Skip to main content

Aligning Learning Materials and Assessment with Course Learning Outcomes in MOOCs Using Data Mining Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Integrations of Intelligent Methods

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are considered as a new trend in the domain of e-learning. They provide a platform for supporting learners from different places and at any time with highly scalable and interesting learning experience. As a result, this led to continuous increase in the rate of learners with different knowledge, background, and skills. Therefore, supporting learners with adapted courses’ materials and assessments based on learning outcomes is considered as a crucial concept for enhancing MOOCs. This paper presents a framework for delivering learning materials and generating assessments based on intended learning outcomes (ILOs) using both support vector machine (SVM) and fuzzy logic algorithm. The SVM is mainly used to classify learning materials according to learning outcomes. On the other hand, the fuzzy logic algorithm is mainly used to generate examinations and quizzes automatically based on learners’ achievements and scores. Accordingly, the proposed framework can be used to enable learners to achieve learning outcomes by following adapted learning materials and automatically generated examinations. To validate the proposed framework, a prototype was developed and evaluated. The results of classifying both learning materials and assessment show interesting results. For instance, the results of classification process for learning materials were related to a number of factors such as accuracy rate for SVM classifier which was 71.5%, the weighted average for TP rate = 0.715, FN rate = 0.285, FP rate = 0.028, TN rate = 0.972, precision = 0.738, recall = 0.715, F-measure = 0.678, and finally ROC area = 0.939. In addition, fuzzy logic technique provided promising results to deliver examinations with a difficulty levels that are compatible with the current level of the learner depending on his grade point average (GPA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jona, K., Naidu, S.: MOOCs: emerging research. Distance Educ. 35(2), 141–144 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altunay, D.: The role of open educational resources in English language learning and teaching. Int. J. Comput. Lang. Learn. Teach. 3(2), 97–107 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emanuel, E.J.: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature 503(7476), 2013 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Der Woert, N., et al.: 2014 Open Education trend report: a publication by the Open Education Special Interest Group. Utrecht, Netherlands (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Onah, D.F.O., Sinclair, J.: Massive open online courses—an adaptive learning framework. In: 9th International Technology, Education and Development, 2015, vol. INTED2015, pp. 1258–1266

    Google Scholar 

  6. (Nish) Sonwalkar, N.: The first adaptive MOOC: a case study on pedagogy framework and scalable cloud architecture—part I. In: MOOCs FORUM, vol. 1, No. P, pp. 22–29 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen, Y., Rushkin, I., Ang, A., Federicks, C., Tingley, D., Blink, M.J.: Designing adaptive assessments in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale - L@S ’17, 2017, pp. 233–236

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gosling, D., Moon, J.: How to use learning outcomes and assessment criteria, pp. 1–48 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedland, G., Knipping, L., Tapia, E.: Web based lectures produced by AI supported classroom teaching. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholas, J.S., Francis, F.S.: Adaptive MOOCs to foster personalized learning, pp. 12–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaya, M., Fidan, G., Toroslu, I.: Sentiment analysis of Turkish political news. In: Proceedings—2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2012. pp. 174–180 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rushkin, I., et al.: Adaptive assessment experiment in a HarvardX MOOC. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ewais, A., Abu Samra, D.: Adaptive MOOCs: a framework for adaptive course based on intended learning outcomes. In: IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications (ICKEA 2017) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hmedna, B., El Mezouary, A., Baz, O.: Identifying and tracking learning styles in MOOCs: A neural networks approach. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 520(2), 125–134 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alzaghoul, A., Tovar, E.: A proposed framework for an adaptive learning of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). In: 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal, S., Jain, N., Dholay, S.: Adaptive testing and performance analysis using naive Bayes classifier. Proc. Comput. Sci. 45(C), 70–75 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ardchir, S., Talhaoui, M.A., Azzouazi, M.: Towards an adaptive learning framework for MOOCs. In: Aïmeur, E., Ruhi, U., Weiss, M. (eds.) E-Technologies: Embracing the Internet of Things : 7th International Conference, MCETECH 2017, Ottawa, ON, Canada, May 17–19, 2017, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 236–251 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á.: iMOOC platform: Adaptive MOOCs. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hu, Z., Zhang, M., Li, X., Wang, Z., Zhu, J.: Structured Knowledge Tracing Models for Student Assessment on Coursera, pp. 209–212 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baneres, D., Caballe, S., Clariso, R.: Towards a learning analytics support for intelligent tutoring systems on MOOC platforms. In: Proceedings—2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bingham, J.: Guide to developing learning outcomes (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jenkins, A., Unwin, D.: How to write learning outcomes. Retrieved February, vol. 5, p. 2008 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pilli, O., Admiraal, W.: Students ’ learning outcomes in massive open online courses (MOOCs): some suggestions for course design. J. Higher Educ. 7(1), 46–71 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yildirim, S.G., Baur, S.W.: Development of Learning Taxonomy for an Undergraduate Course in Architectural Engineering Program, pp. 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Agnantis, K., Alexiadis, A., Refanidis, I.: COURSR2: an integrated time management system for lifelong learners. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hashim, H., Salam, S., Nurul, S., Syafiatun, N.: The designing of adaptive self-assessment activities in second language learning using massive open online courses (MOOCs). Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Todi, A., et al.: Classification of E-Commerce Data Using Data Mining, no. 3, pp. 550–554 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramdass, D., Seshasai, S.: Document Classification for Newspaper Articles, pp. 1–12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Aidaroos, K.M., Bakar, A.A., Othman, Z.: Medical data classification with Naive Bayes Approach.pdf. Inf. Technol. J. 11(9), 1166–1174 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rajeswari, R.P., Juliet, K.: Text classification for student data set using Naive Bayes classifier and KNN classifier. Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol. 43(1), 8–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roy, D., et al.: Synthesis of clustering techniques in educational data mining. In: ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cuong, N.D.H., Arch-Int, N., Arch-Int, S.: FUSE: a fuzzy-semantic framework for personalizing learning recommendations. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Khatri, M.: A survey of Naïve Bayesian algorithms for similarity in recommendation systems 2(5), 217–219 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.N.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bhavsar, H., Panchal, M.H. : A Review on Support Vector Machine for Data Classification (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic. In: Computational Complexity: Theory, Techniques, and Applications (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Milano, B.: Adaptive learning featured in HarvardX Course. Sci. Technol. (2017) [Online]. Available: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/02/adaptive-learning-featured-in-harvardx-course/. Accessed: 24 April 2019

  38. Rosen, Y., et al.: The effects of adaptive learning in a massive open online course on learners’ skill development. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, pp. 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Leony, D., Delgado-Kloos, C.: Towards an outcome-based discovery and filtering of MOOCs using moocrank. In: Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Williams, J.J., Rafferty, A.N., Maldonado, S., Ang, A., Tingley, D., Kim, J.: MOOClets: a framework for dynamic experimentation and personalization. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Learning, @ Scale—L@S ’17 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Teixeira, A., Mota, J., García-Cabot, A., García-Lopéz, E., De-Marcos, L.: A new competence-based approach for personalizing MOOCs in a mobile collaborative and networked environment Un nuevo enfoque basado en competencias para la personalización de MOOCs en un entorno móvil colaborativo en red. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. a Distancia 19(1), 143–160 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Louhab, F.E., Bahnasse, A., Talea, M.: Towards an adaptive formative assessment in context-aware mobile learning. Proc. Comput. Sci. 135, 441–448 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Umer, R., Susnjak, T., Mathrani, A., Suriadi, S.: Prediction of students’ dropout in MOOC environment. Int. J. Knowl. Eng. 3(2), 43–47 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sproul, R.C.: The Truth of the Cross (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tang, Y., Zhang, Y.Q., Chawla, N.V.: SVMs modeling for highly imbalanced classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 39(1), 281–288 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yadav, S.K., Bharadwaj, B., Pal, S.: Mining education data to predict student’s retention: a comparative study. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Ewais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ewais, A., Awad, M., Hadia, K. (2020). Aligning Learning Materials and Assessment with Course Learning Outcomes in MOOCs Using Data Mining Techniques. In: Hatzilygeroudis, I., Perikos, I., Grivokostopoulou, F. (eds) Advances in Integrations of Intelligent Methods. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 170. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1918-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics