Abstract
Food production systems, agricultural landscapes, and the distribution and consumption of valued products often reflect social dynamics. They are also a manifestation of the way societies decide on how to respond to environmental pressures. Using Ifugao (Philippines) and Tayal (Taiwan), two Indigenous Communities in highland Philippines and Taiwan as examples, this article aims to reveal the social ecological meanings of maintaining and revitalizing ritual crops in contemporary capitalist world. Adopting the methods of literature review, ethnographic study, and case study, the authors: 1) explain how the ecology, labor investment, social organization, and belief system made agricultural landscape an agro-cultural complex; 2) trace the landscape transition in the process of colonization and modernization; and 3) address recent efforts to revitalize the ritual crops in the landscape of both cases. By comparing these experiences, the authors point out the importance of continuous enactment and representation of traditions. With these efforts, the communal identities are sustained, and the alternative models of economy are made possible. In the end, the authors propose a dynamic view of landscape and make further suggestions for landscape conservation. Luzon Island of the Philippines is approximately three times the size of Taiwan and is located 300 km south of the smaller nation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A mountain ridge across this township divides it into two watersheds: the “Front Mountain” in the north-west and the “Back Mountain” in the south-east. The “Front Mountain” and the “Back Mountain” are not official addresses but commonly used in the residents’ daily life. The “front” has a long history of confronting Han-Chinese that can be traced back to the Ching Dynasty’s military activities aiming to conquer this area and exploit the camphor resource here. During the Japanese colonial era, a local political, educational and economic center was formed in “Front Mountain”, as it is on the way connecting the interior “Back Mountain Region” and the lower non-indigenous plain area. For a long time, the “Front Mountain Region” was deemed more “developed” and “progressed” than the “less-developed” and “backward” “Back Mountain Region”. After the 1990s, some settlements in the “Back Mountain Region” area successfully established alternative models of development, such as community-based eco-tourism with their strong cultural identity. In the new discourse, the “Front Mountain Region” turned to be a “less authentic” place facing the crisis of losing their culture in contrast to the self-confident “Back Mountain Region” maintaining more “traditional” Tayal culture. (Stainton 2006).
- 2.
Raw meat fermented with cooked millet or rice, a traditional Tayal food.
- 3.
The government responded to the indigenous land rights movement by assigning more reserved land to indigenous peoples in 1990, and launched a series of surveys of indigenous traditional territories in 2002. After that, the Indigenous Basic Law enacted in 2005 states that the government needs to recognize indigenous peoples’ rights over both reserved lands and traditional territories (Kuan 2016).
References
Acabado, S. B. (2012). The Ifugao agricultural landscapes: Complementary systems and the intensification debate. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 43(3), 500–522.
Acabado, S. B., & Martin, M. (2015). Between pragmatism and cultural context: Continuity and change in Ifugao wet-rice agriculture. In W. Willems & H. van Schaik (Eds.). Water and Heritage: Material, Conceptual and Spiritual Connections (pp. 275–297). Leiden: Sidestone Press Academic.
Acabado, S. (2018). Zones of refuge: Resisting conquest in the Northern philippine highlands through environmental practice. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 52, 180–195.
Ananayo, J., & Richins, H. (2016). Regional collaboration in community-based mountain tourism in World Heritage Sites: The Ifugao rice terraces of the Cordillera Central Mountains in the Philippines. In H. Richins & J. Hull (Eds.). Mountain Tourism: Experiences, Communities, Environments and Sustainable Futures (pp. 220–234). Boston: CABI.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of the theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y. S., Kuan, D. W., Suchet-Pearson, S., & Richard Howitt. (2018) Decolonizing Property in Taiwan: Challenging Hegemonic Constructions of Property. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(6), 987–1006.
Conklin, H. (1980). Ethnographic atlas of ifugao. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Czepczyński, M. (2008). Cultural landscape of post-socialist cities: Representation of powers and needs. Burlington: Ashgate.
Dietler, M., & Herbich, I. (1998). Habitus, techniques, style: An integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture boundaries. In M. T. Stark (Ed.). The Archaeology of Social Boundaries (pp. 232–263). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Dumia, M. A. (1979). The Ifugao world. Quezon City: New Day Publishers.
Eckert, S. (2008). Pottery and practice: The expression of identity at pottery mound and hummingbird pueblo. Albuquerque: University of Mexico Press.
Forman, R. T. T. (1995a). Land Mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forman, R. T. T. (1995b). Some general principles of landscape. Landscape Ecology, 10, 133–142.
Forman, R. T. T. & Hersperger, A. M. (1996). Road ecology and road density in different landscapes, with international planning and mitigation solutions. In Trends in Addressing Transportation Related Wildlife Mortality: Proceedings of the Transportation Related Wildlife Mortality Seminar. Orlando: Florida DOT.
Glover, D. & Stone, G. D. (2018). Heirloom Rice in Ifugao: An ‘Anti-commodity’ in the process of commodification. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(4), 776–804.
Guimbatan, R., & Baguilat, T. (2006). Misunderstanding the notion of conservation in the philippine rice terraces-cultural landscapes. International Social Science Journal, 58(187), 59–67.
Kuan, D. W. (2017) Ethnos, Geography and Development: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Environmental Relations [Minzu, dili, yu fazhan: Rendi guanxi yanjiu de kuaxueke jiaohui] Taipei: Shung Ye Museum of Formosan Aborigines.
Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage.
Mark, D. M., Turk, A. G., Burenhult, N., & David, S. (Ed.). (2011). Landscape in Language: Transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 1–24). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Moore, J. (2014). Consequences of the introduction of commercial cultivars on the Ifugao rice terraces World Heritage Site. MA Thesis: Leiden University.
O’Connor, R. A. (1995). Agricultural change and ethnic succession in Southeast Asian states: A case for regional anthropology. The Journal of Asian Studies, 54(4), 968–996.
Salas, R. M. (1985). More than the Grains: Participatory Management in Philippine Rice Sufficiency Program, 1967–1969. Tokyo: Simul Press.
Sheppard, P., Aswani, S., Walter, R., & Nagaoka, T. (2002). Cultural sediment: The nature of a cultural landscape in roviana lagoon. In T. Ladefoged & M. Graves (Eds.). Pacific Landscape: Archaeological Approaches (pp. 35–61). Los Osos: Easter Island Foundation.
SITMo (2008). IMPACT: The Effects of Tourism on Culture and the Environment in Asia and the Pacific: Sustainable Tourism and the Preservation of the World Heritage Site of the Ifugao Rice Terraces, Philippines. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok.
Scott, W. (1974). The discovery of the igorots: Spanish contacts with the pagans of Northern Luzon. Quezon City: New Day Publishers.
Skibo, J. M., & Schiffer, M. B. (2008). People and things: A behavioral approach to material culture. New York: Springer.
Stainton, M. (2006). Hou Shan/Qian Shan Mugan: Categories of self and other in a Tayal Village. History, Culture and Ethnicity: Selected Papers from the International Conference on the Formosan Indigenous Peoples (pp. 978–957). Taipei: SMC Publishing Inc.
Thomas, J. (2012) Archaeologies of place and landscape. In I. Hodder (Ed.). Archaeological theory today (pp. 167–187). Polity: Cambridge.
Tilliger, B., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Bustamante, J. V., & Settele, J. (2015). Disentangling values in the interrelations between cultural ecosystem services and landscape conservation–A case study of the ifugao rice terraces in the philippines. Land, 4(3), 888–913.
Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
UNESCO. n.d. Rice terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras. Available at http://whc.unesco.org/pg.cfm?cid=31&idsite=722.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Acabado, S., Kuan, Dw. (2021). Landscape, Habitus, and Identity: A Comparative Study on the Agricultural Transition of Highland Indigenous Communities in the Philippines and Taiwan. In: Shih, Sm., Tsai, Lc. (eds) Indigenous Knowledge in Taiwan and Beyond. Sinophone and Taiwan Studies, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4178-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4178-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4177-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4178-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)