Skip to main content

Safety vs. Sustainability – How Much Underpowering of Ships Is Acceptable?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 65))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 945 Accesses

Abstract

The present EEDI regulations have a strong impact on ship design. Especially for tankers and bulk carriers, the regulation results in the reduction of the installable main engine power. In 2020, the next EEDI reduction phase is put into force with the consequence that the main engine power of these ships will be reduced even further. The development helps to reduce emissions, especially greenhouse gases, but it puts challenges on ship safety, as the ship must still be maneuverable even in bad weather conditions. Recently, a grounding incident of a bulk carrier sea took place in the German Bight where the ship was dragging its anchor although the main engine was running at full speed. Numerical investigations of this accident showed that the environmental forces acting on the ship were larger than the sum of propeller and anchor forces. This incident was an excellent opportunity to investigate whether our existing numerical calculation methods are able to cope with such kind of incidents and whether it was possible to investigate the root cause of that particular grounding event. The paper gives an overview about the numerical investigations of the grounding event which address course keeping in heavy weather including anchor forces. Additionally, operational aspects of the main engine operation and the propulsion control systems are considered. The ship did not need to comply with the existing EEDI regulations. Therefore, the paper addresses also the effect of reduced main engine power on this particular incident, because it is obvious that reduced main engine power will make such incidents more probable, as limiting environmental conditions for a ship with less power will be less severe and therefore more probable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Augener, P.: Computation of Wave Drift Forces for Dynamic Positioning within the Early Design Stage. Ph.D-Thesis, Hamb. Univ of Techn. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Federal Bureau of Marine Casualty Investigations: Report 408/17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blendermann, W.: Practical Ship and Offshore Areodynamics. Schriftenreihe Schiffbau, Rep. 669. Hamburg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isay, W.H.: Propellertheorie. Springer, Heidelberg (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Josten, M.: Trajectory prediction of moored vessels with reduced station capability due to exceeded anchor load limits. In: OMAE, 2019, Glasgow, UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krüger, S.: Maneuvering – which results can be obtained from strip methods? In: Proceedings of JSTG 2018, vol. 108, Hamburg (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Billerbeck, H., Krüger, S., Lübcke A.: Safe maneuvering in adverse weather conditions. In: Proceedings of IMDC 2018, Helsinki, Finland (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lübcke, A.: Dynamic positioning as a new aspect in the early design stage of ships – calculations, model tests and results. In: Proceedings of JSTG, 2014 vol. 107, Hamburg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Papanikolau, A., Zaraphonitis, G., Bitner-Gregersen, E., Shigunov, V., EL Moctar, O., Guedes Soares, C., Reddy, D.N., Sprenger, F.: Minimum propulsion and steering requirements for efficient and safe operation (SHOPERA). In: Motorship P&EC Conference, Hamburg, 4–5 March 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Söding, H.: Body Forces. Manoeuvring Technical Manual. Seehafen Verlag, Hamburg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Söding, H.: Limits of potential theory in rudder flow predictions. Ship. Techn. Res. 45, 3 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vorhölter, H.: Numerische Analyse des Nachstroms und der Propellereffektivität am manövrierenden Schiff. Ph.D-Thesis, Hamb. Univ of Techn. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Krüger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Krüger, S., Josten, M., Souflis, L. (2021). Safety vs. Sustainability – How Much Underpowering of Ships Is Acceptable?. In: Okada, T., Suzuki, K., Kawamura, Y. (eds) Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures. PRADS 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4680-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4680-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4679-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4680-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics