Abstract
In earthquakes propagating seismic waves will arrive at adjacent supports at different time instants. Consequently, the ground motion will not excite all bridge components at the same time, but with a time delay. Since the soil development along the bridge is never uniform, the propagating waves will be altered by the different soil properties along the wave path. The bridge will therefore experience spatially non-uniform ground excitation with a coherency loss. The research focuses on the consequence of this non-uniform ground excitation for the response of a bridge structure. The abutment, bridge pier and adjacent abutment were excited by three separate large shake tables, respectively. The influence of the spatial variation of ground motions and the girder-abutment pounding on the seismic response is presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bi KM, Hao H, Chouw N (2013) 3D FEM analysis of pounding response of bridge structures at a canyon site to spatially varying ground motions. Adv Struct Eng 16(4):619–640
Bogdanoff JL, Goldberg JE, Schiff AJ (1965) The effect of ground transmission time on the response of long structures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 55(3):627–640
Bolt BA, Loh CH, Penzien J, Tsai YB, Yeh YT (1982) Preliminary report on the SMART-1 strong motion array in Taiwan. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA
Buckingham E (1914) On physically similar systems: Illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys Rev 4(4):345–376
Chouw N (1995) Effect of the earthquake on 17th of January 1995 on Kobe. In: Proceedings of the D-A-CH meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Society for earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, University of Graz, Austria, pp 135–169
Chouw N, Hao H (2005) Study of SSI and non-uniform ground motion effect on pounding between bridge girders. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:717–728
Chouw N, Hao H (2009) Seismic design of bridge structures with allowance for large relative girder movements to avoid pounding. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 42(2):75–84
Chouw N, Hao H (2008) Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: effect on response with conventional expansion joint. Eng Struct 30:141–153
Chouw N, Hao H (2008) Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response II: effect on response with conventional expansion joint. Eng Struct 30:154–162
Chouw N, Hao H (2012) Pounding damage to buildings and bridges in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Int J Prot Struct 3(2):123–140
Crewe AJ, Norman J (2006) Experimental modelling of multiple support excitation of long span bridges. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on earthquake engineering, Taipei, Taiwan
Goel RK, Chopra AK (2008) Role of shear keys in seismic behavior of bridges crossing fault-rupture zones. J B Eng 13(4):398–408
Guo A, Cui L, Li S, Li H (2015) A phenomenological contact-element model considering slight non-uniform contact for pounding analysis of highway bridges under seismic excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(11):1677–1695
Hao H (1998) A parametric study of the required seating length for bridge decks during earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27(1):91–103
Hao H, Liu XY, Shen J (2000) Pounding response of adjacent buildings subjected to spatial earthquake ground excitations. Adv Struct Eng 3(2):145–162
Hao H, Oliveira C, Penzien J (1989) Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. Nucl Eng Des 111(3):293–310
He LX, Shrestha B, Hao H, Bi KM, Ren WX (2017) Experimental and three-dimensional finite element method studies on pounding responses of bridge structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Adv Struct Eng 20(1):105–124
Hsu YT, Fu CC (2004) Seismic effect on highway bridges in Chi Chi earthquake. J Perform Constr Facil 18(1):47–53
Johnson NE, Galletly R (1972) The comparison of the response of a highway bridge to uniform ground shock and moving ground excitation. Shock Vib Bull 42:75–85
Kawashima K, Unjoh S, Hoshikuma JI, Kosa K (2011) Damage of bridges due to the 2010 Maule, Chile, earthquake. J Earthq Eng 15(7):1036–1068
Kun C, Jiang LZ, Chouw N (2017) Influence of pounding and skew angle on seismic response of bridges. Eng Struct 148:890–906
Kun C, Yang ZQ, Chouw N (2018) Seismic response of skewed bridges including pounding effects. Earthq Struct 14(5):467–476
Li B, Bi K, Chouw N, Butterworth JW, Hao H (2013) Effect of abutment excitation on bridge pounding. Eng Struct 54:57–68
Li B, Chouw N (2014) Experimental investigation of inelastic bridge response under spatially varying excitations with pounding. Eng Struct 79:106–116
Li B, Chouw N (2016) Field tests on total gap of modular expansion joints to avoid bridge pounding. Front Built Environ 2:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2016.00007
Lin CJ, Hung H, Liu Y, Chai J (2008) Reconnaissance report of 0512 China Wenchuan earthquake on bridges. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing: 13
Makris N (2014) The role of the rotational inertia on the seismic resistance of freestanding rocking columns and articulated frames. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(5):2226–2239
New Zealand Standards NZS1170.5, Earthquake Actions (2004)
Qin X, Chen Y, Chouw N (2013) Effect of uplift and soil nonlinearity on plastic hinge development and induced vibrations in structures. Adv Struct Eng 16(1):135–147
Sextos AG, Kappos AJ, Pitilakis KD (2003) Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil–structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: parametric study, earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, vol 32, no 4, pp 629–652
Werner SD, Lee LC, Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1977) An evaluation of the effects of traveling seismic waves on the three-dimensional response of structures. Agbabian Associates, National Science Foundation. AA-R-7720-4514
Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C (2002) Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(6):1325–1345
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment for the support of this research through the Natural Hazards Research Platform under the Award 3708936. The authors also would like to extend their gratitude to China Scholarship Council for supporting the doctoral research of the first author at the University of Auckland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yang, Z., Kun, C., Chouw, N. (2020). Impact of Spatial Variation of Ground Motions on the Seismic Performance of a Bridge Structure. In: Wang, C., Ho, J., Kitipornchai, S. (eds) ACMSM25. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 37. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_95
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_95
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7602-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7603-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)