Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The SUPER Numerical Scheme for the Discretization of the Convection Terms in Computational Fluid Dynamics Computations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
50 Years of CFD in Engineering Sciences

  • 2719 Accesses

Abstract

The numerical simulation of fluid flow and heat/mass transfer phenomena requires the numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes and energy conservation equations coupled with the continuity equation. Numerical or false diffusion is the phenomenon of producing errors in the calculations that compromise the accuracy of the computational solution. According to Spalding, the Taylor series analysis that reveals the truncation/discretization errors of the differential equations terms should not be classified as false diffusion. Numerical diffusion, in the strict sense of definition, appears in multidimensional flows when the differencing scheme fails to account for the true direction of the flow. Numerical errors associated with false diffusion are investigated via two- and three-dimensional problems. A numerical scheme must satisfy some necessary criteria for the successful solution of the convection–diffusion formulations. The common practice of approximating the diffusion terms via the central-difference approximation is satisfactory. Attention is directed to the convection terms since their approximations induce false diffusion. The conservation equations of all the dependent variables in this study are discretized by the finite volume method. The performance of different numerical schemes (e.g. hybrid, van Leer, SUCCA and the novel SUPER version) is studied in this chapter by the numerical simulation of the transport of a scalar quantity in an inclined and tubular airflow, heat conduction in a cylindrical heat exchanger, and the water vapour condensation in an enclosed space. The numerical accuracy of the predictions obtained when using the various schemes was also studied in the classical cases of the backward-facing step and of an inclined inflow. The study focused on the transport of a contaminant concentration by means of an airflow, the diffusion of temperature in an water flow and at the solid surface of a triple tube, the mass transfer interaction between liquid droplets and humid air and on circular airflow predictions. An Eulerian one- and two-phase flow model is developed within the CFD general-purpose computer program PHOENICS, which considers the phases as interpenetrating continua. The phases may move at different velocities (slip velocity) in a manner that is dictated by the interphase friction. According to the numerical results obtained, it is concluded that the predictions improve when using SUPER in all cases of inclined flow and of humid air precipitation while they are similar to the predictions of the other schemes in the case of heat conduction in the tubular flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Quadratic-Upwind Differencing Scheme.

References

  1. Patel, M. K., Markatos, N. C., & Cross, M. (1985). Technical note-method of reducing false diffusion errors in convection diffusion problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 9, 302–306.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel, M. K., & Markatos, N. C. (1986). An evaluation of eight discretization schemes for two-dimensional convection-diffusion equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods, 6, 129–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Darwish, M., & Moukalled, F. (1996). A new approach for building bounded skew-upwind schemes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 129, 221–233.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. De Vahl Davis, G., & Mallinson, G. D. (1976). An evaluation of upwind and central difference approximations by a study of recirculating flows. Computers & Fluids, 4(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fromm, J. E. (1968). A method for reducing dispersion in convective difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 3, 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Spalding, D. B. (1972). A novel finite-difference formulation for different expressions involving both first and second derivatives. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 4, 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leonard, B. P. (1979). A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolating. Computational Mechanics and Applied Mechanical Engineering, 4, 557–559.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Leer, B. (1985). Upwind-difference methods for aerodynamics problems governed by the Euler equations. Lectures in Applications of Mathematics, 22, 327–336.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Raithby, G. D. (1976). Skew upstream differencing schemes for problems involving fluid flow. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 9, 151–156.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel, M. K., Markatos, N. C., & Cross, M. (1988). An assessment of flow oriented schemes for reducing ‘false diffusion’. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 26, 2279–2304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carey, C., Scanlon, T. J., & Fraser, S. M. (1993). SUCCA-an alternative scheme to reduce the effects of multidimensional false diffusion. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 17(5), 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karadimou, D. P., & Markatos, N. C. (2012). A novel flow oriented discretization scheme for reducing false diffusion in three-dimensional (3D) flows: An application in the indoor environment. Atmospheric Environment, 61, 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Versteeg, H. K., & Malalasekera, W. (1995). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics—The finite volume method. Essex, England: Longman Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spalding, D. B. (1978). Numerical computation of multiphase flow and heat-transfer. In C. Taylor, & K. Morgan (Eds.), Contribution to recent advances in numerical methods in fluids (pp. 139–167). Pineridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Markatos, N. C. (1983). Modelling of two-phase transient flow and combustion of granular propellants. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 12(6), 913–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spalding, D. B. (1981). A general-purpose computer program for multi-dimensional one or two-phase flow. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, XII, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, P. G., Launder, B. E., & Leschziner, M. A. (1985). Discretization of nonlinear convection processes: A broad-range comparison of four schemes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 48, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scanlon, T. J., Carey, C., & Fraser, S. M. (1993). SUCCA3D—an alternative scheme to false-diffusion in 3D flows. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 207, 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karadimou, D. P., & Markatos, N. C. (2018). Study of the numerical diffusion in computational calculations (pp. 65–78). London, UK: Intechopen Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gomma, A., Halim, M. A., & Elsaid, A. M. (2016). Experimental and numerical investigations of a triple-concentric tube heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 99, 1303–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Benavides, A., & Van Wachem, B. (2009). Eulerian-Eulerian prediction of dilute turbulent gas particle flow in a backward facing step. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 30, 452–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, F., Yu, S., & Lai, A. (2006). Modeling particle distribution and deposition in indoor environments with a new drift-flux model. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yakhot, V., Orszag, S. A., Thangam, S., Gatski, T. B., & Speziale, C. G. (1992). Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Physics of Fluids A, 4(7), 1510–1520.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Markatos, N. C. (1986). The mathematical modelling of turbulent flows. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 10, 190–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Argyropoulos & Markatos. (2015). Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(2), 693–732.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Padfield, T. Conservation physics. An online textbook in serial form. http://www.conservationphysics.org/atmcalc/atmoclc2.pdf.

  27. Wexler, A. (1983). ASHRAE Handbook: Thermodynamic properties of dry air, moist air and water and SI psychrometric charts (p. 360). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smagorinsky, J. (1963). General circulation experimental with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review, 93(3), 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karadimou, D. P., & Markatos, N. C. (2013). Two-phase transient mathematical modelling of indoor aerosol by means of a flow-oriented discretization scheme. In CD Proceedings of 10th HSTAM International Congress on Mechanics, Chania, Crete, May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  30. El Diasty, R., Fazio, P., & Budaiwi, I. (1992). Modelling of indoor air humidity: The dynamic behavior within an enclosure. Energy and Buildings, 19, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu, X. (2002). Modelling of heat and moisture transfer in buildings II, Applications to indoor thermal and moisture control. Energy and Buildings, 34, 1045–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu, X. (2003). Estimation of indoor moisture generation rate from measurement in buildings. Building and Environment, 38, 665–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma, X., Li, X., Shao, X., & Jiang, X. (2013). An algorithm to predict the transient moisture distribution for wall condensation under a steady flow field. Building and Environment, 67, 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mimouni, S., Foissac, A., & Lavieville, J. (2011). CFD modeling of wall steam condensation by a two-phase flow approach. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241, 4445–4455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Argyropoulos, et al. (2017). Mathematical modelling and computing simulation of toxic gas building infiltration. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 111, 687–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Isetti, C., Laurenti, L., & Ponticiello, A. (1988). Predicting vapour content of the indoor air and latent loads for air-conditioned environments: Effect of moisture storage capacity of the walls. Energy and Buildings, 12, 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Teodosiu, C., Hohota, R., Rusaouen, G., & Woloszyn, M. (2003). Numerical prediction of indoor air humidity and its effects on indoor environment. Building and Environment, 38, 655–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stavrakakis, G. M., Karadimou, D. P., Zervas, P. L., Sarimveis, H., & Markatos, N. C. (2011). Selection of window sizes for optimizing occupational comfort and hygiene based on computational fluid dynamics and neural networks. Building and Environmnet, 46, 298–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pu, L., Xiao, F., Li, Y., & Ma, Z. (2012). Effects of initial mist conditions on simulation accuracy of humidity distribution in an environmental chamber. Building and Environment, 47, 217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, J., Aizawa, H., & Yoshino, H. (2004). CFD prediction of surface condensation on walls and its experimental validation. Building and Environment, 39, 905–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Karabelas, S. J., & Markatos, N. C. (2008). Water vapor condensation in forced convection flow over an airfoil. Aerospace and Technology, 12, 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ishii, M., & Mishima, K. (1984). Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations. Nuclear Engineering and Design, (82), 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lee, S. L. (1987). Particle drag in a dilute turbulent two-phase suspension flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2(13), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hetsroni, G. (1989). Particles-turbulence interaction. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 5(15), 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. ASHRAE handbook-Fundamentals, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The second author (D. P. Karadimou) gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the State Scholarships Foundation of Greece through the ‘‘IKY Fellowships of Excellence for Postgraduate studies in Greece-SIEMENS’’ Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 15780, Athens, Greece

    N. C. Markatos & D. P. Karadimou

  2. Texas A&M University at Qatar, Education City, Doha, Qatar

    N. C. Markatos

Authors
  1. N. C. Markatos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. P. Karadimou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. C. Markatos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ACRI, The CFD Innovators, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Akshai Runchal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Markatos, N.C., Karadimou, D.P. (2020). The SUPER Numerical Scheme for the Discretization of the Convection Terms in Computational Fluid Dynamics Computations. In: Runchal, A. (eds) 50 Years of CFD in Engineering Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2670-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2670-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2669-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2670-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation