Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inherent Mapping Analysis of Agile Development Methodology Through Design Thinking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science and Intelligent Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 52))

  • 1571 Accesses

Abstract

Software engineering is a systematic set of activities which leads to the development of software solutions of the user’s requirement. In today’s information era, there is a need to fulfill the user’s requirements quickly in a swift and systematic manner, which is done through agile development methodology. Design thinking facilitates the software development team not only to identify the explicit requirements but also the implicit requirements very keenly. This paper introduces the new framework—Intelli-A, which inherently maps the design thinking approach in agile methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbas N, Gravell AM, Wills GB (2008) Historical roots of agile methods: where did “Agile thinking” come from?. In: International conference on agile processes and extreme programming in software engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 94–103

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buzan T, Griffiths C (2013) Mind maps for business. In: Using the ultimate thinking tool to revolutionise how you work, 2nd edn. Pearson, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bella M, Hanington B (2012) Universal methods of design. Rockport Publishers, Beverly, p 204

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roman P (2013) The product canvas—a lean tool for creating new products. Cambridge Product Management Network

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin KS (2012) Essential scrum: a practical guide to the most popular agile process. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beck K (1999) Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer 32(10):70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Highsmith J, Cockburn A (2001) Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer 34(9):120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ambler S (2002) Agile modeling: effective practices for extreme programming and the unified process. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  9. Magare A, Lamin M (2017) Cognitive evolution in software development life cycle through design thinking. Comput Model New Technol 21(3):31–34

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sohaib O, Solanki H, Dhaliwa N, Hussain W, Asif M (2019) Integrating design thinking into extreme programming. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 10(6):2485–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pereira JC, de FSM Russo R (2018) Design thinking integrated in agile software development: a systematic literature review. Procedia Comput Sci 138:775–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dobrigkeit F, de Paula D (2019) Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM joint meeting on European software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering, pp 1059–1069

    Google Scholar 

  13. dos Santos Braz R, Merlin JR, Trindade DFG, Ribeiro CE, Sgarbi EM, de Sordi Jr F (2019) Design thinking and scrum in software requirements elicitation: a case study. In: International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Cham, pp 179–194

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brown T, Wyatt J (2010) Design thinking for social innovation. Dev Outreach 12(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hendricks S, Conrad N, Douglas TS, Mutsvangwa T (2018) A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation. In: Healthcare, vol 6(3). Elsevier, pp 191–196

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cárdenas LFS, Ibarra ERB, Díaz-Piraquive FN, Rojas IR, González-Crespo R, Calvo A (2018) Design thinking application methodology for pediatric service innovation. In: International conference on knowledge management in organizations. Springer, Cham, pp 215–222

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kinnunen S (2018) The inferences between design thinking and innovation management

    Google Scholar 

  18. Woudhuysen J (2011) The craze for design thinking: roots, a critique, and toward an alternative. Des Principles Practices 5(6):235–248

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson MS, Cheville RA (2018) Navigating process-product tensions using a design canvas. In: ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, ITM(SLS) Baroda University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

    Archana Magare & Madonna Lamin

  2. Executive Dean (Research and International Linkage) and Institute Distinguished Senior Chair Professor, Techno India NJR Institute of Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

    Prasun Chakrabarti

  3. Adjunct Distinguished Professor, ITM(SLS) Baroda University, Vadodara, India

    Prasun Chakrabarti

Authors
  1. Archana Magare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Madonna Lamin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prasun Chakrabarti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Archana Magare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune, India

    Ketan Kotecha

  2. Department of Computer Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Vincenzo Piuri

  3. Gandhinagar Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Hetalkumar N. Shah

  4. Department of Computer Engineering, Gandhinagar Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Rajan Patel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Magare, A., Lamin, M., Chakrabarti, P. (2021). Inherent Mapping Analysis of Agile Development Methodology Through Design Thinking. In: Kotecha, K., Piuri, V., Shah, H., Patel, R. (eds) Data Science and Intelligent Applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 52. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4474-3_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation