Skip to main content

Impact of Spatial Variation of Ground Motions on the Seismic Performance of a Bridge Structure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ACMSM25

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 37))

  • 2661 Accesses

Abstract

In earthquakes propagating seismic waves will arrive at adjacent supports at different time instants. Consequently, the ground motion will not excite all bridge components at the same time, but with a time delay. Since the soil development along the bridge is never uniform, the propagating waves will be altered by the different soil properties along the wave path. The bridge will therefore experience spatially non-uniform ground excitation with a coherency loss. The research focuses on the consequence of this non-uniform ground excitation for the response of a bridge structure. The abutment, bridge pier and adjacent abutment were excited by three separate large shake tables, respectively. The influence of the spatial variation of ground motions and the girder-abutment pounding on the seismic response is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bi KM, Hao H, Chouw N (2013) 3D FEM analysis of pounding response of bridge structures at a canyon site to spatially varying ground motions. Adv Struct Eng 16(4):619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bogdanoff JL, Goldberg JE, Schiff AJ (1965) The effect of ground transmission time on the response of long structures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 55(3):627–640

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolt BA, Loh CH, Penzien J, Tsai YB, Yeh YT (1982) Preliminary report on the SMART-1 strong motion array in Taiwan. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buckingham E (1914) On physically similar systems: Illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys Rev 4(4):345–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chouw N (1995) Effect of the earthquake on 17th of January 1995 on Kobe. In: Proceedings of the D-A-CH meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Society for earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, University of Graz, Austria, pp 135–169

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chouw N, Hao H (2005) Study of SSI and non-uniform ground motion effect on pounding between bridge girders. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chouw N, Hao H (2009) Seismic design of bridge structures with allowance for large relative girder movements to avoid pounding. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 42(2):75–84

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chouw N, Hao H (2008) Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: effect on response with conventional expansion joint. Eng Struct 30:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chouw N, Hao H (2008) Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response II: effect on response with conventional expansion joint. Eng Struct 30:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chouw N, Hao H (2012) Pounding damage to buildings and bridges in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Int J Prot Struct 3(2):123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crewe AJ, Norman J (2006) Experimental modelling of multiple support excitation of long span bridges. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on earthquake engineering, Taipei, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goel RK, Chopra AK (2008) Role of shear keys in seismic behavior of bridges crossing fault-rupture zones. J B Eng 13(4):398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo A, Cui L, Li S, Li H (2015) A phenomenological contact-element model considering slight non-uniform contact for pounding analysis of highway bridges under seismic excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(11):1677–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hao H (1998) A parametric study of the required seating length for bridge decks during earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27(1):91–103

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hao H, Liu XY, Shen J (2000) Pounding response of adjacent buildings subjected to spatial earthquake ground excitations. Adv Struct Eng 3(2):145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hao H, Oliveira C, Penzien J (1989) Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. Nucl Eng Des 111(3):293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He LX, Shrestha B, Hao H, Bi KM, Ren WX (2017) Experimental and three-dimensional finite element method studies on pounding responses of bridge structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Adv Struct Eng 20(1):105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu YT, Fu CC (2004) Seismic effect on highway bridges in Chi Chi earthquake. J Perform Constr Facil 18(1):47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson NE, Galletly R (1972) The comparison of the response of a highway bridge to uniform ground shock and moving ground excitation. Shock Vib Bull 42:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kawashima K, Unjoh S, Hoshikuma JI, Kosa K (2011) Damage of bridges due to the 2010 Maule, Chile, earthquake. J Earthq Eng 15(7):1036–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kun C, Jiang LZ, Chouw N (2017) Influence of pounding and skew angle on seismic response of bridges. Eng Struct 148:890–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kun C, Yang ZQ, Chouw N (2018) Seismic response of skewed bridges including pounding effects. Earthq Struct 14(5):467–476

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li B, Bi K, Chouw N, Butterworth JW, Hao H (2013) Effect of abutment excitation on bridge pounding. Eng Struct 54:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li B, Chouw N (2014) Experimental investigation of inelastic bridge response under spatially varying excitations with pounding. Eng Struct 79:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li B, Chouw N (2016) Field tests on total gap of modular expansion joints to avoid bridge pounding. Front Built Environ 2:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2016.00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin CJ, Hung H, Liu Y, Chai J (2008) Reconnaissance report of 0512 China Wenchuan earthquake on bridges. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing: 13

    Google Scholar 

  27. Makris N (2014) The role of the rotational inertia on the seismic resistance of freestanding rocking columns and articulated frames. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(5):2226–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. New Zealand Standards NZS1170.5, Earthquake Actions (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qin X, Chen Y, Chouw N (2013) Effect of uplift and soil nonlinearity on plastic hinge development and induced vibrations in structures. Adv Struct Eng 16(1):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sextos AG, Kappos AJ, Pitilakis KD (2003) Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil–structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: parametric study, earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, vol 32, no 4, pp 629–652

    Google Scholar 

  31. Werner SD, Lee LC, Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1977) An evaluation of the effects of traveling seismic waves on the three-dimensional response of structures. Agbabian Associates, National Science Foundation. AA-R-7720-4514

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C (2002) Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(6):1325–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment for the support of this research through the Natural Hazards Research Platform under the Award 3708936. The authors also would like to extend their gratitude to China Scholarship Council for supporting the doctoral research of the first author at the University of Auckland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Chouw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yang, Z., Kun, C., Chouw, N. (2020). Impact of Spatial Variation of Ground Motions on the Seismic Performance of a Bridge Structure. In: Wang, C., Ho, J., Kitipornchai, S. (eds) ACMSM25. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 37. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_95

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7602-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7603-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics