Skip to main content

A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Computing and Intelligent Engineering

Abstract

Successful implementation of a software product entirely depends on the quality of the software developed. However, prediction of the quality of a software product prior to its implementation in real-world applications presents significant challenges to the software developer during the process of development. A limited spectrum of research in this area has been reported in the literature as of today. Most of the researchers have concentrated their research work on software quality prediction using various machine learning techniques. Another aspect pertaining to software quality prediction is that the prediction must be achieved in the earlier stages of software development life cycle in order to reduce the amount of effort required by the developer in course of the development of a software product. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive review of machine learning techniques which have been used to predict software quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Puri, A., Singh, H.: Genetic algorithm based approach for finding faulty modules in open source software systems. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Surv. (IJCSES) 5(3), 29–40 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adline, A., Ramachandran, M.: Predicting the software quality using the method of genetic algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng. 3(2), 390–398 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Azar, D., Vybibhal, J.: An ant colony optimization algorithm to improve software quality prediction models: case of class stability. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(4), 388–393 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pattnaik, S., Pattanayak, B.K.: A survey on machine learning techniques used for software quality prediction. Int. J. Reasoning-Based Intell. Syst. 12(1/2), 3–14 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kapur, P.K., Khatri, S.K., Goswami, D.N.: A generalized dynamic integration software reliability growth model based on neural network approach. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Reliability, Safety and Quality Engineering, pp. 831–838 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karunanithi, N., Whitley, D., Malaiya, Y.K.: Using neural networks in reliability prediction. Softw. IEEE 9(4), 53–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Pandya, A.S., More, H.B.: A neural network approach for predicting software development faults. In: Proceedings of Software Reliability Engineering in 3rd International Symposium on IEEE, pp. 83–89 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner, S.: A bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity-based quality model. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(11), 1230–1241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Radinski, L.: A conceptual bayesian net model for integrated software quality prediction. Ann. UMCA Informatica 11(4), 49–60 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abouela, M., Benedicenti, L.: A bayesian network based XP process modelling. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. (IJSEA) 1(3), 1–15 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amasaki, S., Takagi, Y., Mizuno, O., Kikuno, T.: Constructing a bayesian belief network to predict final quality in embedded system development. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 8(6), 1134–1141 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mittal, H., Bhatia, P., Goswami, P.: Software quality assessment based on Fuzzy logic technique. Int. J. Soft Comput. Appl. (IJSCA) 1(3), 105–112 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed, M.A., AL-Jamini, H.A.: Machine learning approaches for predicting software maintainability: a Fuzzy based transparent model. IET Softw. 7(6), 317–326 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Challa, J.S., Paul, A., Dada, Y., Nerella, V., Stivastava, P.R., Singh, A.P.: Integrated software quality evaluation: a Fuzzy multi-criteria approach. J. Inf. Process Syst. (JIPS) 7(3), 473–518 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Idri, A., Abra, A.: A fuzzy logic based measures for software project similarity: validation and possible improvements. In: Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Software Metrics, pp. 85–96. IEEE, England, UK (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pattnaik, S., Pattanayak, B.K., Patnail, S.: Prediction of software quality using neuro-fuzzy model. Int. J. Intell. Enterp. (IJIE) 5(3), 292–307 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Seliya, N.: Software quality classification modelling using SPRINT decision tree algorithm. Int. J. Artif Intell. Tools (IJAIT) 12(3), 207–225 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Shah, R.M., Allen, E.B.: Improved tree-based models for software quality with principal component analysis. In: Proceedings of Software Engineering Reliability Engineering, ISSRE 2000 of 11th International Symposium on IEEE, pp. 198–209 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Seliya, N.: Tree based software quality estimation models for fault prediction. In: Proceedings of Software Metrics of Eighth IEEE Symposium, pp. 203–214 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta, R.: Software defects prediction using Support vector machine. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 1(1), 39–48 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shankar, K., Kannan, S., Jennifer, P.: Prediction of code fault using naive bayes and SVM classifiers. Middle East J. Sci. Res. (MEJSR) 20(1), 108–113 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Selvaraj, P.A., Thangaraj, P.: Support vector machine for software defect detection. Int. J. Eng. Technol. Res. (IJETRE) 1(2), 68–76 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reshi, J.A., Sing, S.: Predicting software defects through SVM: an empirical approach. Int. J. Sci. Res. Dev. 5, 1835–1838 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rashid, E., Patnaik, S., Bhattacherjee, V.: Software quality estimation using machine learning case-based reasoning technique. Int. J. Comput. Appl. (IJCA) 58(14), 43–48 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Ganesan, K., Allen, E.B., Ross, F.D., Munikoti, R., Goel, N., Nandi, A.: Predicting fault-prone modules with case-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of Software Reliability Engineering, The Eighth International Symposium on IEEE, 27–35 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rashid, E., Bhattacherjee, V., Patnaik, S.: The application of case-based reasoning to estimation of software development effort. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inform. (IJCSI) 1(3), 20–34 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Seliya, N., Sundaresh, N.: An empirical study of predicting software fault with case-based reasoning. Proc. Softw. Qual. J. Springer Sci. 14(2), 85–111 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev K. Cowlessur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cowlessur, S.K., Pattnaik, S., Pattanayak, B.K. (2020). A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Prediction. In: Pati, B., Panigrahi, C., Buyya, R., Li, KC. (eds) Advanced Computing and Intelligent Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1089. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1483-8_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1483-8_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1482-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1483-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics