Abstract
Flexibility in manipulators/robots is due to both joint and link flexibility that makes up the system. Flexible robots are preferred over conventional rigid robots in applications like invasive surgeries, space applications, and industries due to their prompt response, low energy requirement, faster operational speeds, and low weight to power ratio. Due to inherent flexibility, accurate positioning of end-effector in required path is difficult. Moreover flexibility of link makes it an infinite degree freedom system and mathematics is very involved. To simplify the problem and get reasonable results, flexible links are modeled based on Euler–Bernoulli beam theory and Assumed mode method is implemented. Joint flexibility is because of small clearances that are inherently present in the joint, because of both manufacturing and assembling constraints, these clearances cause sudden impacts between the joining parts (journal and bearing) resulting in impact force generation as the joints are manipulated. Resulting impact (hertzian contact) forces increase the overall input torque required to manipulate the end-effector according to our wish. This paper’s objective is to build a dynamic model of a two-link RR type planar manipulator with link and joint flexibility, and determine the maximum error of tip position between a robot with/without flexibility, as the end effect or travels in required vertical path with payload. Further, apply orthodox control strategies (PD, PI, and PID) to reduce the error. The end-effector carries a payload equals its links mass. Using MSC Adams and MATLAB softwares, a co-simulation approach is developed. Both the controllers (PI, PID) radically reduced error through several iterations, PID control strategy achieved better results than PI controller and by both approaches, more than 60% of the positional error is reduced.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moallem M (1996) Control and design of flexible-link manipulators. Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy at Concordia University, Montreal, Qudbec, Canada, December
Mahamood RM, Aweda JO, Ajao KR, Popoola OT, Odusote JK (2015) PID controller design for two link flexible manipulator. LAUTECH J Eng Technol 9(2):17–22
Zhang D, Zhou S (2006) Dynamic analysis of flexible-link and flexible-joint robots. Appl Math Mech 27(5):695–704
Ahmad MA, Mohamed Z (2010) Modelling and simulation of vibration and input tracking control of a single-link flexible manipulator. Pertanika J Sci Technol 18(1):61–76
Abdullahi AM, Mohamed Z, Muhammad M, Bature AA (2013) Vibration and tip deflection control of a single-link flexible manipulator. Int J Instrum Control Syst (IJICS) 3(4), 17–27 (October)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank University Grants Commission, South Eastern Region (SERO), Hyderabad for sponsoring this project, as this work is being carried out from UGC Sanctioned Minor Research Project No. F-MRP-6758/16 (SERO/UGC) dated June 30, 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Madhusudan Raju, E., Krishna, L.S.R., Abbas, M. (2020). Control of End-Effector of a Multi-link Robot with Joint and Link Flexibility. In: Narasimham, G., Babu, A., Reddy, S., Dhanasekaran, R. (eds) Recent Trends in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1124-0_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1124-0_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1123-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1124-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)