Abstract
The Australian Federal Government Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI) was a voluntary carbon offsets scheme. It allowed land managers to earn carbon credits by changing land use or management practices to store carbon. The Carbon Farming Futures (CCF) program ran from 2012 to 2017 to identify where farmers can boost productivity and profitability; improve soil and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Action on The Ground program was one component of the CCF which aimed to assist landholders in trialing new technologies and practices. Laboratory and field plot research indicated that ploughing nutrients into the soil with crop residues/stubble increased the amount of soil carbon stored. Our project aimed to test if this was possible using farm equipment. The challenge was to design experiments with plots large enough to be managed with commercial farm machinery that deliver enough precision to test different treatments.
We tested carbon sequestration methods in 14 fields in different bioregions. Soil variability was estimated using two electromagnetic surveying instruments. Randomized block experiments were established in fields after areas of similar soil were identified by geostatistics and finite mixture models.
The field experiments failed to reproduce the high sequestration rates of the earlier, more controlled, research. We describe one experiment in this chapter and propose reasons for this failure to sequester carbon. The hybrid demonstration/research approach is applicable in many other situations where agricultural policy or practice change are to be tested at farm scale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Ferderal Department of Agriculture: The carbon farming initiative (2019). Available from: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/water/policy/carbon-farming- initiative
Australian Government – Department of Agriculture. Action on the ground. 2017.; Available from: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/ag-farm- food/climatechange/carbonfarmingfutures/action-on-the-ground
Baldock, J.A., et al.: Quantifying the allocation of soil organic carbon to biologically significant fractions. Soil Res. 51(8), 561 (2013)
Kirkby, C.A., et al.: Inorganic nutrients increase humification efficiency and C- sequestration in an annually cropped soil. PLoS One. 11(5), e0153698 (2016)
McNeill, J.D.: TN 5; Electrical conductivity of soils and rocks, p. 20. Geonics Ltd, Mississauga (1980)
McNeill, J.: TN-6 Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Geonics Ltd, Mississauga (1980)
Heil, K., Schmidhalter, U.: The application of EM38: determination of soil parameters, selection of soil sampling points and use in agriculture and archaeology. Sensors (Basel). 17(11), (2017)
Doolittle, J.A., Brevik, E.C.: The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soils studies. Geoderma. 223, 33–45 (2014)
Corwin, D., Lesch, S.: Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 46(1), 11–43 (2005)
Pebesma, E.J.: gstat: spatial and spatio-temporal geostatistical modelling, prediction and simulation. R package version 1.1.6 (2018)
R Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2014)
Cressie, N.C.A.: Statistics for spatial data. Wiley (1993)
Jenks, G.F., Caspall, F.C.: Error on choroplethic maps: definition, measurement, and A.o.A.G. reduction. Annals. 61(2), 217–244 (1971). Error on choroplethic maps: definition, measurement, reduction. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 1971. 61: p. 217–244
Hartigan, J.A.: Clustering algorithms. Wiley, New York (1975)
McLachlan, G.J., Peel, D.: Finite mixture models. Wiley, New York (2000)
Meng, X.-L., Rubin, D.B.: Maximim liklehood estimation via the ECM algorithm: a general framework. Biometrika. 80(2), 267–278 (1993)
Benaglia, T., et al.: mixtools: An R package for analyzing finite mixture models. J. Stat. (2009)
Baldock, J.A., et al.: Predicting contents of carbon and its component fractions in Australian soils from diffuse reflectance mid-infrared spectra. Soil Res. 51(8), 577 (2013)
Gilmour, A.R., Thompson, R., Cullis, B.R.: AI, an efficient algorithm for REML estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics. 51, 1440–1450 (1995)
Butler, D., asreml: fits the linear mixed model. 2019.
Chan, K.Y., et al.: Soil carbon dynamics under different cropping and pasture management in temperate Australia: results of three long-term experiments. Soil Res. 49(4), 320–328 (2011)
Viscarra Rossel, R.A., et al.: Baseline map of organic carbon in Australian soil to support national carbon accounting and monitoring under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20(9), 2953–2970 (2014)
Hauschild, M., et al.: Life cycle assessment theory and practice. Springer (2018)
Rudolph, S., et al.: Spatial discontinuity analysis, a novel geostatistical algorithm for on-farm experimentation. In: 13th international conference on precision agriculture. International Society for Precision Agriculture, St Lois (2016)
Marchant, B., et al.: Establishing the precision and robustness of farmers’ crop experiments. Field Crop. Res. 230, 31–45 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hume, I.H. (2020). Policy into Practice; Statistics the Forgotten Gatekeeper. In: Rahman, A. (eds) Statistics for Data Science and Policy Analysis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1735-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1735-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1734-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1735-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)