Abstract
Reduction in NOx and soot emissions from combustion systems has been a major driver for combustion research in recent years. A promising approach for substantially reducing soot in nonpremixed flames is based on simultaneously using an oxygen-enriched oxidizer stream and nitrogen-diluted fuel stream. The effectiveness of this approach is due to the fact that it modifies (increases) the stoichiometric mixture fraction (\( \zeta_{\text{st}} \)) without significantly altering the adiabatic flame temperature. In this chapter, we discuss computational results examining this strategy for small hydrocarbon fuels in flames at atmospheric and high pressures. The computational model employs a reaction mechanism with 197 species and about 5000 reactions for gas-phase chemistry, and a fairly detailed soot model. Results focus on the effect of oxygenation and pressure on the flame structure, soot precursors, and soot emissions. At a given pressure, as \( \zeta_{\text{st}} \) is increased, it leads to a noticeable reduction in acetylene and PAHs formation, and due to increased soot oxidation in the post-flame region, a nearly non-sooting flame can be achieved. Such drastic reduction in PAHs and soot is attributed to both the hydrodynamic effect and the change in flame structure. While the oxygenated combustion in reducing soot is also effective at higher pressures (1–8 atm), the effect of increasing pressure at a fixed \( \zeta_{\text{st}} \) is to increase the PAHs and soot emissions. The presence of double bond (C=C) also leads to higher soot emissions, and consequently, the soot formation is the highest in propene flames and then in ethylene flames followed by propane flames.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Richter H, Howard JB (2000) Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot—a review of chemical reaction pathways. Prog Energy Combust 26:565–608
Wang H (2011) Formation of nascent soot and other condensed-phase materials in flames. Proc Combust Inst 33:41–67
Kennedy IM (2007) The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols. Proc Combust Inst 31(2):2557–2770
Oberdorster G, Sharp Z, Atudorei V, Elder A, Gelein R, Kreyling W, Cox C (2004) Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhal Toxicol 16:437–445
Zheng M, Salmon LG, Schauer JJ, Zeng L, Kiang CS, Zhang Y, Cass GR (2005) Seasonal trends in PM2.5 source contributions in Beijing China. Atmospheric Environment. 39:3967–3976
Hansen J, Nazarenko L (2003) Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101(2):423–428
Hiroyasu H, Kadota T (1976) Models for combustion and formation of nitric oxide and soot in direct injection diesel engines. SAE Paper 1976-760129
Wang Y, Chung SH (2016) Strain rate effect on sooting characteristics in laminar counterflow diffusion flames. Combust Flame 165:433–444
Yu Wang S, Park SM, Sarathy SH Chung (2018) A comparative study on the sooting tendancies of various 1-alkene fuels in counterflow diffusion flames. Combust Flame 192:71–85
Katsuki M, Hasegawa T (1998) The science and technology of combustion in highly preheated air. In: The combustion institute, pp 3135–3146
Gupta AK, Bolz S, Hasegawa T (1999) Effect of air preheat temperature and oxygen concentration on flame structure and emission. J Energy Res Technol 121:209–216
Gupta AK, Hasegawa T, Katsuki K, Kishimoto K, Morita M (2003) High temperature air combustion—from energy conservation to pollution reduction. In: Tsuji H (ed). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Cavaliere A, de Joannon M (2004) Mild combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30:329–366
Kukkadapu G, Kumar K, Sung CJ, Mehl M, Pitz WJ (2015) Autoignition of gasoline surrogates at low temperature combustion conditions. Combust Flame 162(5):2272–2285
Epping K, Aceves S, Bechtold R, Dec JE (2002) The potential of HCCI combustion for high efficiency and low emissions. In: SAE technical paper 2002-01-1923
Chang J, Kalghatgi G, Amer A, Viollet Y (2012) Enabling high efficiency direct injection engine with naphtha fuel through partially premixed charge compression ignition combustion. In: SAE technical paper 2012-01-0677
Akihama K, Takatori Y, Inagaki K, Sasaki S, Dean AM (2001) Mechanism of the smokeless rich diesel combustion by reducing temperature. In: SAE paper 2001-01-0655
Seepana S, Jayanti S (2012) Flame structure investigations of oxy-fuel combustion. Fuel 93:52–58
Desjardins P, Pitsch H, Malhotra R, Kirby SR, Boehman Andre L (2008) Structural group analysis for soot reduction tendency of oxygenated fuels. Combust Flame 154:191–205
Salamanca M, Sirignano M, Commodo M, Minutolo P, D’Anna A (2012) The effect of ethanol on the particle size distributions in ethylene premixed flames. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 43:71–75
Du J, Axelbaum RL (1995) The effect of flame structure on soot-particle inception in diffusion flames. Combust Flame 100:367–375
Kalvakala K, Katta VR, Aggarwal SK (2018) Effects of oxygen-enrichment and fuel unsaturation on soot and NOx emissions in ethylene, propane and propene flames. Combust Flame 187:217–229
Chen R, Axelbaum RL (2005) Scalar dissipation rate at extinction and the effects of oxygen-enriched combustion. Combustion Flame 142(1–2):62–71
Skeen SA, Yablonsky G, Axelbaum RL (2010) Characteristics of non-premixed oxygen-enhanced combustion: II. Flame structure effects on soot precursor kinetics resulting in soot-free flames. Combust Flame 157:1745–1752
Sunderland PB, Axelbaum RL, Urban DL, Chao BH, Liu S (2003) Effects of structure and hydrodynamics on the sooting behavior of spherical microgravity diffusion flames. Combust Flame 132(1–2):25–33
Sugiyama G (1994) Non-luminous diffusion flame of diluted acetylene in oxygen enriched air. Symp (Int) Combust 25:601–608
Lin KC, Faeth GM (1996) Hydrodynamic suppression of soot emissions in laminar diffusion flames. J Propul Power 12(1):10–17
Kalvakala K, Aggarwal SK (2018) PAHs and soot emissions in oxygenated ethylene diffusion flames at elevated pressures. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, turbomachinery technical conference and exposition
Design R (2015) CHEMKIN-PRO 15141, Reaction Design, San Diego
Puri IK, Seshadri K (1986) Extinction of diffusion flames burning diluted methane and diluted propane in diluted air. Combust Flame 65(2):137–150
Han X, Aggarwal SK, Brezinsky K (2013) Effect of unsaturated bond on NOx and PAH formation in n-heptane and 1-heptene triple flames. Energy Fuels 27:537–548
Appel J, Bockhorn H, Frenklach M (2000) Kinetic modeling of soot formation with detailed chemistry and physics: Laminar premixed flames of C2 hydrocarbons. Combust Flame 121:122–136
Colket MB, Hall RJ (1994) Successes and uncertainties in modeling soot formation in laminar, premixed flames, in soot formation in combustion: mechanisms and models. In: Bockhorn H (ed). Springer, New York
Fu X, Han X, Brezinsky K, Aggarwal SK (2013) Effect of fuel molecular structure and premixing on soot emissions from n-heptane and 1-heptene flames. Energy Fuels 27:6262–6272
Law CK (2006) Propagation, structure and limit phenomena of laminar flames at elevated pressures. Combust Sci Technol 178:335–360
Figura L, Gomez A (2014) Structure of incipiently sooting ethylene-nitrogen counterflow diffusion flames at high pressures. Combust Flame 161:1587–1603
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalvakala, K.C., Aggarwal, S.K. (2020). On Soot Reduction Using Oxygenated Combustion in Counterflow Diffusion Flames. In: Gupta, A., De, A., Aggarwal, S., Kushari, A., Runchal, A. (eds) Innovations in Sustainable Energy and Cleaner Environment. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9012-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9012-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9011-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9012-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)