah C (2004) Development of tissue scaffolds using selective laser sintering of polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite biocomposite for craniofacial and joint defects. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:1113–1121

    Google Scholar 

  50. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM, Flanagan CL, Krebsbach PH, Feinberg SE et al (2005) Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26:4817–4827

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nickels L (2012) World’s first patient-specific jaw implant. Met Powder Rep 67:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  52. Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, Mülhaupt R (2002) Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23:4437–4447

    Google Scholar 

  53. Maher P, Keatch R, Donnelly K, Paxton J (2009) Formed 3D bio-scaffolds via rapid prototyping technology. In: 4th European conference of the international federation for medical and biological engineering. Springer, pp 2200–2204

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pataky K, Braschler T, Negro A, Renaud P, Lutolf MP, Brugger J (2012) Microdrop printing of hydrogel bio inks into 3D tissue-like geometries. Adv Mater 24:391–396

    Google Scholar 

  55. Haberstroh K, Ritter K, Kuschnierz J, Bormann KH, Kaps C, Carvalho C et al (2010) Bone repair by cell-seeded 3D-plotted composite scaffolds made of collagen treated tricalcium phosphate or tricalcium phosphate-chitosan-collagen hydrogel or PLGA in ovine critical-sized calvarial defects. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 93:520–530

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chia HN, Wu BM (2015) Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng 9:4

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lee JY, An J, Chua CK (2017) Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today 7:120–133

    Google Scholar 

  58. Khoo ZX, Teoh JEM, Liu Y, Chua CK, Yang S, An J, Leong KF, Yeong WY (2015) 3D printing of smart materials: a review on recent progresses in 4D printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10:103–122

    Google Scholar 

  59. Leist SK, Zhou J (2016) Current status of 4D printing technology and the potential of light-reactive smart materials as 4D printable materials. Virtual Phys Prototyp 11:249–262

    Google Scholar 

  60. An J, Chua CK, Mironov V (2016) A perspective on 4D bioprinting. Int J Bioprint 2:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ge Q, Qi HJ, Dunn ML (2013) Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl Phys Lett 103:131901

    Google Scholar 

  62. Pei E (2014) 4D printing – revolution or fad? Assem Autom 34:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tibbits S (2014) 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit Des 84:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bogue R (2014) Smart materials: a review of capabilities and applications. Assem Autom 34:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pei E (2014) 4D printing: dawn of an emerging technology cycle. Assem Autom 34:310–314

    Google Scholar 

  66. Varadan VK, Vinoy KJ, Gopalakrishnan S (2006) Smart material systems and MEMS: design and development methodologies. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kim K et al (2014) 3D optical printing of piezoelectric nanoparticle-polymer composite materials. ACS Nano 8:9799–9806

    Google Scholar 

  68. Meier H et al (2009) Selective laser melting of NiTi shape memory components. Presented at the Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  69. Meier H, Haberland C, Frenzel J (2012) Structural and functional properties of NiTi shape memory alloys produced by Selective Laser Melting. Innovative Developments in Virtual and Physical Prototyping, London, pp 291–296

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dadbakhsh S et al (2014) Effect of SLM parameters on transformation temperatures of shape memory nickel-titanium parts. Adv Eng Mater 16:1140–1146

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rossiter J, Walters P, Stoimenov B (2009) Printing 3D dielectric elastomers actuators for soft robotics. Proc SPIE 7287

    Google Scholar 

  72. Raviv D et al (2014) Active printed materials for complex self evolving deformations. Sci Rep 4:Article Id-7422

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ivanova O et al (2014) Unclonable security features for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 1–4:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ge Q et al (2014) Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 23:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  75. Yu K et al (2015) Controlled sequential shape changing components by 3D printing of shape memory polymer multi-materials. Procedia IUTAM 12:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  76. Bormann T et al (2012) Tailoring selective laser melting process parameters for NiTi implants. J Mater Eng Perform 21:2519–2524

    Google Scholar 

  77. Elahinia MH et al (2012) Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: a review. Prog Mater Sci 57:911–946

    Google Scholar 

  78. Van Humbeeck J (2009) Shape memory alloys in smart materials. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang B, Chen J, Coddet C (2013) Microstructure and transformation behavior of in-situ shape memory alloys by Selective Laser Melting Ti-Ni mixed powder. J Mater Sci Technol 29:863–867

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zhang N, Khan T, Guo H, Shi S, Zhong W, Zhang W (2019) Functionally graded materials: an overview of stability, buckling, and free vibration analysis. Adv Mater Sci Eng Article ID 1354150:18 p

    Google Scholar 

  81. Toursangsaraki M (2018) A review of multi-material and composite parts production by modified additive manufacturing methods. J Mater Res

    Google Scholar 

  82. Besisa DHA, Ewais EMM (2016) Advances in functionally graded ceramics—processing. Sintering properties and applications. Intech open

    Google Scholar 

  83. Pettersson A, Magnusson P, Lundberg P, Nygren M (2005) Titanium-titanium di-boride composites as Part of a gradient armour material. Int J Impact Eng 32:387–399

    Google Scholar 

  84. Panda KB, Chandran KSR (2007) Titanium-titanium boride (Ti-TiB) functionally graded materials through reaction sintering: synthesis, microstructure, and properties. Metall Mater Trans A 34(9):1993–2003

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kaya C (2003) Al2O3-Y-TZP/Al2O3 functionally graded composites of tubular shape from nano-sols using double-step electrophoretic deposition. J Eur Ceram Soc 23:1655–1660

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sotirchos SV (1999) Functionally graded alumina/mullite coatings for protection of silicon carbide ceramic components from corrosion. Semi-annual report provided by University of Rochester, Department of Chemical Engineering, Rochester, New York. Special contribution to the book “Functionally graded materials; design, processing and applications”

    Google Scholar 

  87. Maruno S, Imamura K, Hanaichi T, Ban S, Iwata H, Itoh H (1994) Characterization and stability of bioactive HA–G–Ti composite materials and bonding to bone. Bio-ceramics 7:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  88. Maruno S, Itoh H, Ban S, Iwata H, Ishikawa T (1991) Micro-observation and characterization of bonding between bone and Ha–glass–titanium functionally gradient composite. Biomaterials 12:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  89. Zhou C, Deng C, Chena X, Zhao X, Chena Y, Fana Y, Zhang X (2015) Mechanical and biological properties of the micro-/nano-grain functionally graded hydroxyapatite bioceramics for bone tissue engineering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(8):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  90. Leong KF, Chuna CK, Sudaramadji N, Yeong W (2008) Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1:140–152

    Google Scholar 

  91. Seol YJ et al (2014) Bioprinting technology and its applications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46(3):342–348

    Google Scholar 

  92. Visser J et al (2013) Biofabrication of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs. Biofabrication 5(3):035007

    Google Scholar 

  93. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8): 773–785

    Google Scholar 

  94. Lee VK et al (2014) Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bioprinting technology. Biomaterials 35(28):8092–8102

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kumar A et al (2016) Low temperature additive manufacturing of three dimensional scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering applications: processing related challenges and property assessment. Mater Sci Eng R 103:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  96. Chua CK, Yeong WY (2015) Bioprinting: principles and applications. World Scientific Publishing Co., Pte. Ltd., Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  97. An J et al (2015) Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Engineering 1:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  98. Shue L, Yufeng Z, Mony U (2012) Biomaterials for periodontal regeneration. A review of ceramics and polymers. Biomatter 2(4):271–277

    Google Scholar 

  99. Singh M, Mann GS, Gupta MK, Singh R, Ramakrishna S (2019) Poly-lactic-acid: potential material for bio-printing applications. In: Prakash C, Singh S, Singh R, Ramakrishna S, Pabla BS, Puri S, Uddin MS (eds) Biomanufacturing. Springer, Cham, pp 69–87

    Google Scholar 

  100. Seliktar D, Dikovsky D, Napadensky (2013) Bioprinting and tissue engineering: recent advances and future perspectives. Isr J Chem 53:795–804

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professor and Head, Sri Sukhmani Dental College and Hospital, Dera Bassi, Punjab, India

    Anoop Kapoor

  2. Professor, Sri SGT Dental College and Hospital, SGT University, Gurugram, India

    Priyanka Chopra

  3. Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Dr. H.S.J. Institute of Dental Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

    Komal Sehgal

  4. Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dr. H.S.J. Institute of Dental Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

    Shaveta Sood

  5. Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dr. H.S.J. Institute of Dental Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

    Ashish Jain

  6. Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dr. H.S.J. Institute of Dental Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

    Vishakha Grover

Authors
  1. Anoop Kapoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Priyanka Chopra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Komal Sehgal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaveta Sood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ashish Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vishakha Grover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishakha Grover .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Sunpreet Singh

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

    Chander Prakash

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training & Research, Chandigarh, India

    Rupinder Singh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kapoor, A., Chopra, P., Sehgal, K., Sood, S., Jain, A., Grover, V. (2020). Novel and Emerging Materials Used in 3D Printing for Oral Health Care. In: Singh, S., Prakash, C., Singh, R. (eds) 3D Printing in Biomedical Engineering. Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5424-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation