Abstract
Cultural heritage is the benefaction of our bygone civilization, including physical and intangible properties that express the ways of living developed by a community. Those properties available convey the culture they followed and pass on the information from generations to generations, help the common people to understand, preserve and educate them to inherit the culture that is feasible and makes life easier. The physical properties might be ruined for various reasons. The deliberate act for preserving those matters from damage is by reconstruction. As the digital era is employing everywhere, technology can be used to document the fragments obtained in the excavation sites to be maintained for research purpose, educating and rebuilding without affecting the original fragments. This paper describes about different techniques used to classify the collected fragments into similar sets based on texture, colour and rearrange them to obtain its original structure and also in identifying the missing parts and reconstruct it accordingly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp203h-ss16/2016/02/10/how-do-archaeologist-find-sites
Rasheed, N.A., Nordin, M.J.: Classification and reconstruction for the archaeological fragments (2018)
Calin, M., Damian, G., Popescu, T., Manea, R., Erghelegiu, B., Salagean, T.: 3D modeling for digital preservation of Romanian heritage monuments (2015)
Rua, H., Gil, A.: Automation in heritage—parametric and associative design strategies to model inaccessible monuments: the case-study of eighteenth century Lisbon Aguas Livers. Aqueduct, Digital Applications on Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (2014)
Belenguer, C.S., Vidal, E.V.: Archaeological fragment characterization and 3D reconstruction based on projective GPU depth maps (2012)
Tsirliganis, N., Pavlidis, G., Koutsoudis, A., Papadopoulou, D., Tsompanopoulos, A., Stavroglou, K., Loukou, Z., Chamzas, C.: Archiving 3D cultural objects with surface point-wise database information. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission (2002)
Johnson, R.A., Solis, A.: Using photogrammetry to interpret human action on Neolithic monument boulders in Ireland’s Cavan Burren (2016)
Karauguz, G., Corumluoglu, O., Kalayc, I., Asri, I: 3D photogrammetric model of Eflatunpinar monument at the age of Hittite empire in Anatolia (2009)
Menna, F., Agrafiotis, P., Georgopoulos, A.: State of the art and applications in archaeological underwater3D recording and mapping (2018)
Belenguer, C.S., Vendrell Vidal, E.: An efficient technique to recompose archaeological artifacts from fragments (2014)
Papaioannou, G., Karabassi, E.-A., Theoharis, T.: Virtual archaeologist: assembling the past. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21(2), 53–59 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/38.909015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Priyadarshini, R., Soumya, A. (2020). Survey: Classification and Reconstruction of Archaeological Artefacts. In: Mandal, J., Mukhopadhyay, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Global AI Congress 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1112. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2188-1_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2188-1_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2187-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2188-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)