Skip to main content

Abstract

The main focus of this chapter is the presentation and discussion of land use expansion based on the two latest mappings of land use in the Brazilian Cerrado (2002 and 2013); both maps were produced by interpreting Landsat satellite images. The results show a 3% increase in land occupation in the Cerrado between 2002 and 2013, which is much higher than the 1.23% increase seen in the Legal Amazônia. The area and spatial distribution of different types of land use in 2013 are shown below. A comparison of the 2002 and 2013 results is then shown. Here the emphasis is placed on the new agricultural frontier located in the northern part of the Cerrado, known as MATOPIBA , an abbreviation made up of the first two letters of the names of the states of Maranhão, Tocantins , Piauí, and Bahia. The final section considers the potential for a crop-livestock-forest integration system in the Cerrado. The chapter concludes with a discussion on one of the most important challenges facing environmentally sustainable agriculture in the Cerrado in the near future, namely precision agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The shapefile provided by the IBGE results in different areas of the Cerrado depending on the projection system (for example, 204.7 Mha for the UTM projection system and the SAD69 datum). The value of 203.9 Mha was obtained by using the South America Albers Equal Area Conic projection system and the SIRGAS2000 datum.

  2. 2.

    The minimum size of the polygons set by the 2002 land use and land cover mapping was 40 ha while that for the 2013 land use and land cover mapping was 6.25 ha. Therefore, a significant number of mining activities would have been unidentified in the 2002 map. Although there is no study evaluating the average size of deforestation related to mining activities, they are typically smaller than 40 ha.

  3. 3.

    Fiscal modules correspond to the minimum area (in ha) required to make a rural property economically viable. The minimum area is set differently for each municipality, taking into account local conditions, such as the dominant type of farming in the municipality (for example, annual crops, permanent crops, livestock, or reforestation ) and the income from the predominant form of exploitation, among other conditions.

  4. 4.

    Areas located within a rural property which must be maintained with its native vegetation (forest or non-forest). These areas are considered necessary for the sustainable use of natural resources, biodiversity conservation, the protection of wildlife and flora, as well as rehabilitation of ecological processes.

References

  • Agrosatélite. 2015. Análise geoespacial da dinâmica das culturas anuais no bioma Cerrado: 2000 a 2014. Florianópolis: Agrosatélite.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amado, Telmo Jorge Carneiro, Luciano Zucuni Paes, Cláudio Luiz Lemainski, and Ricardo Bergamo Schenato. 2009. “Atributos químicos e físicos de Latossolos e sua relação com os rendimentos de milho e feijão irrigados.” Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 33 (4): 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastos Filho, Guilherme, Douglas Nakazone Guilherme, Giseli Bruggemann, and Heloisa Melo. 2007. “Rally da safra 2007: uma avaliação do plantio direto no Brasil.” Revista Plantio Direto 101: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Ciniro, Paulo Roberto Lima de Meirelles, Janaína Januário da Silva, and Marco Aurélio Factori. 2008. “Evolução das pastagens cultivadas e do efetivo bovino no Brasil.” Veterinária e Zootecnica 15 (1): 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquerdo, Júlio César Dalla Mora, Alexandre Camargo Coutinho, Lídia Bertolo Sanches, Bruno Milliet de Oliveira Ribeiro, Nádia Zacharczuk Zakharov, Talita Nogueira Terra, and Victor Danilo Manabe. 2015. “Dinâmica da agricultura anual na região do Matopiba.” In XVII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, São José dos Campos, INPE, 4583–4588. São José dos Campos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, Laerte G., Edson E. Sano, Luis E. Fernandez, and Fernando M. Araújo. 2013. “Biophysical Characteristics and Fire Occurrence of Cultivated Pastures in the Brazilian Savanna Observed by Moderate Resolution Satellite Data.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 34: 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FUNCATE. 2010. Emissões de gases de efeito estufa no setor uso da terra, mudança do uso da terra e florestas. Segundo Inventário Brasileiro de Emissões Antrópicas de Gases de Efeito Estufa. São José dos Campos: INPE, Relatórios de Referência: 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globo Rural. 2016. Reviravolta no Cerrado. April 2016 issue. São Paulo, April 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, João Paulo Domingos. 2012. “Análise da ocupação do Cerrado pelo agronegócio no sul do Maranhão e Piauí usando imagens Landsat do período 1975–2010.” Master diss., São José dos Campos: INPE, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBAMA. 2016. Projeto de Monitoramento do Desmatamento dos Biomas Brasileiros por Satélite (PMDBBS). Cerrado. Brasília: IBAMA. http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/monitora_biomas/PMDBBS%20-20CERRADO.html.

  • IBGE. 2004. Mapa de biomas e de vegetação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/21052004biomashtml.shtm.

  • IBGE. 2006. Censo Agropecuário. Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 777.

    Google Scholar 

  • INPE. 2016. Projeto TerraClass Cerrado. Mapeamento de uso e cobertura vegetal do Cerrado. São José dos Campos: INPE. http://www.dpi.inpe.br/tccerrado/.

  • MCT. 2004. Comunicação nacional inicial do Brasil à convenção-quadro das Nações Unidas sobre mudança do clima. Brasília: MCT. http://www.mct.gov.br/upd_blob/0205/205854.pdf.

  • Miranda, Evaristo Eduardo, Lucíola Alves Magalhães, and Carlos Alberto de Carvalho. 2014. Proposta de delimitação territorial do MATOPIBA. Campinas: Embrapa/GITE: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montezano, Zaqueu Fernando, Edemar Joaquim Corazza, and Takashi Muraoka. 2006. “Variabilidade espacial da fertilidade do solo em área cultivada e manejada homogeneamente.” Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 30 (5): 839–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resende, Álvaro V, Luciano S. Shiratsuchi, Mariana C. Sena, Luise L. Krahl, João V. F. Oliveira, Ronan F. Corrêa, and Tiago Oro. 2006. “Grades amostrais para fins de mapeamento da fertilidade do solo em área de Cerrado.” In II Congresso Brasileiro de Agricultura de Precisão, 1. Piracicaba: ESALQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resende, Álvaro Vilela, Luciano S. Shiratsuchi, Antônio M. Coelho, Edemar J. Corazza, Marina F. Vilela, Ricardo Y. Inamasu, Alberto C.C. Bernardi, Luis H. Bassoi, and João M. Naime. 2010. “Agricultura de precisão no Brasil: avanços, dificuldades e impactos no manejo e conservação do solo, segurança alimentar e sustentabilidade.” In XVIII Reunião Brasileira de Manejo e Conservação do Solo e Água. Teresina: Embrapa Meio Norte: 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, José Felipe, and Bruno Machado Teles Walter. 2008. “As principais fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado.” In Cerrado. Ecologia e flora. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, ed. Sueli Matiko Sano, Semiramis Pedrosa de Almeida, and José Felipe Ribeiro, 151–212. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados v. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano, Sueli Matiko, Semiramis Pedrosa de Almeida, and José Felipe Ribeiro. 2008. Cerrado. Ecologia e Flora. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados v. 2: 1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano, Edson Eyji, Roberto Rosa, Jorge Luis Silva Brito, and Laerte Guimarães Ferreira. 2010. “Land Cover Mapping of the Tropical Savanna Region in Brazil”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 166: 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sano, Edson Eyji. 2016. “Environment-Friendly Land Use of Cerrado.” In Development for Sustainable Agriculture. The Brazilian Cerrado, edited by Akio Hosono, Carlos Magno Campos da Rocha, and Yutaka Hongo, 197–208. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2010. Brazilian Agriculture. The Miracle of the Cerrado. 26 August 2010. http://www.economist.com/node/16886442.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edson Eyji Sano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 JICA Research Institute

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sano, E.E. (2019). Land Use Expansion in the Brazilian Cerrado. In: Hosono, A., Hamaguchi, N., Bojanic, A. (eds) Innovation with Spatial Impact: Sustainable Development of the Brazilian Cerrado. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6182-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics