Skip to main content

Wear Particle Analysis Using Fractal Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Wear particle characterization plays a important role in condition monitoring of machine as most of the breakdown occurs due to wear particle saturation in the lubricating oil. Traditional methods for wear debris analysis depend on human expertise to conclude the results, which are subjective in nature, time consuming, and costly. The objective of this paper is to categorize different techniques of fractal analysis to study the wear particle morphology and calculate fractal dimension of wear particles. Fractal analysis is used to give information about different features of wear particles like fractal dimension, shape, size, color, boundary representation, and surface/texture analysis. This data can be used to detect the fault and decide prognostic maintenance period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kumar M (2013) Advancement and current status of wear debris analysis for machine condition monitoring: a review. Ind Lubr Tribol 65:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stachowiak GW (1998) Numerical characterization of wear particles morphology and angularity of particles and surfaces. Tribol Int 31:139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar C Kumar M (2016) Wear debris analysis using ferrography. Int J Recent Trends Eng Res 2(8):398–404

    Google Scholar 

  4. Podsiadlo P, Podsiadlo GW (2000) Scale-invariant analysis of wear particle surface morphology: II. Fractal Dimension Wear 242:180–188

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raadnui S (2005) Wear particle analysis—utilization of quantitative computer image analysis: a review. Tribol Int 38(10):871–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirk TB, Panzera D, Anamalay RV, Xu ZL (1995) Computer image analysis of wear debris for machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Wear 181:717–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh S, Sarkar B (2005) Wear characterization by fractal mathematics for quality improvement of machine. J Q Maintenance Eng 11(4):318–332

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lopes R, Betrouni N (2009) Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review. Med Image Anal 13:634–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Debnath L (2006) A brief historical introduction to fractals and fractal geometry. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 37:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang MC, Kim JS, Kim KH (2005) Fractal dimension analysis of machined surface depending on coated tool wear. Surf Coat Technol 193(1–3):259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah H, Hirani H (2014) Online condition monitoring of spur gears. Int J Condition Monit 4:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirk TB, Stachowiak GW, Batchelor AW (1991) Fractal Parameters and computer image analysis applied to wear particles isolated by ferrography. Wear 145:347–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stachowiak GW, Kirk TB, Stachowiak GB (1991) Ferrography and fractal analysis of contamination particles in unused lubricating oils. Tribol Int 6:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. So GB, So HR, Jin GG (2017) Enhancement of the box-counting algorithm for fractal dimension estimation. Pattern Recognit Lett 98:53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li J, Du Q, Sun C (2009) An improved box-counting method for image fractal dimension estimation. Pattern Recogn 42(11):2460–2469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzato G, Mulargia F, Marzocchi W (1998) Practical application of fractal analysis: problems and solutions. The Charlesworth Group 132:275–282

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hong-tao L, Shi-rong G (2009) Fishbone graph fractal description to UHMWPE wear debris boundary. Tribol Int 42(11–12):1624–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shirong G, Guoan C, Xiaoyun Z (2001) Fractal characterization of wear particle accumulation in the wear process. Wear 251(1–12):1227–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klinkenberg B (1994) A review of methods used to determine the fractal dimension of linear features. Math Geol 26(1):23–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karperien A (2004) FracLac advanced user manual. Charles Sturt University, Australia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Puja P. More .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

More, P.P., Jaybhaye, M.D. (2021). Wear Particle Analysis Using Fractal Techniques. In: Kalamkar, V., Monkova, K. (eds) Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3638-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3639-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics