Skip to main content

Productivism, Financialisation, and the “Good Farmer”: Constructing a Rational, Governable Farming Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making Markets in Australian Agriculture
  • 335 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the concept of productivity in the context of structural adjustment policies implemented by the Australian Government in recent decades. I suggest this focus reduces the value of farming, and of farmers, to the capacity to be productive. As in the normalisation of competition as a process of creating winners and losers, I show that structural adjustment normalises farmer exits as an essential step in maximising industry efficiency and productivity. I then develop this idea further by arguing that these reductionist policy constructions externalise the social and environmental consequences of the neoliberalisation of Australian agricultural and rural industries. Drawing on policy discourses around agriculture, specifically, structural adjustment and the construction of farmers’ identity, I explore the construction of farming as a reducible, calculable function which the state is able to act upon to meet its objective of maximising productive resource use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen Consulting, (2000), The Wheat Marketing Act 1989 – The Economic Impact of Competitive Restrictions, Sydney: Allen Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argent, N., (2005), The neoliberal seduction: Governing-at-a-distance, community development and the battle over financial services provision in Australia, Geographical Research, 43(1), pp. 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, D., Dixon, J., and Lawrence, G., (2013), Introduction to the symposium on the changing role of supermarkets in global supply chains: From seedling to supermarket: Agrifood supply chains in transition, Agriculture and Human Values, 30, pp. 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, L., and Lawrence, G., (2005), Neoliberalism, Individualisation and Community: Regional Restructuring in Australia, Social Identities, 11(5), pp. 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J., (2015), Distant agricultural landscapes, Sustain Sci, 10, pp. 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia, (2013), Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper: Terms of reference, [online] http://agwhitepaper.agriculture.gov.au/supporting-information/key-documents/terms-of-reference [Accessed December 12 2016].

  • Commonwealth of Australia, (2015), Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper: Stronger farmers, stronger communities, [online] http://agwhitepaper.agriculture.gov.au/ [Accessed June 6 2016].

  • Dean, M., (1999), Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibden, J., Potter, C., and Cocklin, C., (2009), Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia, Journal of Rural Studies, 25(3), pp. 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, M., (2014), ‘Like gold with yield’: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance, Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), pp. 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Review, (1992), The best in the bush, August 28 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F., (2011), Responsible agents: Responsibility and the changing relationship between farmers and the state. Rural Society 20(2): 128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E., Oss-Emer, M., and Sheng, Y., (2014), Australian agricultural productivity growth: Past reforms and future opportunities, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Research Report 14.2, Canberra, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., Dibden, J., and Cocklin, C., (2015), Private agri-food governance and greenhouse gas abatement: Constructing a corporate carbon economy, Geoforum, 66, pp. 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., (2002), Constructing reform: Economic expertise and the governing of agricultural change in Australia, New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., (2001), Governing the boundaries of viability: Economic expertise and the production of the ‘low income farm problem’ in Australia, Sociologia Ruralis, 41(3), pp. 358–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., and Lockie, S., (2002), Re-discovering the social: neo-liberalism and hybrid practices of governing in rural natural resource management, Journal of Rural Studies, 18, pp. 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilmer, F, Rayner, M., and Taperell, G., (1993), National Competition Policy Review, [online] http://ncp.ncc.gov.au/docs/National%20Competition%20Policy%20Review%20report,%20The%20Hilmer%20Report,%20August%201993.pdf [Accessed July 30 2015].

  • Industry Commission, (1991), Statutory marketing arrangements for primary products, Report No. 10, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, M., Arney, J., and Linder, B., (2000), National Competition Policy review of the Wheat Marketing Act 1989, Canberra: National Competition Policy – Wheat Marketing Act Review Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopke, P., O’Donnell, V., and Shepherd, A., (2000), Productivity growth in the Australian grains industry, ABARE Research Report 2000.1, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W., (2000), Post-welfarist state governance: Towards a code of social and family responsibility, Social Politics 7(2): 244–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G., Richards, C., and Lyons, K., (2013), Food security in Australia in an era of neoliberalism, productivism and climate change, Journal of Rural Studies, 29(1), pp. 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie S, and Higgins, V., (2007), Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance, Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., and Clapp, J., (2015), Finance for agriculture or agriculture for finance?, Journal of Agrarian Change, 15(4), pp. 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, K., (2008), Transforming Scotland’s public-sector housing through community ownership: The reterritorialisation of housing governance, Space and Polity, 12(2), pp. 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., and Rose, N., (1990), Governing economic life, Economy and Society, 19(1), pp. 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S., Burch, D., and Clapp, J., (2012), Cereal Secrets: The world’s largest grain traders and global agriculture, [online] http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/rr-cereal-secrets-grain-traders-agriculture-30082012-en.pdf [Accessed October 28 2014].

  • Nevile, J., (1971), The government, the economy and productivity, in Nevile, J., Le Couteur, G., and Bell, H., (eds), Productivity, Sydney: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nossal, K., and Gooday, P., (2009), Raising productivity growth in Australian agriculture, ABARE project 3425, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nossal, K., Zhao, S., Sheng, Y., and Gunasekera, D., (2009), Productivity movements in Australian agriculture, Australian Commodities, 16(1), pp. 206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, B., (2005), Unpacking the neoliberal approach to regional policy: A close reading of John Freebairn’s ‘Economic policy for rural and regional Australia’, Geographical Research, 43(1), pp. 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission, (2010), Wheat export marketing arrangements: Report no. 51, AGPS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission, (2005), Trends in Australian agriculture, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission into Grain Storage, Handling and Transport, (1988), Royal Commission into Grain Storage, Handling and Transport, Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, (2007), Drivers of structural change in Australian agriculture, RIRDC Publication No 07/057, Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, T., (2017), Cargill’s corporate growth in times of crisis: How agro-commodity traders are increasing profits in the midst of volatility, Agriculture and Human Values, 34, pp. 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sippel, S., Larder, N., and Lawrence, G., (2017), Grounding the financialisation of farmland: Perspectives on financial actors as new land owners in rural Australia, Agriculture and Human Values, 34(2), pp. 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Keeffe, P. (2019). Productivism, Financialisation, and the “Good Farmer”: Constructing a Rational, Governable Farming Sector. In: Making Markets in Australian Agriculture. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3519-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3519-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3518-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3519-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics