Abstract
One key to effective leadership is possessing positive leader identity that is derived from acquiring a leadership position and being accepted by others. We conducted a research to further the understanding about identity construction. Based on the social identity perspective, we assume that leader group prototypicality, leadership self-efficacy, leader endorsement, and leader group-oriented behavior are likely to form a positive leader identity. To minimize common method bias, we collected data from two different sources (leaders and followers), and analyzed 80 pairs of leaders and followers using multiple moderated regression. Analysis shows: (1) positive leader identity is influenced by leadership self-efficacy and leader group prototypicality; and (2) leader group-oriented behavior powerfully moderates the relationship between leader group prototypicality and positive leader identity. These findings indicate that leaders are able to construct a positive identity even when their characteristics are not group prototypical, as long as they are perceived to be group oriented. Our results suggest a promising future for non-prototypical leaders, and explain how they are able to construct a positive leader identity. Further, although previous research has supported the role of leader endorsement on positive leader identity, our data set does not. We discuss the contribution of this research and related managerial implications, especially in a high power distance country like Indonesia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almendral, A. (2016, October 13). Rodrigo Duterte, scorned abroad, remains popular in the Philippines. The New York Times. Retrieved July 5, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/world/asia/philippines-rodrigo-duterte-rating.html.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80.
Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. The American Psychologist, 65, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018806.
Bass, B., & Bass, R. (2008). The boss handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.
Birkinshaw, J., de diego, E., & Lianghong ke, D. (2018). Seven lessons from Tencent’s Pony Ma. London Business School Review, 29(2), 50–53.
Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Claiming authority: Negotiating challenges for women leaders. In D. M. Messick & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of leadership: New perspective and research (p. 191). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brodbeck, F. C., Frese, M., Akerblom, S., Audia, G., Bakacsi, G., et al. (2000). Cultural variation of leadership prototypes across 22 European countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900166859.
Chan, K., & Drasgow, F. (2004). Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.481.
Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., & Fang, W. (2009). Supervisor–subordinate guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5, 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00153.x.
Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1999). The model of followers’ responses to self-sacrificial leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00025-9.
Cicero, L., Pierro, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). Leadership and uncertainty: How role ambiguity affects the relationship between leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. British Journal of Management, 21, 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00648.x.
Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6.
Day, D. V., & Harrison, M. M. (2007). A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.007.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01.
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.53503267.
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 374–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814002.
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.48463334.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814002.
Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2017). Leadership and followership identity process: A multilevel review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.003.
Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245.
Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.012.
Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W., & Sleebos, E. (2013). Team-oriented leadership: The interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032445.
Gosling, J., & Mintzberg, M. (2003, November 1–9). The five minds of a manager. Harvard Business Review.
Graf, M. M., Schuh, S. C., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Van Dick, R. (2011). The relationship between leaders’ group-oriented values and follower identification and endorsement of leaders: The moderating role of leaders’ group membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0997-4.
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Grillel, A., Schutel, E. A., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Promoting shared leadership: A multilevel analysis investigating the role of prototypical team leader behavior, psychological empowerment, and fair rewards. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 22(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815570039.
Guillen, L., Mayo, M., & Korotov, K. (2015). Is leadership a part of me? A leader identity approach to understanding the motivation to lead. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 802–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.001.
Guo, X. (2016). Leader group prototypicality and employee well-being: The mediate effect of group commitment and the moderate effect of openness. Psychology, 7(4), 591–597. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.74061.
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., & Harms, P. D. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 669–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.007.
Harvard business review manager’s handbook: The 17 skills leaders need to stand out. (2017). Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382.
Hirsh, J. B., & Kang, S. K. (2015). Mechanisms of identity conflict: Uncertainty, anxiety, and the behavioral inhibition system. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315589475.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, J. G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations, software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_1.
Julian, J. W., Hollander, E. P., & Regula, C. R. (1969). Endorsement of the group spokesman as a function of his source of authority, competence, and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(1), 42–49.
Karelaia, N., & Guillen, L. (2014). Me, a woman and a leader: Positive social identity and identity conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.08.002.
Kezar, A. J., & Holcombe, E. M. (2017). Shared leadership in higher education: Important lessons from research and practice. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557.
Lemoine, G. J., Aggarwal, I., & Steed, L. B. (2016). When women emerge as leaders: Effects of extraversion and gender composition in groups. Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.008.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202.
Marchiondo, L. A., Myers, C. G., & Kopelman, S. (2015). The relational nature of leadership identity construction: How and when it influences perceived leadership and decision-making. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 892–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.006.
McKenzie, S., & Liptak, K. (2016, September 6). After cursing Obama, Duterte expresses regret. CNN Politics. Retrieved July 5, 2017, from http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/05/politics/philippines-president-rodrigo-duterte-barack-obama/.
Michener, H. A., & Lawler, E. J. (1975). Endorsement of formal leaders: An integrative model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 216–223.
Murphy, S. E. (2001). Leader self-regulation: The role of self-efficacy and multiple intelligence. In R. E. Riggio & S. E. Murphy (Eds.), Multiple intelligences and leadership (pp. 163–186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Paglis, L. L., & Green, S. G. (2002). Leadership self-efficacy and managers’ motivation for leading change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.137.
Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1129–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036751.supp.
Peus, C., Braun, S., & Knipfer, K. (2015). On becoming a leader in Asia and America: Empirical evidence from women managers. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.004.
Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.002.
Platow, M. J., Reid, S., & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298011004.
Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711011.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
Quaquebeke, N. V., Knippenberg, D. V., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.011.
Riantoputra, C. D., Bastaman, A., & Duarsa, H. C. (2017). Positive identity as a leader in Indonesia: It is your trait that count, not your gender. In A. A. Ariyanto, H. Muluk, P. Newcombe, F. P. Piercy, E. K. Poerwandari, & S. H. R. Suradijono (Eds.), Diversity in unity: Perspectives from psychology and behavioral science. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Riantoputra, C. D., & Gatari, E. (2017). Women leaders in Indonesia: Current pictures and strategies for improvement. In Y. Cho, R. Gosh, J. Sun, & G. Clean (Eds.), Current perspectives on Asian women in leadership: A cross cultural analysis (pp. 55–70). Palgrave Macmilan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54996-5.
Risk Taker. (2011). [video] Directed by O. Jacoby. US: Storryvile Film.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Sart, G. (2014). The new leadership model of university management for innovation and entrepreneurship. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 57, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.57.6.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2003). A sociological approach to self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 128–152). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018938.
van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004.
van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004.
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25006-1.
van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25.
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002.
Van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (2002). Leader endorsement in social dilemmas: Comparing the instrumental and relational perspectives. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000055.
Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods, and applications. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riyadi, N., Asakarunia, D.A., Wijaya, F., Riantoputra, C.D. (2019). The Construction of Positive Leader Identity: Acquiring a Leadership Position and Being Accepted by Others. In: Sendjaya, S. (eds) Leading for High Performance in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6074-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6074-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6073-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6074-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)