Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards Exceptionality: The Current Status and Future Prospects of Australian Gifted Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 670 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter some challenges currently facing gifted education in Australia will be identified, and we will outline what we believe are its future prospects. To better understand these challenges, however, it is important to place gifted education within a broader educational context, including a discussion of Australian gifted education policy and Australian research into gifted education. We argue that, at best, the relevance of gifted education is being undermined by what can be described as a ‘crowded classroom’. We conclude that in order to ensure that the needs of Australian students with the potential for exceptional achievement are met, gifted education must evolve in the way it defines giftedness and implements gifted education. This evolution must take advantage of the current regulatory environment, beginning with a National Policy that focusses on the development of exceptionality, supported by a systems-based model of talent development, that is, the actiotope model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACARA. (n.d.). Australian curriculum, v8.3 F-10 curriculum: Student diversity: Gifted and talented students. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/student-diversity/gifted-and-talented-students/

  • Anderson, M. (1992). Intelligence and development: A cognitive theory. Great Britain: Blackwell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Census of population and housing: Reflecting Australia – Stories from the census, 2016 – Cultural diversity (Table 5). Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). International trade in services, by country, by state and by detailed services category, calendar year, 201. ABS (ABS Catalogue no. 5368.0.55.004). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/5368.0.55.0042015. Updated 23 May 2017.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2019a). Government expenditure on education in Australia. Canberra, ACT: Author. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/5518.0.55.001. Updated 26 April 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2019b). Population clock. Canberra, ACT: Author. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%40.nsf/94713ad445ff1425ca25682000192af2/1647509ef7e25faaca2568a900154b63?OpenDocument. Updated 14 February 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Children’s Education & Care Quality Authority. (n.d.). Australian Children’s Education & Care Quality Authority. Retrieved from https://www.acecqa.gov.au

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). ACARA: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from https://www.acara.edu.au

  • Australian Government: Department of Education. (2017). Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2015). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia, standards and procedures. Melbourne, VIC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2017). AITSL: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au

  • Australian National Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee. (2001). The education of gifted students. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Qualifications Framework. (n.d.). Australian Qualifications Framework. Retrieved from https://www.aqf.edu.au

  • Australian Skills Quality Authority. (n.d.). Australian Skills Quality Authority. Retrieved from https://www.asqa.gov.au

  • Bannister-Tyrrell, M. (2017). Gagné’s DMGT 2.0: A possible model of unification and shared understandings. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 26(2), 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: Process, themes and impact. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., & Rossi, P. H. (1999). Thinking about program evaluation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CASPer. (n.d.). You are more than your grades. CASPer is a commercially produced selection tool based on situational judgements of hypothetical scenarios. Retrieved from https://takecasper.com/about-casper/

  • Deloitte Access Economics and EduWorld. (2015). Growth and opportunity in Australian international education: A report prepared for Austrade. Melbourne, VIC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, D. (2019). High performance learning. Eyre’s high performance learning limited. Retrieved from https://www.highperformancelearning.co.uk

  • Future Unlimited. (n.d.). World class education. Australian Government. Retrieved from https://www.studyinaustralia.gov.au/english/why-australia/world-class-education

  • Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60–74). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2008). Building gifts into talents: Overview of the DMGT. Keynote address, 10th Asia-Pacific conference for giftedness. Asia-Pacific Federation of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Singapore, 14–17 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2009). The Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent. In J. Renzulli, E. Gubbins, K. McMillen, R. Eckert, & C. Little (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed., pp. 165–192). Mansfield Centre, CT: Creative Learning Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971959.n111

  • Gagné, F. (2013). The DMGT: Changes within, beneath, and beyond. Talent Development and Excellence, 5, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2018). The DMGT/IMTD: Building talented outputs of gifted inputs. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 22–31). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (2006). Driving change in special education. London, England: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Arcus, T., Boston, K., Gould, V., Johnson, W., O’Brien, L., Perry, L-A., & Roberts, M. (2018). Through growth to achievement: The report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Retrieved from Canberra https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/662684_tgta_accessible_final_0.pdf

  • Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling – Final report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/review-of-funding-for-schooling-final-report-dec-2011.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbin, J., Weissensteiner, J., Oldenziel, K., & Gagné, F. (2013). Patterns of performance development in elite athletes. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(6), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.756542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2011). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England/New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (2001). Gifted education at the beginning of the third millennium. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 10(1), 48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. C. (2018). Reflecting on the DMGT in the Australian context: Response to Merrotsy. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 27(1), 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • .idcommunity. (2017). Australia ancestry. .idcommunity. Retrieved from http://profile.id.com.au/australia/ancestry

  • Leahy, D., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Public opinions on Australian schools and schooling. Melbourne, VIC: Monash University. Retrieved from https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1653548/Education-Futures-Research-Report-Public-Opinions.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Luburic, I., & Jolly, J. L. (2019). An examination of the empirical literature: Gifted education in the Australian context. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(1), 64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (2016). Five challenges in Australian school education. Policy insights issue 5. Camberwell, VIC: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, M. (2007). Such is life … in the land down under: Conceptions of giftedness in Australia. In S. N. Phillipson & M. McCann (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 413–458). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, G. E., Osborne, M. S., Barrett, M. S., Davidson, J. W., & Faulkner, R. (2015). Motivation to study music in Australian schools: The impact of music learning, gender, and socio-economic status. Research Studies in Music Education., 1, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X15600914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrotsy, P. (2017). Gagné’s differentiated model of giftedness and talent in Australian education. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 26(2), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy. (2016). NAP: National Assessment Program. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu.au

  • North, B., & Griffiths, K. (2019). Revisiting gifted education. Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, NSW Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au/publications-filter/revisiting-gifted-education

  • OECD. (2019). Private spending on education (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/6e70bede-en. Accessed 14 Feb 2019.

  • Phillipson, S., Ku, K. Y. L., & Phillipson, S. N. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing educational achievement: A sociocultural perspective. London, England/New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Children’s cognitive ability and their academic achievement: The mediation effects of parental expectations. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S., & Phillipson, S. N. (2017). Generalizability in the mediation effects of parental expectations on children’s cognitive ability and self-concept. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(12), 3388–3400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0836-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S., Phillipson, S. N., & Kewalramani, S. (2018). Cultural variability in the educational and learning capitals of Australian families and its relationship with children’s numeracy outcomes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218799484. Online First.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S. N., Kaur, I., & Phillipson, S. (2003). A late developer-gifted education in Malaysia within a global context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 12(2), 135–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S. N., & Phillipson, S. (2017). Australian parents speak: Perceptions of the quality of their educational environment. Unpublished Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S. N., Phillipson, S., & Eyre, D. M. (2011). Being gifted in Hong Kong: An examination of the region’s policy for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(4), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211421959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S. N., Phillipson, S., & Francis, M. A. (2017). Validation of the family educational and learning capitals questionnaire in Australia. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40, 350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217734373. Online First.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S. N., Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2013). Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the actiotope model of giftedness. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2007). Gifted education in Australia: A story of striving for balance. Gifted Education International, 23, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portenga, S. T. (2019). High-performance talent development in golf. In R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius, & F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 23–58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What Makes Giftedness? Reexamining a Definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, F. (2016). What are the main challenges facing teacher education in Australia? The Conversation. The Conversation Media Group Ltd. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/what-are-the-main-challenges-facing-teacher-education-in-australia-63658

  • Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2015). A model of twice-exceptionality: Explaining and defining the apparent paradoxical combination of disability and giftedness in childhood. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 318–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, E. (2018). The identification of gifted children in Australia: The importance of policy. TalentEd, 30, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeger, H., Greindl, T., Kuhlman, J., & Balestrini, D. P. (2017). The learning and educational capital of male and female students in STEM magnet schools and in extracurricular STEM programs: A study in high-achiever-track secondary schools in Germany. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217734374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45–59). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2017a). Australian Government: Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. Retrieved from https://www.teqsa.gov.au.

  • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2017b). CRICOS registration. Retrieved from https://www.teqsa.gov.au/cricos-registration

  • Tomlinson, M. M. (2010). A gifted musician: Socio-cultural and educational perspectives related to the development of musical understanding in gifted adolescents. Australian Journal of Music Education, 2, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities Australia. (2018). Quality central to Australia’s international education success story. Universities Australia. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/Media-and-Events/media-releases/Quality-central-to-Australia-s-international-education-success-story#.XGYfIy2B1Zi

  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2009). United States policy development in gifted education: A patchwork quilt. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1295–1312). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veas, A., Castejon, J.-L., O’Reilly, C., & Ziegler, A. (2018). Mediation analysis of the relationship between educational capital, learning capital, and underachievement among gifted secondary school students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218799436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vialle, W. (2007). Pink or Paris? Giftedness in popular culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 16(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialle, W. (2017). Supporting giftedness in families: A resources perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vialle, W., Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2005). The relationship between self-esteem and academic achievement in high ability students: Evidence from the Wollongong Youth Study. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14(2), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Institute of Teaching. (2019). Registering as a teacher. Retrieved from https://www.vit.vic.edu.au/registering-as-a-teacher

  • Vladut, A., Liu, Q., Leana-Tascilar, M. Z., Vialle, W., & Ziegler, A. (2013). A cross-cultural validation study of the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) in China, Germany and Turkey. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55, 462–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladut, A., Vialle, W., & Ziegler, A. (2015). Learning resources within the actiotope: A validation study of the QELC (questionnaire of educational and learning capital). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 57, 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. L, & Jolly, J. L. (2018). Gifted Education in the Australian Context. Gifted Child Today, 41(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517750702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. (2014). Mapping MI to the DMGT: A theoretical framework. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 23(2), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J. (2010). Career decision making among gifted students: The mediation of teachers. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 222–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, M. (2016). Gagné’s DMGT and underachiever: The need for an alternative inclusive gifted model. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 25(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, M. (2017). Re-introduction of cognitive screening for all school children. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 26(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S., Graham, L., & Blaas, S. (2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A. (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 411–436). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Baker, J. (2013). Talent development as adaptation: The role of educational and learning capital. In S. N. Phillipson, H. Stoeger, & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the actiotope model of giftedness (pp. 18–39). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., Balestrini, D. P., & Stoeger, H. (2018). An international view of gifted education: Incorporating the macro-systemic perspective. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 15–28). Cham, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., Chandler, K., Vialle, W., & Stoeger, H. (2017). Exogenous and endogenous learning resources in the actiotope model of giftedness and its significance for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40, 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217734376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Towards a systemic theory of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 23, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2012.679085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2017). Systemic gifted education. A theoretical introduction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217705713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., & Balestrini, D. (2017). Systemic gifted education. In J. Riedl Cross, C. O’Reilly, & T. Cross (Eds.), Providing for the special needs of students with gifts and talents (pp. 15–55). Dublin, Ireland: Kazoo Independent Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., Vialle, W., & Wimmer, B. (2013). The actiotope model of giftedness: A short introduction to some central theoretical assumptions. In S. Phillipson, H. Stoeger, & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Exceptionality in East-Asia: Explorations in the actiotope model of giftedness (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Peninsula Campus, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia

    Shane N. Phillipson

  2. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany

    Albert Ziegler

Authors
  1. Shane N. Phillipson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert Ziegler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shane N. Phillipson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Susen R. Smith

Section Editor information

  1. Faculty of Education, The University of Waikato, Waikato, New Zealand

    Roger Moltzen

Appendix

Appendix

The policy documents used in the valuation are:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Phillipson, S.N., Ziegler, A. (2019). Towards Exceptionality: The Current Status and Future Prospects of Australian Gifted Education. In: Smith, S. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_2-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_2-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3021-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3021-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation