Skip to main content

Influencing Factors Analysis of Layer Penetration Fracturing in Thin Mud-Sandstone Interbeds of Daniudi Gas Field

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2019 (IFEDC 2019)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering ((SSGG))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2604 Accesses

Abstract

Bed He-1 and Shan-2 in Daniudi Gas Field are typical mud-sandstone interbeds. Controllable layer penetration fracturing technique is proposed to control extension of fractures in the formation without dry beds and water layers connected so to realize joint use of Bed He 1 and Shan 2. Combined with single well data, the thickness of the interlayer and the horizontal principal stress difference were compared and calculated to analyze the impact of barriers properties and controllable fracturing parameters on layer penetration fracturing. Involving factors like formation thickness and stress difference, the criteria of penetration fracturing is established and verified with temperature logging data. At last, an optimizing approach of controllable parameters on the basis of precise description of formation properties is proposed. Simulation results indicate that both barrier thickness and stress difference between pay zone and barrier would impede the vertical expansion of fractures. As a result, layer penetration fracturing is easy to conduct in formations with barriers less than 6 m in thickness and stress difference between pay zone and barrier smaller than 6 MPa. Besides, Parameters, involving fracturing fluid viscosity, injection rate and volume, the direction, location and diameter of perforation, should be optimized in hydraulic fracturing design. The established quantitative criteria in this paper is in good accordance with tested data. Such criteria serves as an important reference for fracturing optimization and design in similar wells, which is also a new trial for the stimulation of similar formations.

Copyright 2019, IFEDC Organizing Committee.

This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2019 International Field Exploration and Development Conference in Xi’an, China, 16–18 October, 2019.

This paper was selected for presentation by the IFEDC Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the IFEDC Technical Team and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the IFEDC Technical Committee its members. Papers presented at the Conference are subject to publication review by Professional Team of IFEDC Technical Committee. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of IFEDC Organizing Committee is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of IFEDC. Contact email: paper@ifedc.org.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Warpinski, N.R., Schmidt, R., Northrop, D.A.: In-situ stresses: the predominant influence on hydraulic fracture containment. J. Pet. Technol. 34(3), 653–664 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Naceur, K.B., Touboul, E.: Mechanisms controlling fracture-height growth in layered media. SPE Prod. Eng. 5(2), 142–150 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, S.Z., Ren, S.Q., Zhao, J.Z., Yang, L.X., Wang, Q.X., Chen, S.: The fracturing technique to limit hydraulic fracture height growth put into effect successfully in Xinjiang oil field. Paper SPE 39516, SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Delhi, India (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gu, H., Siebrits, E.: Effect of formation modulus contrast on hydraulic fracture height containment. SPE Prod. Oper. 23(2), 170–176 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haddad, M., Sepehrnoori, K.: Simulation of hydraulic fracturing in quasi-brittle shale formations using characterized cohesive layer: stimulation controlling factors. J. Unconv. Oil Gas Res. 9, 65–83 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao, J., Peng, Y., Li, Y., Xiao, W.: Analytical model for simulating and analyzing the influence of interfacial slip on fracture height propagation in shale gas layers. Environ. Earth Sci. 73(10), 5867–5875 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanna, A., Kotousov, A.: Controlling the height of multiple hydraulic fractures in layered media. SPE J. 21(1), 256–263 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daneshy, A.A.: Hydraulic fracture propagation in layered formations. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 18(1), 33–41 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanson, M.E., Shaffer, R.J., Anderson, G.D.: Effects of various parameters on hydraulic fracturing geometry. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 21(4), 435–443 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biot, M.A., Medlin, W.L., Masse, L.: Fracture penetration through an interface. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 23(6), 857–869 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Advani, S.H., Lee, J.K., Lee, T.S., Jinn, J.T., Choudhry, S.: Fracture mechanics modeling associated with layered rock and biomaterial interfaces. In: 28th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), American Rock Mechanics Association, Tucsan, Arizona (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, M.B., Bale, A.B., Britt, L.K., Klein, H.H., Siebrits, E., Dang, X.: Layered modulus effects on fracture propagation, proppant placement, and fracture modeling. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 71654, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, H., Chudnovsky, A., Dudley, J.W., Wong, G.K.: A map of fracture behavior in the vicinity of an interface. In: 6th North America Rock Mechanics Symposium (NARMS), American Rock Mechanics Association, Houston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51504042), and the Sub-project under National Science and Technology Support Program (No. 2016ZX05048-001-04-LH), and the Foundation Key Projects of Sichuan Education Department (No. 18ZA0063).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Xiao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Zw., Xiao, Y., He, W., Wu, X., Huang, Wq. (2020). Influencing Factors Analysis of Layer Penetration Fracturing in Thin Mud-Sandstone Interbeds of Daniudi Gas Field. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2019. IFEDC 2019. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2485-1_274

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2485-1_274

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2484-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2485-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics