Skip to main content

Legitimizing Precarity: Zero Hours Contracts in the United Kingdom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zero Hours and On-call Work in Anglo-Saxon Countries

Part of the book series: Work, Organization, and Employment ((WOAE))

Abstract

Zero hours contracts continue to be one of the most controversial topics in the UK labour market. In this chapter, we describe the ongoing growth in zero hours work and subject legal and political narratives surrounding their role in the labour market and implications for individual workers to critical scrutiny. Following a definitional overview, we first set out the most recent empirical evidence on the extent and characteristics of zero hours work. We then turn to the regulatory context, with a particular emphasis on the interaction of tax law and social security provisions with key employment law norms, including both status questions (with particular emphasis on the doctrine of mutuality of obligations) and substantive rights (including the minimum wage and working time protection). We conclude with a discussion of competing explanations and policy positions in recent public debates and offer our own analysis of the problematic implications of a multi-tier workforce in the UK labour market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note also the recent Court of Appeal decision: Aslam v Uber BV, [2018] EWCA Civ 2748.

  2. 2.

    HL Deb 23 March 1998 vol 587 cc1026-84, 1049 per Baroness Turner of Camden.

  3. 3.

    HC Deb 21 May 1998 vol 312 cc1103-17, 1104, per Mrs Beckett.

  4. 4.

    HC Deb 21 May 1998 vol 312 cc1103-17, 1104, per Mrs Beckett.

  5. 5.

    HC Deb 31 March 1999 vol 328 cc1110-53, 1130, per Mr Bruce.

  6. 6.

    HC Deb 18 March 1996 vol 274 c32 W, per Mr Forth.

  7. 7.

    This total excludes contracts that do not guarantee a minimum number of hours where work was not carried out in the reference period, and so does not count workers engaged on zero hours contracting arrangements who did not work or who were unable to work, in the 2-week period.

  8. 8.

    Women are more likely to be working under zero hours arrangements, but this is largely because the industries and occupations that women work in are more likely to use zero hours contracts. Controlling for industry and occupation results in the relationship between women and zero hours arrangements becoming insignificant.

  9. 9.

    55 Third Report of Session 2016–17, HC 219, 7.

  10. 10.

    Analysis of the LFS shows that 12% of ZHC workers claimed tax credits compared to 7.9% of workers on other contracts.

  11. 11.

    Workers are there defined as those working (a) under a contract of employment or (b) any other contract […] whereby the individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services for another party to the contract […].

  12. 12.

    Byrne [17].

  13. 13.

    Including notably the Working Time Regulations 1998 (n 110) and the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. This position has been thrown in doubt by some of the most recent cases in this area, as discussed extensively in (Prassl 2017).

  14. 14.

    Such as for example the annual leave rights in the Working Time Directive: C Barnard, ‘The Working Time Regulations 1998’ (1999) 28 ILJ 61, 62. Though cf now Case C-173/99 R v Department of Trade and Industry (ex parte BECTU) [2001] 3 CML Rev 7.

  15. 15.

    Section 3 National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999.

  16. 16.

    Regulation 34 expressly excludes time travelling between home and workplace. This has harsh implications in certain industries, as can be seen in: Aslam v Uber BV, [2017] IRLR. 4. See also: Thera East v Mr J Valentine Appeal No. UKEAT/0325/16/DM where the court left it to the contract to decide if travel time was ‘work’ that earned a right to be paid. On overnight layovers. See: Baxter v Titan Aviation Ltd (unreported) 30 August 2011 (EAT).

  17. 17.

    Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015, Section 153 (the relevant provisions have now become Section 27A(3) of the ERA 1996).

  18. 18.

    Result of the Private Members' Bill ballot: Session 2014–15.

  19. 19.

    Most recently, see the Government’s ‘Good Work Plan’ and associated reforms, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/766167/goodwork-plan-command-paper.pdf.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremias Prassl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adams, A., Adams, Z., Prassl, J. (2019). Legitimizing Precarity: Zero Hours Contracts in the United Kingdom. In: O’Sullivan, M., et al. Zero Hours and On-call Work in Anglo-Saxon Countries. Work, Organization, and Employment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6613-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics