Skip to main content

Inflation and Household Welfare: Evidence from Bangladesh

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bangladesh's Macroeconomic Policy

Abstract

Inflation in Bangladesh is historically dominated by food inflation. Since food consumption constitutes a major part of the consumption basket of the people, inflation might have detrimental effect on household welfare. This chapter assesses the impact of inflation on different household groups such as day laborers and fixed-salaried households as well as other income groups. For this purpose, group-specific consumer price indexes (CPIs) have been estimated for different groups of households, using respective weights attached to their consumption baskets. Some stylized facts have emerged from the analysis. Relatively poorer households face higher inflation than non-poorer households and day  laborers, and fixed income household groups face higher food inflation than non-food inflation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recently Bangladesh changed the base year for estimating inflation to 2005–2006 from its earlier base of 1995–1996. We reported/estimated inflation using 2005–2006 as the base year.

  2. 2.

    The potential migrants, however, may not include the hard-core and the lowest income rural households including the elderly, disadvantaged, disabled and poor female headed households since these households probably would not have the minimum assets needed and social contacts required for migration to urban areas and big cities.

  3. 3.

    The price per kg of medium quality rice varies substantially from the price of coarse rice in urban areas. One possible explanation could be that the medium quality rice available in the rural areas is perhaps inferior to the ones available in the urban areas, and thus the prices may not be strictly comparable.

  4. 4.

    One may argue that the welfare gain in society as a whole is somewhat ambiguous since a rise in wages would have a negative welfare effect on the employers. It may, however, be argued that the labor-employing households are invariably better off than the labor-supplying households and are fewer in number. Hence, from the social point of view, the trade-off is welfare enhancing and worth accepting.

References

  • ADB. (2008). Food prices and inflation in Developing Asia: Is poverty reduction coming to an end? Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albanesi, S. (2001). Inflation and inequality (Luxembourg income study working paper no. 323). Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, G. L., & Stephenson, J. B. (1974). Inflation and the redistribution of wealth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. K. (2013). Impact of rural employment guarantee schemes on seasonal labor markets: Optimum compensation and workers’ welfare. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S., & Esaki, H. Y. (1978). Macroeconomic activity and income distribution in the postwar United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 604–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, E., & Urani, A. (1995). Inflation and unemployment as determinants of inequality in Brazil: The 1980s. In Reform, recovery, and growth: Latin America and the Middle East (pp. 151–176). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1998). Farm productivity and rural poverty in India. The Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 62–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2009). The impact of rising food prices on household welfare in India. Berkley: Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1989). Rice prices and income distribution in Thailand: A non-parametric analysis. The Economic Journal, 99(395), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmas, J., Huffman, G. W., & Wynne, M. A. (2000). Inequality, inflation, and central bank independence. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 33(1), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., & Fischer S. (2000). Inflation and the poor (NBER working paper 2335). National Bureau of Economic Research, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2008). The state of food and agriculture 2008. Rome: Food & Agriculture Org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F. H., Leite, P. G., & Litchfield, J. A. (2008). The rise and fall of Brazilian inequality: 1981–2004. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 12(S2), 199–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., & Modigliani, F. (1978). Towards an understanding of the real effects and costs of inflation. Review of World Economics, 114(4), 810–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., & Rafiq, F. (2014). Global commodity price volatility and domestic inflation: Impact on the financial sector in Bangladesh. In M. K. Mujeri & W. Mahmud (Eds.), Adjusting to global economic volatility. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanic, M., & Martin, W. (2014). Short-and long-run impacts of food price changes on poverty. Policy Research Working Paper, 7011. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D., & Parkin, M. (1975). Inflation: A survey. The Economic Journal, 85(340), 741–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortaza, M. G., & Hasnayen, S. (2008). Inflation accounting across income groups: Does inflation hurt the poor more in Bangladesh? Bangladesh Bank Quarterly, 5(3), 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri, M. (1995). On the measurement of real wages in high inflation. Research and Economic Planning, 25(3), 497–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2000). Prices, wages and poverty in rural India: What lessons do the time series data hold for policy? Food Policy, 25(3), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., & Dutt, G. (1999). Growth and Poverty in Rural India (Policy Research Working Paper). The World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/620321468773982302/Growth-and-poverty-in-rural-India

  • Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (1998). Monetary policy and the well-being of the poor (No. w6793). National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics, B.B.O. (2005/2010). Household income and expenditure survey, 2005 and 2010. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. J. P., & Yu, J. (2012). Inflation and income inequality: Is food inflation different? (No. 12–147). International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Food price increases in South Asia, national responses and regional dimensions. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Required sample size for wage rate survey

To decide about a nationally representative sample of wage workers, we apply the following formula:

$$ {N}_c={Z}^2\left[P\left(1-P\right)/{d}^2\right]\ast def $$

Here Nc represents the number of workers to be interviewed, and def represents design effect. For household survey, def is usually considered to be between 1.5 and 2. Here we assume it 1.5 and consider Z at 10% level of significance, precision d = 0.1 at 10% level. Here P is the proportion of households having specific type of workers (see Tables 2.6 and 2.7; Source: HIES 2010 and LFS 2010). Therefore, the required number of workers would be N = 193 from each division. As we have decided to conduct the survey in all seven divisions to make the sample representative, thus, a total of 1351 respondents (wage workers) were interviewed.

Table 2.6 Estimated sample size for different groups
Table 2.7 Sample size distribution across regions
Table 2.8 Definitions of different household groups
Table 2.9 Weights in food baskets

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hossain, M., Mujeri, M.K. (2020). Inflation and Household Welfare: Evidence from Bangladesh. In: Hossain, M. (eds) Bangladesh's Macroeconomic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1244-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1244-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1243-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1244-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics