Skip to main content

A Generalized Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Management, Analytics and Innovation

Abstract

This paper presents a novel machine learning approach backed by ensembling machine learning algorithms to build landslide susceptibility maps. The results reveal that this approach outperforms prior machine learning-based approaches in terms of precision, recall, and F-score for landslide susceptibility modeling. In this research, three ensemble machine learning algorithms were tested for their applicability in landslide prediction domain, namely, random forest, rotation forest, and XGBoost. A comparison between these ensemble models and the machine learning algorithms used in previous researches was also performed. In order to evaluate the model’s ability to generalize results, two different study areas were used in this study, which are Ratnapura district in Sri Lanka and Glenmalure in Ireland. Several landslide conditioning features including land use, landform, vegetation index, elevation, overburden, aspect, curvature, catchment area, drainage density, distance to water streams, soil, bedrock condition, lithology and rainfall prepared by surveying, remote sensing, and deriving from Digital Elevation Model (DEM) were utilized in building the spatial database. Importantly, this study introduces new landslide conditioning factors like overburden and water catchment areas which have good importance values. Further, research applies dynamic factors like rainfall and vegetation index for susceptibility map building, by making use of remote sensing data which is updated periodically. The study emphasizes the capability of ensemble approaches in generalizing results well for both study areas which inherit completely different environmental properties, and its ability to provide a scalable map building mechanism. Also, useful insights and guidelines are also provided for fellow researchers who are interested in building susceptibility maps using machine learning approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karunaratne, M. (2017). Sri Lanka floods and landslides (p. 2017). Colombo: IOM Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U. W. L. Chandradasa, Mallawatantri, A., & Wijethunga, R. (2009). Sri Lanka national report on disaster risk, poverty and human development relationship. Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Subhashini, L. D. C. S., & Premaratne, H. L. (2013). Landslide prediction using artificial neural networks. In ICSBE-2012: International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, Kandy, Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pham, B. T., Bui, D. T., Pourghasemi, H. R., Indra, P., & Dholakia, M. B. (2015). Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: a comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2009). Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. International Journal Physics Sciences, 3(11), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hong, H., Liu, J., Bui, D. T., Pradhan, B., Acharya, T. D., Pham, B. T., et al. (2017). Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, H., Tang, H. &, Zeng, Z. (2013). Landslide deformation prediction based on recurrent neural network. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oh, H.-J. & Lee, S. (2017). Shallow Landslide susceptibility modeling using the data mining models artificial neural network and boosted tree.

    Google Scholar 

  9. NBRO. (2018). Sri Lankan government research and development institute web resource http://nbro.gov.lk/index.php?lang=en.

  10. Dept. of Geology | SIU. (2018). Geology.Siu.Edu. https://geology.siu.edu/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIt-bv7sG84wIV1YRwCh2zqQXCEAAYASAAEgIlGPD_BwE.

  11. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. JAIR, 16, 321–357.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chung, C.-J. F. & Fabbri, A. G. (1999). Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ward, T. J., Li, R.-M., & Simons, D. B. Mathematical modeling approach for delineating landslide hazards in watersheds.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hong, Y., Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. (2007). An experimental global prediction system for rainfall-triggered landslides using satellite remote sensing and geospatial datasets. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(6), 1671–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, K., Liu, J., Kuo, C., Wang, H., & Chang, Y. (2017). Combining multi-temporal satellite images and a cloud platform to develop new evaluating procedures for landslide vulnerability study. In 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Fort Worth, TX, pp. 1912–1915.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, A., Zeng, Z., & Fu, C. (2014). Data mining paradigm based on functional networks with applications in landslide prediction. In 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Beijing, pp. 2826–2830.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chaturvedi, P., Srivastava, S., & Tyagi, N. (2015) Prediction of landslide deformation using back-propagation neural network. In IEEE Workshop on Computational Intelligence: Theories, Applications and Future Directions, India.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sa, R., Uzirb, N., Rb, S., & Banerjeeb, S. (2016). Experimenting XGBoost algorithm for prediction and classification of different datasets 9(40).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen T., & Guestrin C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, California, USA, pp. 785–794.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rodrı´guez, J. J.& Kuncheva, L. I. (2006). Rotation forest: A new classifier ensemble method.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, S. F. & Hsiung, P. A (2017). Landslide prediction with model switching. In The 2018 IEEE Conference on Dependable and Secure Computing, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bui, D. T, Tuan, T. A., Klempe, H., Pradhan, B., & Revhaug, I. (2016). Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: A comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 9, 11, 27 January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, W., Xie, X., Wang, J., Pradhan, B., Hong, H., Bui, D.T., et al. (2017). A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. CATENA, 151, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Devi, S. R., Venkatesh, C., Agarwal, P. & Arulmozhivarman, P. (2014). Daily rainfall forecasting using artificial neural networks for early warning of landslides. In 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) (pp. 2218–2224). IEEE, September, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. United States Geological Survey. (2018). A scientific agency of the United States government, web resource https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.

  26. Matsushita, B., Yang, W., Chen, J., Onda, Y. & Qiu, G. (2007). Sensitivity of the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to topographic effects: A case study in high-density cypress forest.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dark Sky. (2018). web resource https://darksky.net/dev.

  28. Bhunia, G. S., Shit, P. K., & Maiti R. (2016). Comparison of GIS-based interpolation methods for spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.02.001

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Director, National Building Research Organization—Sri Lanka (NBRO) for their support for providing required spatial maps for the study area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kusal Hettiarachchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bandara, A., Hettiarachchi, Y., Hettiarachchi, K., Munasinghe, S., Wijesinghe, I., Thayasivam, U. (2020). A Generalized Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling. In: Sharma, N., Chakrabarti, A., Balas, V. (eds) Data Management, Analytics and Innovation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1016. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9364-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9364-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9363-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9364-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics