Skip to main content

Ethical Principles for the Management of DSD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disorders|Differences of Sex Development

Abstract

The Fifth World Congress on Family Law and Children’s Rights (“Halifax Resolutions” (2009) from http://www.lawrights.asn.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76&Itemid=109) adopted a resolution endorsing a set of ethical guidelines for the management of infants and children with DSD (2009), based on the ethical principles developed by our group. In this chapter, we outline these principles and explain their basis. The principles are intended as an ethical foundation for treatment decisions for DSD, especially regarding type and timing of genital surgery for infants and young children. These principles were formulated by an analytic review of clinicians’ reasoning in particular cases, in relation to established principles of bioethics, in a process consistent with the Rawlsian concept of reflective equilibrium as the method for building ethical theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessiene L, Lombes M, Bouvattier C. Differences of sex development (DSD): controversies and challenges. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2018;79(Suppl 1):S22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan Allen E, Brock DW. Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter M. The human rights of intersex people: addressing harmful practices and rhetoric of change. Reprod Health Matters. 2016;24(47):74–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase C. Surgical progress is not the answer to intersexuality. J Clin Ethics. 1998;9(4):385–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cools M, Drop SL, Wolffenbuttel KP, et al. Germ cell tumors in the intersex gonad: old paths, new directions, moving frontiers. Endocr Rev. 2006;27(5):468–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(2):293–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daaboul J, Frader J. Ethics and the management of the patient with intersex: a middle way. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2001;14(9):1575–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis G. The power in a name: diagnostic terminology and diverse experiences. Psychology & Sexuality. 2013;5(1):15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond M. Intersexuality: recommendations for management. Arch Sex Behav. 1998;27(6):634–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diekema DS. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(4):243–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dresser R. Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3(2):54–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falhammar H, Filipsson H, Holmdahl G, et al. Fractures and bone mineral density in adult women with 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(12):4643–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feder EK, Karkazis K. What’s in a name? The controversy over “disorders of sex development”. Hast Cent Rep. 2008;38(5):33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman RL. Children, families and health care decision-making. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillam L. Fifty years of paediatric ethics. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51(1):8–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillam LH, Hewitt JK, Warne GL. Ethical principles an essential part of process in DSD care. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;76(5):367–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gold H, Hall G, Gillam LH. The role and function of a paediatric clinical ethics service - experiences at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47:632–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gozzi TG, Harris NP, McGown IN, et al. Autopsy diagnosis of 21-hydroxylase deficiency CAH in a case of apparent SIDS. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005;8(3):397–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groveman SA. The Hanukkah bush: ethical implications in the clinical management of intersex. J Clin Ethics. 1998;9(4):356–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halifax Resolutions from http://www.lawrights.asn.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76&Itemid=109 2009.

  • Hester JD. Intersex(es) and informed consent: how physicians’ rhetoric constrains choice. Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(1):21–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, et al. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(7):554–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas M. The baby MB case: medical decision making in the context of uncertain infant suffering. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(9):541–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Karkazis K. Fixing sex. Intersex, medical authority and lived experience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Bahlburg HF. Introduction: gender dysphoria and gender change in persons with intersexuality. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34(4):371–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan ZM, Eugster EA. Upper-tract genitourinary malformations in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Pediatrics. 2007;120(2):e304–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnock R, Crosthwaite J. When parents refuse consent to treatment for children and young persons. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(7):369–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner WG. Special issue. J Clin Ethics. 1998;9(4):337–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross LF. Health care decision making by children - is it in their best interest? Hast Cent Rep. 1997;27(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutzmann K, Brinkmann L, Schacht M, et al. Psychological distress, self-harming behavior, and suicidal tendencies in adults with disorders of sex development. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38(1):16–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer K, Brunner F, Gedrose B, et al. Coping with diverse sex development: treatment experiences and psychosocial support during childhood and adolescence and adult well-being. J Pediatr Psychol. 2017;42(5):504–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spriggs M, Savulescu J. The ethics of surgically assigning sex for intersex children. In: Benatar D, editor. Cutting to the core: exploring the ethics of contested surgeries. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warne G, Bhatia V. Intersex, east and west. In: Sytsma S, editor. Ethics and intersex. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. p. 183–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesemann C, Ude-Koeller S, Sinnecker GH, et al. Ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(6):671–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

With thanks and acknowledgements to the authors who had been involved in the first edition of this chapter: Dr. Jacqueline Hewitt, Professor Garry L. Warne AM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Gillam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gillam, L. (2020). Ethical Principles for the Management of DSD. In: Hutson, J., Grover, S., O'Connell, M., Bouty, A., Hanna, C. (eds) Disorders|Differences of Sex Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7864-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics