Skip to main content

Hydrodynamic Responses and Loads of a Model Floating Hydrocarbon Storage Tank System for Concept Validation and Numerical Verification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
WCFS2019

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 41))

Abstract

An innovative floating hydrocarbon storage facility (FHSF) has been proposed to utilize the shielded near-shore area for countries with large demand on the land space such as Singapore and Japan. The concept comprises 14 floating hydrocarbon storage tanks (FHST) and several surrounding floating barges. All the modular designed FHSTs are loosely connected to the barges through a soft mooring system so as to reduce the loads, and the entire system is free to float to reduce the tidal influence. The single FSHT has been proven to have moderate hydrodynamic responses in previous studies, but there still exist concerns on the influence of potential resonances in the narrow gaps and the strong hydrodynamic interactions. The loads on the specially designed soft mooring system have to be checked. The complete system is complex and difficult to analyze. So, experimental studies were performed on both a simplified system and the complete system to ensure the quality and reduce the uncertainty in the experiments. The simplified system consists of two FHSTs and a surrounding floating barge frame. The experiments were performed in the ocean basin in SINTEF Ocean. A series of random, wide-band and realistic random wave tests were carried out to generate benchmark data to verify numerical analysis tools. This paper will focus on this simplified system that represents the complete system’s behavior. A frequency domain numerical model of the simplified system was established based on potential theory. Empirical coefficients were used to account for viscous damping. The numerical results are comparable to the experimental results in general. The statistical responses of the FHST in the design sea states are also within the acceptable range even with the hydrodynamic interactions. However, further improvement on the system such as a better design of the floating barge is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wang, C. M., & Tay, Z. Y. (2011). Hydroelastic analysis and response of pontoon-type very large floating structures. In Fluid structure interaction II (pp. 103–130). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miyajima, S., Seto, H., & Ohta, M. (2003). Hydroelastic responses of the Mega-Float Phase-II model in waves. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 13(04).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, C. M., & Wang, B. T. (2015). Large floating structures. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, Z., Gao, Z., & Moan, T. (2018). Hydrodynamic load modeling and analysis of a floating bridge in homogeneous wave conditions. Marine Structures, 59, 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamas-Pardo, M., Iglesias, G., & Carral, L. (2015). A review of Very Large Floating Structures (VLFS) for coastal and offshore uses. Ocean Engineering, 109, 677–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wan, L., Zhang, C., Magee, A. R., Jin, J., Han, M., Ang, K. K., et al. (2018). An innovative mooring system for floating storage tanks and stochastic dynamic response analysis. Ocean Engineering, 170, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, C., Magee, A. R., Wan, L., Wang, C.M., & Hellan, Ø. (2017). Experimental study of hydrodynamic responses of a single floating storage tank with internal fluid. In ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Trondheim, Norway, 25–30 June 2017. OMAE2017-61867.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wan, L., Han, M., Jin, J., Zhang, C., Magee, A. R., Hellan, Ø., et al. (2018). Global dynamic response analysis of oil storage tank in finite water depth: Focusing on fender mooring system parameter design. Ocean Engineering, 148, 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Watanabe, E., Utsunomiya, T., & Wang, C. M. (2004). Hydroelastic analysis of pontoon-type VLFS: A literature survey. Engineering Structures, 26(2), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman, J. N. (1994). Wave effects on deformable bodies. Applied Ocean Research, 16(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding, J., Tian, C., Wu, Y. S., Wang, X. F., Liu, X. L., & Zhang, K. (2019). A simplified method to estimate the hydroelastic responses of VLFS in the inhomogeneous waves. Ocean Engineering, 172, 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman, J. N. (2001). Wave effects on multiple bodies. In M. Kashiwagi (Ed.), Hydrodynamics in ship and ocean engineering (Vol. 3, pp. 3–26), RIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taghipour, R., & Moan, T. (2008). Efficient frequency-domain analysis of dynamic response for the multi-body wave energy converter in multi-directional wave. In The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Vancouver, Canada, 6–11 July 2008. ISOPE-I-08-269.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riggs, H. R., Ertekin, R. C., & Mills, T. R. J. (2000). A comparative study of RMFC and FEA models for the wave-induced response of a MOB. Marine Structures, 13(4–5), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu, S., Moan, T., Chen, X., & Cui, W. (2007). Hydroelastic analysis of flexible floating interconnected structures. Ocean Engineering, 34(11–12), 1516–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, H. C., Xu, D. L., Xia, S. Y., Lu, C., Qi, E. R., Tian, C., et al. (2015). Nonlinear network modeling of multi-module floating structures with arbitrary flexible connections. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 59, 270–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, Q. J., Zhang, H. C., Xu, D. L., Qi, E. R., Tian, C., Ding, J., et al. (2018). Experimental validation of network modeling method on a three-modular floating platform model. Coastal Engineering, 137, 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Faltinsen, O. M., & Timokha, A. N. (2015). On damping of two-dimensional piston-mode sloshing in a rectangular moonpool under forced heave motions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 772.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Molin, B., Zhang, X., Huang, H., & Remy, F. (2018). On natural modes in moonpools and gaps in finite depth. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 840, 530–554.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, W., Pan, Z., Lin, F., Li, B., Taylor, P. H., & Efthymiou, M. (2018). Estimation of gap resonance relevant to side-by-side offloading. Ocean Engineering, 153, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, C., Dai, J., Ang, K. K., & Magee, A. (2018). Comparison study on bottom plate effect on single hydrocarbon storage tank through decay test. In Proceedings of the 1st Vietnam Symposium on Advances in Offshore Engineering (pp. 544–550). Hanoi, Vietnam, 1–3 November 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, C. H., & Newman, J. N. (2013). WAMIT User Manual, version 7.0. Chestnut Hill, MA: WAMIT, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faltinsen, O. (1990). Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported in part by the Singapore Ministry of National Development and the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office under the Land and Liveability National Innovation Challenge (L2 NIC) Research Programme (L2 NIC Award No L2 NICTDF1-2015-2). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of the Singapore Ministry of National Development and National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore. The authors acknowledge WAMIT for providing educational license.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, C., Magee, A.R., Fonseca, N., Hellan, Ø., Ang, K.K. (2020). Hydrodynamic Responses and Loads of a Model Floating Hydrocarbon Storage Tank System for Concept Validation and Numerical Verification. In: Wang, C., Lim, S., Tay, Z. (eds) WCFS2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 41. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8743-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8743-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8742-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8743-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics