Skip to main content

Comparative Chemical Evaluation of Vermicompost Produced by Using Different Organic Wastes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Waste Valorisation and Recycling

Abstract

The organic bio-fertilizers produced by using earthworms may replace inorganic fertilizers and their use can increase yield and quality of agriculture products, which is required nowadays. Eisenia fetida (red worm) is the most prominent species of earthworms used for the production of vermicompost so this species can be used for organic waste management. During the present investigation, vermicompost samples prepared from different organic wastes are cow dung, cow dung + congress grass, (Parthenium hysterophorus), cow dung + kitchen waste and cow dung + mixture of different weeds (Parthenium hysterophorus, Lantana camara and chenopodium album). The changes in the micronutrients like C:N ratio, potassium, phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon were observed with a time interval of 0, 30, 60, and 90 days and it was observed that nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorous contents in each samples of vermicompost under investigation increased but found maximum in the kitchen waste.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beauchamp CJ, Levesque G, Prevost D, Chalifour FP (2006) Isolation of free-living dinitrogen-fixing bacteria and their activity in compost containing de-inking paper sludge. Biores Technol 97:1002–1011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhardwaj A (2010) Management of kitchen waste through vermicomposting. Asian Exp Biol Sci 1(1):175–177

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner JM, Mulvancey RG (1982) Nitrogen total. Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 575–624

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabrera ML, Kissel DE, Vigil MF (2005) Nitrogen mineralization from organic residues: research opportunities. J Environ Qual 34:75–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhuri PS, Pal TK, Dey SK (2000) Chemical changes during vermicomposting (Perionyx excavatus) of kitchen wastes. Trop Ecol 41(1):107–110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ismail SA (1996) Vermicompost and vermiwash. The organic farming source book, C. Alvares. The other India Press, Mopusa, Goa, pp 170–177

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  8. John MK (1970) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant material with ascorbic acid. Soil Sci 109:214–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Joshi PC, Chauhan A (2010) Composting of some dangerous and toxic weeds using E. fetida. J Am Sci 6(3)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kale RD (1995) Vermicomposting has a bright scope. Indian Silk 34:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mansell GP, Syers JK, Gregg PEH (1981) Plant availability of phosphorous in dead herbage ingested by surface-casting earthworms. Soil Biol Biochem 13:163–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mondini C, Dell’Abate M, T Leita L, Beneditti A (2003) An integrated chemical, thermal and microbiological approach to compost stability evaluation. J. Environ. Qual 32: 2379–2386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nathia S, Scinduja M, Suganya K, Nandhini JV, Jaya SP (2015) Experimental study on biodegradation of garden waste, market waste using Eisenia fetida & Eudrilus Eugenia and checking the quality of manure on tomato. International Journal of Engineering science & research technology 4(3):2277–9655

    Google Scholar 

  14. Perekh SA, Mehta MJ (2015) Vermicomposting as sustainable option for organic waste management. International Journal of Innovative and Emerging Research in Engineering 2:2394–5394

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stockli (1928) Studies on the influences of earthworm on the soil condition, Journal of soil 22: 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tripathi G, Bhardwaj P (2004) Decomposition of kitchen waste amended with cow manure using on epegeic species (E.fetida) and on anecic species (Lampito mauritii). Biores Technol 92:215–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Whiston RA, Seal KL (1988) The occurrence of cellular in the earthworms, Eisenia fetida. Biol Wastes 25:239–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang BG, Li GT, Shen TS, Wang JK, Sun Z (2000) Changes in microbial biomass C, N, and P and enzyme activities in soil incubated with the earthworms Metaphire guillelmi or Eisenia foetida. Soil Biol Bioche 32:2055–2062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parveen Gill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gill, P., Singh, D., Gupta, R.K., Urmila, Lata, H. (2019). Comparative Chemical Evaluation of Vermicompost Produced by Using Different Organic Wastes. In: Ghosh, S. (eds) Waste Valorisation and Recycling. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2784-1_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics