Skip to main content

Assessment of UWAC System Performance Using FBMC Technique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends in Signal and Image Processing

Abstract

At the physical layer, Underwater Acoustic Communication (UWAC) channels present many challenges for efficient communications, which feature both long delay spreads and serious Doppler effects. The waves and motions at the surface of the sea are the main causes for these effects. The complexity at the receiver increases along with the symbol rate, thereby increasing the burden of the channel. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) which is a form of multicarrier modulation has been effectively used for UWAC recently because of its ability to handle long dispersive channels reducing the complexity of the channel equalization. However, Inter Carrier Interference (ICI) is introduced by the Doppler effects that destroy the orthogonality of the subcarriers. To overcome the effects of OFDM, an emerging technique known as Filter Bank Multicarrier Communication system (FBMC) is used in UWAC. The high capacity of the transmission bandwidth in FBMC systems can be accomplished by applying Offset Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (OQAM). Because of cyclic prefix deletion, FBMC/OQAM can arrange higher spectral efficiency when compared to OFDM. This paper worked on both OFDM and FBMC/OQAM by considering the losses and noise effects in UWAC environment and explained their performances with respect to Bit Error Rate (BER).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sharma SK, Sharma U (2017) UWA communication using MIMO OFDM. Int J Eng Manag Res (IJEMR) 7(3):346–452

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pranitha B, Anjaneyulu L (2016) Review of research trends in underwater communications—A technical survey. In: 2016 international conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP), pp 1443–1447, April 2016

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang L, Xu X, Feng W, Chen Y (2016) Multi-array iterative receiver for underwater acoustic OFDM communications with EXIT chart evaluation. Appl Acoust 114:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stojanovic M (1999) Underwater acoustic communication. In: Wiley encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Le Floch B, Alard M, Berrou C (1995) Coded orthogonal frequency division multiplex. Proc IEEE 83:982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chithra K, Sireesha N, Thangavel C, Gowthaman V, Narayanan SS, Sudhakar T, Atmanand MA (2015) Underwater Communication implementation with OFDM. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 44(2): 259–266, Feb 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tensubam BD, Chanu NL, Singh S (2014) Comparative analysis of FBMC and OFDM multicarrier techniques for wireless communication networks. Int J Comput Appl 100(19)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amini P, Chen RR, Farhang-Boroujeny B (2015) Filterbank multicarrier communications for underwater acoustic channels. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 40(1):115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Esmaiel H, Jiang D (2013) Multicarrier communication for underwater acoustic channel. Int J Commun Netw Syst Sci 6:361–376

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khrouf W, Siala M, Abdelkefi F (2018) How much FBMC/OQAM is better than FBMC/QAM? A tentative response using the POPS paradigm. Wirel Commun Mob Comput

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stojanovic M (2008) OFDM for underwater acoustic communications: adaptive synchronization and sparse channel estimation. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, ICASSP 2008, pp 5288–5291, Mar 2008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khan AIR, Gang Q, Mehboob K (2013) Investigation of channel modeling and simulation of OFDM based communication near northern regions of arabian sea. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 5(4):1169–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhardwaj M, Gangwar A, Soni D (2012) A review on OFDM: concept, scope & its applications. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng (IOSRJMCE) 1(1):07–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kansal P, Shankhwar AK (2017) FBMC vs OFDM waveform contenders for 5G wireless communication system. Wirel Eng Technol 8(04):59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moles-Cases V, Zaidi AA, Chen X, Oechtering TJ, Baldemair R (2017) A comparison of OFDM, QAM-FBMC, and OQAM-FBMC waveforms subject to phase noise. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6. IEEE, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tensubam BD, Singh S (2014) A review on FBMC: an efficient multicarrier modulation system. Int J Comput Appl (0975–8887), pp 17273

    Google Scholar 

  17. He X, Zhao Z, Zhang H (2012) A pilot-aided channel estimation method for FBMC/OQAM communications system. In: 2012 international symposium on communications and information technologies (ISCIT), pp 175–180. IEEE, Oct 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stojanovic M, Preisig J (2009) Underwater acoustic communication channels: propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun Mag 47(1):84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Joshy S, Babu A (2010) Capacity of underwater wireless communication channel with different acoustic propagation loss models. Int J Comput Networks Commun (IJCNC) 2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Pranitha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pranitha, B., Anjaneyulu, L. (2019). Assessment of UWAC System Performance Using FBMC Technique. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Pal, S., Pan, I., Das, A. (eds) Recent Trends in Signal and Image Processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 922. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6783-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6783-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6782-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6783-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics