Abstract
In this chapter the role of motivation in gifted education will be discussed. Although theories of giftedness have often included motivation as an important component of giftedness (Clinkenbeard, 2012), most research on motivation in giftedness has sought to establish the motivational characteristics of gifted students (Albaili, 2003). As a result, less is known about how different motivational factors impact gifted students’ academic development and outcomes. Thus, building on arguments by Martin (2002, 2017) and recent research in gifted education, the present chapter examines key motivational issues that are especially relevant for gifted students. First, we discuss attribution, control beliefs and self-worth protection. These are well-established areas of motivation that affect gifted students’ motivation and learning. Herein we examine the implications of these factors for talent development and how to support gifted students in their use of adaptive rather than maladaptive motivational strategies. Next, we discuss recent developments within motivational research, namely, an increased focus on growth orientation and how such an orientation may benefit gifted students. Specifically, we discuss the role of growth goal setting (Burns et al., 2018a, 2018b; Martin, 2006) and growth mindset (Dweck, 2012). Following from this we provide practical strategies for teachers, practitioners, and parents to promote growth orientation among gifted students and describe how these strategies may support gifted students’ talent development. Lastly, we discuss implications for future research regarding motivation and giftedness. Taken together, this chapter provides a substantial review of how different motivational factors may impact gifted students’ learning and discusses new developments and strategies in motivational research that may be effective for gifted students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Albaili, M. A. (2003). Motivational goal orientations of intellectually gifted achieving and underachieving students in the United Arab Emirates. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.2.107
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., Ihrig, D., & Forstadt, L. (2006). Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000402
Broda, M., Yun, J., Schneider, B., Yeager, D. S., Walton, G. M., & Diemer, M. (2018). Reducing inequality in academic success for incoming college students: A randomized trial of growth mindset and belonging interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11, 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2018.1429037
Burns, E. C., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2018a). Adaptability, personal best (PB) goal setting, and gains in students’ academic outcomes: A longitudinal examination from a social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.001
Burns, E. C., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2018b). Understanding the role of personal best (PB) goal setting in students’ declining engagement: A latent growth model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000291
Chan, D. W. (2010a). Healthy and unhealthy perfectionists among academically gifted Chinese students in Hong Kong: Do different classification schemes make a difference? Roeper Review, 32, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783191003587876
Chan, D. W. (2010b). Perfectionism among Chinese gifted and nongifted students in Hong Kong: The use of the revised almost perfect scale. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 68–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400104
Chan, D. W. (2012). Life satisfaction, happiness, and the growth mindset of healthy and unhealthy perfectionists among Hong Kong Chinese gifted students. Roeper Review, 34, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.715333
Chan, L. K. S. (1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000403
Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1996). Research on motivation and the gifted: Implications for identification, programming, and evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000407
Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 622–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21628
Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2014). Is being gifted a social handicap? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214521486
Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., & Ginns, P. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.002
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, J. R., O’Reilly, C., Kim, M., Mammadov, S., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Social coping and self-concept among young gifted students in Ireland and the United States: A cross-cultural study. High Ability Studies, 26, 39–61. https://doi-org.libproxy.nie.edu.sg/10.1080/13598139.2015.1031881
Cross, T. L., Coleman, L. J., & Terhaar-Yonkers, M. (2014). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214521492
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Dai, D. Y. (2000). To be or not to be (challenged), that is the question: Task and ego orientations among high-ability, high achieving adolescents. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600641
Dai, D. Y. (2001). A comparison of gender differences in academic self-concept and motivation between high-ability and average Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2001-361
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented. Sydney: Allyn & Bacon.
Dixon, F. A., Lapsley, D. K., & Hanchon, T. A. (2004). An empirical typology of perfectionism in gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800203
Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature. American Psychologist, 67, 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029783
Esparza, J., Shumow, L., & Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Growth mindset of gifted seventh grade students in science. NCSSSMST Journal, 19, 6–13. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1045824.pdf
Fried-Buchalter, S. (1992). Fear of success, fear of failure, and the impostor phenomenon: A factor analytic approach to convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5802_13
Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900302
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682
Gagné, F. (2010). Motivation within the DGMT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2010.525341
Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198909553207
Hertzog, N. B. (2017). Designing the learning context in school for talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217705712
Jung, J. Y., Barnett, K., Gross, M. U. M., & McCormick, J. (2011). Levels of intellectual giftedness, culture, and the forced-choice dilemma. Roeper Review, 33, 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.580501
Košir, K., Horvat, M., Aram, U., & Jurinec, N. (2016). Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27, 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108186
Kroesbergen, E. H., van Hooijdonk, M., Van Viersen, S., Middel-Lalleman, M. M. N., & Reijnders, J. J. W. (2016). The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215609113
Lau, K., & Chan, D. W. (2001). Motivational characteristics of under-achievers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 21, 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120090803
Lerner, R. (2005). Promoting positive youth development: Theoretical and empirical bases. Washington, DC: National Research Council/Institute of Medicine.
Liem, G. A. D., Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., Stone, B., & Herrett, M. (2012). Personal best goals and academic and social functioning: A longitudinal perspective. Learning and Instruction, 22, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.003
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35–year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705
Lüftenegger, M., Kollmayer, M., Bergsmann, E., Jöstl, G., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095075
Makel, M. C., Snyder, K. E., Thomas, C., Malone, P. S., & Putallaz, M. (2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215599057
Martin, A. J. (2002). Motivating the gifted and talented: Lessons from research and practice. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 24, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2015.0016
Martin, A. J. (2006). Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X55389
Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X118036
Martin, A. J. (2013). Improving the achievement, motivation, and engagement of students with ADHD: The role of personal best goals and other growth-based approaches. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2013.4
Martin, A. J. (2014). Implicit theories about intelligence and growth (personal best) goals: Exploring reciprocal relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12038
Martin, A. J. (2017). How to motivate and engage students who are gifted. Midland, WA: Australian Mensa Inc.
Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00008-5
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205
Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
Mendaglio, S. (2013). Gifted students’ transition to university. Gifted Educational International, 29, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429412440646
Neumeister, K. L. S., & Finch, H. (2006). Perfectionism in high-ability students: Relational precursors and influences on achievement motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000304
Neumeister, K. L. S., Fletcher, K. L., & Burney, V. H. (2015). Perfectionism and achievement motivation in high-ability students: An examination of the 2 × 2 model of perfectionism. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215592502
Park, S., Callahan, C. M., & Ryoo, J. H. (2016). Assessing gifted students’ beliefs about intelligence with a psychometrically defensible scale. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39, 288–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216671835
Parker, W. D. (2000). Healthy perfectionism in the gifted. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2000-632
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2002). If at first you don’t succeed: False hopes of self-change. American Psychologist, 57, 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.677
Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., Stumpf, E., Motschenbacher, M., Vogl, K., & Schneider, W. (2017). A test of the reciprocal-effects model of academic achievement and academic self-concept in regular classes and special classes for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216687824
Rea, D. (2001). Maximizing the motivated mind for emergent giftedness. Roeper Review, 23, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554088
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
Rienzo, C., Rolfe, H., & Wilkinson, D. (2015). Changing mindsets: Evaluation Report and executive summary. London, England: Education Endowment Foundation.
Rimm, S. B. (1995). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it. New York, NY: Crown.
Rimm, S. B., Siegle, D., & Davis, G. A. (2018). Education of the gifted and talented (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Rinn, A. N., Boazman, J., Jackson, A., & Barrio, B. (2014). Locus of control, academic self-concept, and academic dishonesty among high ability college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14, 88–114. https://doi.org/10.14434/v14i4.12770
Rubenstein, L. D., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., & Burton, M. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620
Schmitz, B., & Skinner, E. (1993). Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Interindividual, intraindividual, and multivariate time-series analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.1010
Schuler, P. A. (2000). Perfectionism and the gifted adolescent. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 183–196. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2000-629
Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2005a). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800104
Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2005b). Motivating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B., & Roberts, A. (2017). Why I believe I achieve determines whether I achieve. High Ability Studies, 28, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355975
Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., Pollard, E., & Romey, E. (2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1302873
Skinner, E. A. (1996). Personality processes and individual differences: A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality, 71, 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.3.549
Smith, S. R. (2017). Responding to the unique social and emotional learning needs of gifted Australian students. In E. Frydenberg, A. J. Martin, & R. J. Collie (Eds.), Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific (pp. 147–166). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Snyder, K. E., Barger, M. M., Wormington, S. V., Schwartz-Bloom, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Identification as gifted and implicit beliefs about intelligence: An examination of potential moderators. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13507971
Snyder, K. E., Malin, J. L., Dent, A. L., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The message matters: The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034553
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
Tan, L. S., & Chun, K. Y. N. (2014). Perfectionism and academic emotions of gifted adolescent girls. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0114-9
Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2011). The influence of self-perception of abilities and attribution styles on academic choices: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 33, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530204
Travers, C. J., Morisano, D., & Locke, E. A. (2015). Self-reflection, growth goals, and academic outcomes: A qualitative study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12059
Vallerand, R. J., Gagné, F., Senecal, C., & Pelletier, L. G. (1994). A comparison of the school intrinsic motivation and perceived competence of gifted and regular students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800403
Vlahovic-Stetic, V., Vidovic, V., & Arambasic, L. (1999). Motivational characteristics in mathematical achievement: A study of gifted high-achieving, gifted underachieving and non-gifted pupils. High Ability Studies, 10, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813990100104
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
Wright, P. B., & Leroux, J. A. (1997). The self-concept of gifted adolescents in a congregated program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629704100304
Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1998). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0985
Ziegler, A., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Towards a systemic theory of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 23, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2012.679085
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Australian Research Council (Grant #DP140104294).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Burns, E.C., Martin, A.J. (2021). Motivational Issues in Gifted Education: Understanding the Role of Students’ Attribution and Control Beliefs, Self-Worth Protection and Growth Orientation. In: Smith, S.R. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3040-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3041-4
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education