Skip to main content

Development of an Effective Computing Framework for Classification of Motor Imagery EEG Signals for Brain–Computer Interface

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Intelligence Techniques

Abstract

A brain–computer interface (BCI) utilizes  brain signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG) and provides a pathway for people to interact with external assistive devices. The objective of this work is to classify the tasks so that we can assist the disabled person in doing things on own way with the aid of BCI. The raw EEG signals have a chance of being affected with interference and hence have low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) which may lead to erroneous results. These EEG signals are decomposed into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) using different standard algorithms like empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and multivariate empirical mode decomposition (MEMD). Different features like skewness, k-nearest neighbour (kNN) entropy, sample entropy and permutation entropy are extracted from these IMFs which will significantly contribute to the classification of tasks. This work is carried out on the well-established BCI motor imagery data set, BCI competition IVa data set 1 which will support the analysis. These extracted features are subjected to classifiers like random forest, Naive Bayes and J48 classifiers. The classification accuracies have been recorded, and improved results are achieved using MEMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM (2002) Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 113(6):767–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jahankhani P, Kodogiannis V, Revett K (2006) EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and neural networks. In: IEEE John Vincent Atanasoff 2006 international symposium on modern computing (JVA’06)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qin L, Ding L, He B (2004) Motor imagery classification by means of source analysis for brain-computer interface applications. J Neural Eng 1(3):135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pijn JP, Van Neerven J, Noest A, da Silva FHL (1991) Chaos or noise in EEG signals; dependence on state and brain site. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 79(5):371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park C, Looney D, urRehman N, Ahrabian A, Mandic DP (2012) Classification of motor imagery BCI using multivariate empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21(1):10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaur P, Pachori RB, Wang H, Prasad G (2019) An automatic subject specific intrinsic mode function selection for enhancing two-class EEG based motor imagery-brain computer interface. IEEE Sens J

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allen J (1977) Short term spectral analysis, synthesis, and modification by discrete fourier transform. IEEE Trans Acoust, Speech, Signal Process 25(3):235–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daubechies I (1990) The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 36(5):961–1005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 454(1971):903–995

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandic DP, ur Rehman N, Wu Z, Huang NE (2013) Empirical mode decomposition-based time-frequency analysis of multivariate signals: the power of adaptive data analysis. IEEE Signal Process Mag 30(6):74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dutta S, Singh M, Kumar A (2018) Automated classification of non-motor mental task in electroencephalogram based brain-computer interface using multivariate autoregressive model in the intrinsic mode function domain. Biomed Signal Process Control 43:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaur P, Kaushik G, Pachori RB, Wang H, Prasad G (2019) Comparison analysis: single and multichannel EMD-based filtering with application to BCI. In: Machine intelligence and signal analysis. Springer, pp 107–118

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rehman N, Mandic DP (2009) Multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Proc R Soc A Math, Phys Eng Sci 466(2117):1291–1302

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Guan C, Ang KK, Chin ZY (2012) BCI competition IV-data set I: learning discriminative patterns for self-paced EEG-based motor imagery detection. Front Neurosci 6:7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta A, Agrawal R (2012) Relevant feature selection from EEG signal for mental task classification. In: Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer, pp 431–442

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kraskov A, Stögbauer H, Grassberger P (2004) Estimating mutual information. Phys Rev E 69(6):066138

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Azami H, Fernández A, Escudero J (2017) Refined multiscale fuzzy entropy based on standard deviation for biomedical signal analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 55(11):2037–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khushaba RN, Al-Jumaily A, Al-Ani A (2007) Novel feature extraction method based on fuzzy entropy and wavelet packet transform for myoelectric control. In: 2007 international symposium on communications and information technologies. IEEE, pp 352–357

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bandt C, Pompe B (2002) Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. Phys Rev Lett 88(17):174102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis DD (1998) Naive (bayes) at forty: the independence assumption in information retrieval. In: European conference on machine learning. Springer, pp 4–15

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pal M (2005) Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int J Remote Sens 26(1):217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hall MA (2000) Correlation-based feature selection of discrete and numeric class machine learning

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kohavi R et al (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Ijcai, vol 14. Montreal, Canada, pp 1137–1145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sri Ramya, P., Yashasvi, K., Anjum, A., Bhattacharyya, A., Pachori, R.B. (2020). Development of an Effective Computing Framework for Classification of Motor Imagery EEG Signals for Brain–Computer Interface. In: Jain, S., Sood, M., Paul, S. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence Techniques. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2620-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics