Skip to main content

Section 1: Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health, Technology and Society

Abstract

Innovation is one of the major processes shaping the health-technology-society relation: innovation of technologies, of healthcare systems, of the very meaning of health and its absence. This section draws on extracts from five of the Health, Technology and Society books, which, in their different ways, examine innovation and its meaning, especially how innovation processes are shaped by different contexts and practices. The five books are:

  • Boenink et al. (Emerging technologies for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease. Innovating with care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016) focus on innovation in early diagnostics for Alzheimer’s.

  • Oudshoorn (Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011) shows how innovation depends on the distributed labour and interpretation of imaging and data by diverse clinical and non-clinical actors.

  • Gardner (Learning from deep brain stimulation: The fallacy of techno-solutionism and the need for ‘regimes of care’. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9858-6, 2018) examines innovation in deep brain stimulation.

  • Balka et al. (eds.) (2009) show how the everyday use of ICT systems in different healthcare settings mediate and often reproduce gender and racial relations and hierarchies.

  • Lynch and Farrington (eds.) (Quantified lives and vital data. Exploring health and technology through personal medical devices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018) analyse the rapid growth of ‘personalised medical devices’ in clinical and non-clinical contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (1990). Theorizing women’s work. Aurora: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (2001). The double ghetto: Canadian women and their segregated work (3rd ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (2004). Thinking it through: Women, work and caring in the new millennium. In K. R. Grant, C. Amaratunga, P. Armstrong, M. Boscoe, A. Pederson, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Caring for/Caring about: Women, home care and unpaid caregiving (pp. 5–43). Aurora: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASH. (2016). Use of electronic cigarettes (vapourisers) among adults in Great Britain. Action on Smoking on Health (ASH) Fact sheet 33. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from http://www.ash.org.uk/fles/documents/ASH_891.pdf

  • Atkinson, P. (1984). Training for certainty. Social Science & Medicine, 19, 949–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balka, E. et al. (2009). Gender, health and information technology in context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balka, E., & Wagner, I. (Submitted). A historical view of studies of women’s work. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, M. (1989). Feminism and systems design: Questions of control. In W. Tomm (Ed.), The effects of feminist approaches on research methodologies (pp. 205–224). Calgary: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. (1996). Practices of reading and writing: The constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociology of Health & Illness, 18, 499–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boenink, M., van Lente, H., & Moors, E. (Eds.). (2016). Emerging technologies for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease. Innovating with care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. (2003). Hope Against hype: Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies, 16(2), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2015, January 19). Prof Bruce Keogh: Wearable technology plays a crucial part in NHS future. The Guardian. Retrieved December 20, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/19/prof-bruce-keogh-wearable-technology-plays-crucial-part-nhs-future.

  • Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2002). Canada’s health care providers. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalibert, L. (2016). Living with spinal cord stimulation: Doing embodiment and incorporation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(4), 635–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. (2015, November 3). Wearable tech usage to grow by 60 Percent this year. Bionicly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., Menking, A., Steinhardt, S., Hoffmann, A., & Bardzell, S. (2017). Imagining intersectional futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp.387–393). February 25–March 01, 2017, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J., & Warren, N. (2018). Learning from deep brain stimulation: The fallacy of techno-solutionism and the need for ‘regimes of care’. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9858-6.

  • George, D. R., Qualls, S., Camp, C., & Whitehouse, P. J. (2013). Renovating Alzheimer’s: “Constructive” reflections on the new clinical and research diagnostic guidelines. The Gerontologist, 53(3), 378–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D. R., & Whitehouse, P. J. (2010). Intergenerational volunteering and quality of life for persons with mild-to-moderate dementia: Results from a 5-month intervention study in the United States. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(4), 796–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gøtzsche, P., & Nielsen, M. (2006). Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD001877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, K., Amaratunga, C., Armstrong, P., Boscoe, M., Pederson, A., & Willson, K. (Eds.). (2004). Caring for/caring about: Women, home care, and unpaid caregiving. Aurora: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E., & Singleton, C. (2013). ‘Gendering the digital’: The impact of gender and technology. Perspectives on the Sociological Imagination. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_3.

  • Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 190–233). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyysalo, S., Elgaard Jensen, T., & Oudshoorn, N. (Eds.). (2016). The new production of users: Changing involvement strategies and innovation collectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, Z., Rajji, T., & Shulman, L. (2010). Brief cognitive screening instruments: An update. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankovic, J. (2007). Dystonic disorders. In J. Jankovic & E. Tolosa (Eds.), Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders (pp. 321–347). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. L., & Meller, S. (2014). Can we say what diet is best for health? Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2010). The Materials of STS, in D. Hicks and M. Beaudry (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Material Cultural Studies, 173–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledger, D., & McCafrey, D. (2014). Inside wearables: How the science of human behaviour change offers the secret to long-term engagement. Endeavour Partners. Retrieved December 20, 2019, from https://digitalwellbeing.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2014-Inside-Wearables-Part-2-July-2014.pdf

  • Lie, M., & Sørenson, K. H. (1996). Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippel, K. (1999). Workers’ compensation and stress. Gender and access to compensation. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippel, K. (2003). Compensation for musculoskeletal disorders in Quebec: Systemic discrimination against women workers? International Journal of Health Services, 33, 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, R., & Farrington, C. (Eds.). (2018). Quantified lives and vital data. Exploring health and technology through personal medical devices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, C. et al. (2016). Implementation, context and complexity. Implementation Science, 11(1), 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messing, K. (1998). One-eyed science: Occupational health and women workers. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. J., & Tancred, P. (Eds.). (1992). Gendering organizational analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2006). Proving or improving: On health care research as a form of self-reflection. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 405–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 7–27). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, T., O’Donovan, O., & Howlett, E. (2014). Assembling dementia care: Patient organisations and social research. BioSocieties, 9(2), 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. (2001). Gender-sensitive home and community care and caregiving research: A synthesis paper. Ottawa: Women’s Health Bureau, Health Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, I. (2010). Perhaps tears should not be counted but wiped away: On quality and improvement in dementia care. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 277–300). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2013). Novel neurotechnologies: Intervening in the brain. Oxford: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, N. (2015). Sustaining cyborgs. Sensing and tuning agencies of pacemakers and ICDs. Social Studies of Science, 45(1), 56–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, N. (2016). The vulnerability of cyborgs. The case of ICD shocks. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(5), 767–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, N. (2018). Hybrid bodies and the materiality of everyday life. How people living with pacemakers and defibrillators reinvent everyday routines and intimate relations. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(1), 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter. The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickstone, J. (2000). Ways of knowing: A new science, technology and medicine. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pols, J. (2014). Knowing patients: Turning patient knowledge into science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portacolone, E., Berridge, C., Johnson, J., & Schicktanz, S. (2014). Time to reinvent the science of dementia: The need for care and social integration. Ageing & Mental Health, 18(4), 269–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeharisoa, V., Moreira, T., & Akrich, M. (2014). Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties, 9(2), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (2006). “A Leg to Stand On: Prosthetics, Metaphor, and Materiality.” In M. Smith and M. Morra (eds.). The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Presence to a Biocultural Future, 17–41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2007). The Time of Materiality, Qualitative Social Research, 8(1), Art. 2, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs070122.

  • Small, S. S., Hohl, C. M., & Balka, E. (2019). Organizational implications of implementing a new adverse drug event reporting system for care providers and integrating it with provincial health information systems. Healthcare Management Forum, 32(4), 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42, 1568–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treichler, P., Cartwright, L., & Penley, C. (Eds.). (1998). The visible woman: Imaging technologies, gender and science. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulucanlar, S., Faulkner, A., Peirce, S., & Elwyn, G. (2013). Technology identity: The role of sociotechnical representations in the adoption of medical devices. Social Science & Medicine, 98, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wathen, C. N., Wyatt, S., & Harris, R. (Eds.). (2008). Mediating health information: The go-betweens in a changing socio-technical landscape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A., & Brown, N. (2004). New medical technologies and society: Reordering life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, P. J. (2010, Spring). Taking brain health to a deeper and broader level. Neurological Institute Journal, 3(1), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, P. J., Gaines, A., Lindstrom, H., & Graham, J. (2005). Dementia in the anthropological gaze: Contributions to the understanding of dementia. The Lancet Neurology, 4, 320–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, P. J., & George, D. R. (2008). The myth of Alzheimer’s: What you aren’t being told about today’s most dreaded diagnosis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Boenink .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boenink, M. et al. (2020). Section 1: Innovation. In: Webster, A., Wyatt, S. (eds) Health, Technology and Society. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4354-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4354-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4353-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4354-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics