Abstract
This study investigates various fluency and disfluency features of oral performances by second language (L2) learners of Chinese to explore how these features differ and develop at different levels of oral proficiency in L2 Chinese. Although fluency has been extensively researched, few studies have explored oral fluency in L2 Chinese, with the available ones addressing a small number of fluency features or a restricted range of learner proficiency. The present study extends this body of research by including L2 learners at various curricular levels and by examining a more comprehensive set of fluency features. Oral responses to a narrative task were collected from thirty-eight L2 learners of Chinese at a US university. Their responses were holistically scored on four different levels and were analyzed for eleven fluency and disfluency features, including features of the amount and rate of speech, pausing, and repairs. Results showed that features of the amount and rate of speech and silent pausing not only demonstrated strong relationships with score levels but could also distinguish among the various levels with more distinctive differences observed at higher score levels than at lower ones. These findings have important implications for the teaching and assessment of speaking in L2 Chinese.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Shapiro–Wilk normality tests were conducted to check whether the normality assumption was met for ANOVA tests. The number of lexical fillers did not reach the statistical threshold for normal distribution. Log and square root transformations were attempted, but none of them resulted in a better approximation of normal distribution. Therefore, the original data was retained for analysis, and the result was interpreted cautiously. Nonetheless, the ANOVA result aligned with the visual representation of the boxplot.
References
Baker‐Smemoe, W., Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Martinsen, R. A. (2014). Does measuring L2 utterance fluency equal measuring overall L2 proficiency? Evidence from five languages. Foreign Language Annals, 47(4), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12110.
Blake, C. G. (2006). The potential of text-based Internet chats for improving ESL oral fluency (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.11) [Computer program]. https://www.praat.org/.
Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A.-F., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394.
Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(97)00046-8.
Chen, M. (2012). 美国留学生汉语口语产出的流利性研究 [Chinese oral fluency of CSL learners of American English speakers]. 语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 2, 17–24.
Chen, M. (2015). 汉语作为第二语言自然口语产出的复杂度、准确度和流利度研究 [Complexity, accuracy and fluency in Chinese as second language acquisition]. 语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 3, 1–10.
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(2), 989–999. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428279.
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(6), 2862–2873. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1471894.
De Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In The 6th workshop on disfluency in spontaneous speech (pp. 17–20).
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x.
Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In D. Hymes, C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–101). Academic Press.
Freed, B. F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 123–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Freed, B. F. (2000). Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes (and ears) of the beholder? In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 243–265). University of Michigan.
Fulcher, G. (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction. Language Testing, 13(2), 208–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300205.
Ginther, A., Dimova, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364407.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press.
Hawkins, P. R. (1971). The syntactic location of hesitation pauses. Language and Speech, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097101400308.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048.
Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm017.
Jin, T., & Mak, B. (2013). Distinguishing features in scoring L2 Chinese speaking performance: How do they work? Language Testing, 30(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212442637.
Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12084.
Kang, O., & Yan, X. (2018). Linguistic features distinguishing examinees’ speaking performances at different proficiency levels. Journal of Language Testing & Assessment, 1(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.23977/langta.2018.11003.
Koponen, M., & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 5–24). University of Michigan Press.
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x.
Liu, Y., & Wu, X. (2016). 汉语二语学习者口语产出的流利度研究 [Exploring speaking fluency in the speech of L2 Chinese learners]. 华文教学与研究 [TCSOL Studies], 64(4), 32–41.
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263198001041.
Möhle, D. (1984). A comparison of the second language speech production of different native speakers. In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language productions (pp. 26–49). Guner Narr Verlag.
Perception Research Systems. (2007). Paradigm stimulus presentation [Computer program]. https://www.paradigmexperiments.com.
Raupach, M. (1984). Formulae in second language speech production. In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language productions (pp. 114–137). Gunter Narr Verlag.
Riazantseva, A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226310100403x.
Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795.
Rohde, L. (1985). Compensatory fluency: A study of spoken English produced by four Danish learners. Learner Discourse, 43–69.
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge.
Shih, C., & Wu, C. (2011). Evaluating second language fluency. Proceedings of VLSP, 2011, 38–41.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071.
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). John Benjamins.
Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A. M. (2020). Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12620.
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597688-011.
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263106060013.
Wennerstrom, A. (2000). The role of intonation in second language fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 102–127). University of Michigan.
Ye, W. (2015). 英语母语者汉语口语水平发展研究 [The oral Chinese language development of native English speakers]. 南京师范大学文学院学报 [Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture of Nanjing Normal University], 4, 170–174.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1.
Zellner, B. (1994). Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. In E. Keller (Ed.), Fundamentals of speech synthesis and speech recognition (pp. 41–62). Wiley.
Zhai, Y. (2011). 口语流利性主观标准的客观化研究 [An objective study on the subjective criteria of speaking fluency]. 语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 5, 79–86.
Zhai, Y., & Feng, H. (2014). 基于“看图说话”任务的汉语学习者口语流利性发展研究 [A study of Chinese learners’ speaking fluency development with picture description activity]. 华文教学与教育 [TCSOL Studies], 56(4), 1–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Scoring rubric | |
---|---|
4 | The response fulfills the demands of the task, with at most minor lapses in completeness. It is highly intelligible and exhibits sustained, coherent discourse |
3 | The response addresses the task appropriately but may fall short of being fully developed. It is generally intelligible and coherent, with some fluidity of expression, though it exhibits some noticeable lapses in the expression of ideas |
2 | The response addresses the task, but the development of the topic is limited. It contains intelligible speech, although problems with delivery and/or overall coherence occur; meaning may be obscured in places |
1 | The response is very limited in content and/or coherence or is only minimally connected to the task, or speech is largely unintelligible |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lei, Y. (2021). Exploring Fluency and Disfluency Features of Oral Performances in Chinese as a Second Language. In: Yang, C. (eds) The Acquisition of Chinese as a Second Language Pronunciation. Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3809-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3809-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3808-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3809-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)