Skip to main content

Understanding the Systems Solution Landscape

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Systems Sciences
  • 2812 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, a generic model for understanding the relationship between a situation responding to the situation and the system assets that are instantiated in the response is explored. This model can be applied for all types of engineering solutions. Working towards a solution (response) first involves understanding the problem or opportunity situation space, the potential response, and the system assets that are available or can be developed to provide a response. Thus, the first step involves systems thinking where the underlying properties and relationships are established and understood. The thinking activity is followed up with acting activities for planning, developing, and applying the response in order to change the situation to a desired situation state. A paradigm for coupling thinking and acting activities is provided as a guide. Organizing the development, deployment, and sustainment of systems (in particular software systems) is a major challenge of the solution landscape. Consequently, the properties of an international standard on systems engineering as well as a standard on “essence” are shown to be viable approaches to addressing the systems solution landscape. A major contributing factor to complexity in system solutions is related to the selection of an appropriate architecture as well as following the right approach to change management. Finally, a systems solution approach, leading to a lightweight architecture in organizing and operating enterprises, is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff RL (1971) Towards a system of systems concepts. Manag Sci 17(11):661–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold S, Lawson H (2004) Viewing systems from a business management perspective, systems engineering. J Int Counc Syst Eng 7(3):229–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chaptman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bellinger G (2004). http://www.systems-thinking.org and http://www.systemswiki.org/

  • Boardman J, Sauser B (2008) Systems thinking – coping with 21st century problems. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm B (2015) Principles and rationale for successful systems and software processes, software engineering in the systems context, systems series, volume 7. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J R (1987) An organic design for command and control, a discourse on winning and losing. Unpublished lecture notes, Maxwell AFB, Alabama University

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks F (1975) The mythical man-month. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1993) Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice – includes a 30 year retrospective. John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson M et al (2012) A discipline of mathematical systems modelling, systems series, vol 2. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (1998) Rethinking the fifth discipline: learning within the unknowable. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Carson ER (1988) Dealing with complexity: an introduction to the theory and application of systems science, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J W (1975) Collected papers of Jay W. Forrester. Pegasus Communications

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotze J, Jensen-Waud A (2013) Beyond alignment: applying systems thinking in architecting enterprises, systems series, vol 3. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard R (2015) Lessons from the Unity of architecting, software engineering in the systems context, systems series, vol 7. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE 1471 (2000) Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineering, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207 (2008) Systems and software engineering – software life cycle processes. International Standardization Organization/International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 (2002, 2008, 2015) Systems and software engineering – system life cycle processes. International Standardization Organization/International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 (2011) Systems and software engineering – architecture description. International Standardization Organization/International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson I, Lawson H (2015) Software engineering in the systems context, systems series, vol 7. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson I et al (2013) The Essence of software engineering – applying the SEMAT Kernel. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H (1990) Philosophies for engineering computer-based systems. IEEE Comput 23(12):52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H (2002) Rebirth of the computer industry. Commun ACM 45(6):25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H (2010) A journey through the systems landscape, systems series, vol 1. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H (2012) Experiences and reflections, appearing in reflections on the history of computing – preserving memories and sharing stories. In: Tatnall A (ed) IFIP advances in information and communication technology. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H (2018) The march into the black hole of complexity. Commun ACM 61(5):43–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H, Martin J (2008) On the use of concepts and principles for improving systems engineering practice. In: Proceedings of the INCOSE international conference, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Monat J, Gannon T (2017) Using systems thinking to solve real-world problems, systems series, volume 8. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • OMG Essence (2014) Kernel and language for software engineering methods version 1.0

    Google Scholar 

  • SEBoK Editorial Board (2020) The guide to the systems engineering body of knowledge (SEBoK), v2.2, R J Cloutier (editor in chief). www.sebokwiki.org. Accessed 1 Nov 2020

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art & practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard S (2015) Complexity, systems and software, software engineering in the systems context, systems series, vol 7. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto H (2014) Architecting systems-concepts, principles and practice, systems series, vol 6. College Publications, Kings College

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Revised edition. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver W (1948) Science and complexity. Am Sci 36:536–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg GM (2001) An introduction to general systems thinking, 1st edn. Dorset House, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold Bud Lawson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Adrian lawson

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lawson, H.B. (2021). Understanding the Systems Solution Landscape. In: Metcalf, G.S., Kijima, K., Deguchi, H. (eds) Handbook of Systems Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0720-5_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics