Abstract
At the physical layer, Underwater Acoustic Communication (UWAC) channels present many challenges for efficient communications, which feature both long delay spreads and serious Doppler effects. The waves and motions at the surface of the sea are the main causes for these effects. The complexity at the receiver increases along with the symbol rate, thereby increasing the burden of the channel. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) which is a form of multicarrier modulation has been effectively used for UWAC recently because of its ability to handle long dispersive channels reducing the complexity of the channel equalization. However, Inter Carrier Interference (ICI) is introduced by the Doppler effects that destroy the orthogonality of the subcarriers. To overcome the effects of OFDM, an emerging technique known as Filter Bank Multicarrier Communication system (FBMC) is used in UWAC. The high capacity of the transmission bandwidth in FBMC systems can be accomplished by applying Offset Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (OQAM). Because of cyclic prefix deletion, FBMC/OQAM can arrange higher spectral efficiency when compared to OFDM. This paper worked on both OFDM and FBMC/OQAM by considering the losses and noise effects in UWAC environment and explained their performances with respect to Bit Error Rate (BER).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sharma SK, Sharma U (2017) UWA communication using MIMO OFDM. Int J Eng Manag Res (IJEMR) 7(3):346–452
Pranitha B, Anjaneyulu L (2016) Review of research trends in underwater communications—A technical survey. In: 2016 international conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP), pp 1443–1447, April 2016
Zhang L, Xu X, Feng W, Chen Y (2016) Multi-array iterative receiver for underwater acoustic OFDM communications with EXIT chart evaluation. Appl Acoust 114:307–316
Stojanovic M (1999) Underwater acoustic communication. In: Wiley encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering, pp 1–12
Le Floch B, Alard M, Berrou C (1995) Coded orthogonal frequency division multiplex. Proc IEEE 83:982
Chithra K, Sireesha N, Thangavel C, Gowthaman V, Narayanan SS, Sudhakar T, Atmanand MA (2015) Underwater Communication implementation with OFDM. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 44(2): 259–266, Feb 2015
Tensubam BD, Chanu NL, Singh S (2014) Comparative analysis of FBMC and OFDM multicarrier techniques for wireless communication networks. Int J Comput Appl 100(19)
Amini P, Chen RR, Farhang-Boroujeny B (2015) Filterbank multicarrier communications for underwater acoustic channels. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 40(1):115–130
Esmaiel H, Jiang D (2013) Multicarrier communication for underwater acoustic channel. Int J Commun Netw Syst Sci 6:361–376
Khrouf W, Siala M, Abdelkefi F (2018) How much FBMC/OQAM is better than FBMC/QAM? A tentative response using the POPS paradigm. Wirel Commun Mob Comput
Stojanovic M (2008) OFDM for underwater acoustic communications: adaptive synchronization and sparse channel estimation. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, ICASSP 2008, pp 5288–5291, Mar 2008
Khan AIR, Gang Q, Mehboob K (2013) Investigation of channel modeling and simulation of OFDM based communication near northern regions of arabian sea. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 5(4):1169–1182
Bhardwaj M, Gangwar A, Soni D (2012) A review on OFDM: concept, scope & its applications. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng (IOSRJMCE) 1(1):07–11
Kansal P, Shankhwar AK (2017) FBMC vs OFDM waveform contenders for 5G wireless communication system. Wirel Eng Technol 8(04):59
Moles-Cases V, Zaidi AA, Chen X, Oechtering TJ, Baldemair R (2017) A comparison of OFDM, QAM-FBMC, and OQAM-FBMC waveforms subject to phase noise. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6. IEEE, May 2017
Tensubam BD, Singh S (2014) A review on FBMC: an efficient multicarrier modulation system. Int J Comput Appl (0975–8887), pp 17273
He X, Zhao Z, Zhang H (2012) A pilot-aided channel estimation method for FBMC/OQAM communications system. In: 2012 international symposium on communications and information technologies (ISCIT), pp 175–180. IEEE, Oct 2012
Stojanovic M, Preisig J (2009) Underwater acoustic communication channels: propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun Mag 47(1):84–89
Joshy S, Babu A (2010) Capacity of underwater wireless communication channel with different acoustic propagation loss models. Int J Comput Networks Commun (IJCNC) 2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pranitha, B., Anjaneyulu, L. (2019). Assessment of UWAC System Performance Using FBMC Technique. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Pal, S., Pan, I., Das, A. (eds) Recent Trends in Signal and Image Processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 922. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6783-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6783-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6782-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6783-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)