Skip to main content

Bringing the Benefits of Agile Techniques Inside the Classroom: A Practical Guide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning

Abstract

Besides professional programmers, many “end-user programmers” write code in their daily life. Given that so much of end-user-created software suffers from quality problems, Software Engineering (SE) is no longer solely applicable to the professional context: a clear computational processing can be useful in everyday life. While the expansion of programming skills acquisition initiatives in K-12 (i.e., primary and secondary schools) has contributed to improving learners’ coding ability, there have not been many studies devoted to the teaching/learning of SE concepts. In this chapter, we focus on understanding how it is possible to bring the benefits of Agile techniques inside the classroom. Moreover, our goal is to show how each selected practice (such as user stories and pair programming) can be leveraged or adapted to the educational context; to this end, tools already adopted in schools are considered as possible substitutes of professional ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.agilealliance.org/agile101/the-agile-manifesto/.

  2. 2.

    https://scratch.mit.edu.

References

  • Alégroth, E., Burden, H., Ericsson, M., Hammouda, I., Knauss, E., & Steghöfer, J.-P. (2015). Teaching scrum—What we did, what we will do and what impedes us. Proceedings of XP, 212, 361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrachan, O., Duvall, R. C., & Wallingford, E. (2001). Bringing extreme programming to the classroom. In XP Universe (Vol. 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, S. (2002). Extreme programming practices in action. Pearson Education, Informit. Retrieved from http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=30187.

  • Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, M. (2009). What is end-user software engineering and why does it matter? In International Symposium on End User Development (pp. 15–28).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, M. M., & Myers, B. A. (2014). Future of end-user software engineering: Beyond the silos. In Proceedings of the on Future of Software Engineering (pp. 201–211).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, B. (2010). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal, M. (2013). Executable specifications with scrum: A practical guide to agile requirements discovery. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimalakonda, S., & Nori, K. V. (2013). What makes it hard to teach software engineering to end users? Some directions from adaptive and personalized learning. In 2013 IEEE 26th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T) (pp. 324–328).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, M. (2005). Agile estimating and planning. Pearson Education.


    Google Scholar 

  • Costabile, M. F., Mussio, P., Parasiliti Provenza, L., & Piccinno, A. (2008). End users as unwitting software developers. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on End-User Software Engineering (pp. 6–10). New York, NY, USA: ACM.


    Google Scholar 

  • Di Bella, E., Fronza, I., Phaphoom, N., Sillitti, A., Succi, G., & Vlasenko, J. (2013). Pair programming and software defects—A large, industrial case study. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 39(7), 930–953.


    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingsyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213–1221 (Special Issue: Agile Development).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, X. (2001). Using a coding standard to improve program quality. In Proceedings of the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software, 2001 (pp. 73–78).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., Janes, A., Sillitti, A., Succi, G., & Corral, L. (2014). If I had to vote on this laboratory, I would give nine: Introduction on computational thinking in the lower secondary school: Results of the experience. Mondo Digitale, 13(51), 757–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., & Corral, L. (2015a). Students want to create apps: Leveraging computational thinking to teach mobile software development. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 21–26).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., & Corral, L. (2015b). Students want to create apps: Leveraging computational thinking to teach mobile software development. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 21–26). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., & Corral, L. (2016a). Blending mobile programming and liberal education in a social-economic high school. In International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, MOBILEsoft 2016 (pp. 123–126).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., & Corral, L. (2016b). Computational thinking through mobile programming. In International Conference on Mobile Web and Information Systems (pp. 67–80).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., & Corral, L. (2016c). Teaching software design engineering across the K-12 curriculum: Using visual thinking and computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 97–101).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., Ioini, N. E., & Corral, L. (2017). Teaching computational thinking using agile software engineering methods: A framework for middle schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(4), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronza, I., & Succi, G. (2009). Modeling spontaneous pair programming when new developers join a team. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Agile Processes and Extreme Programming in Software Engineering (XP2009), Pula, Italy, May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. A., Herstand, M. S., Hodges, J. W., & Kelleher, C. L. (2010). A code reuse interface for non-programmer middle school students. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 219–228).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastl, P., Kiesmüller, U., & Romeike, R. (2016). Starting out with projects: Experiences with agile software development in high schools. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 60–65). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, M., & Meier, A. (2013). Teaching agile software development at university level: Values, management, and craftsmanship. In 2013 IEEE 26th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T) (pp. 179–188).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottero-Perdue, P. S., & Parry, E. A. (2017). Perspectives on failure in the classroom by elementary teachers new to teaching engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(1), 4.


    Google Scholar 

  • Mahnic, V. (2012). A capstone course on agile software development using scrum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(1), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meerbaum-Salant, O., & Hazzan, O. (2010). An agile constructionist mentoring methodology for software projects in the high school. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 9(4), n4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikre, F. (2010). The roles of assessment in curriculum practice and enhancement of learning. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, I. T., de Castro Salgado, L. C., Mota, M. P., Sampaio, A. L., & de Souza, C. S. (2017). Signifying software engineering to computational thinking learners with AgentSheets and polifacets. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 40, 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moye, J. J., Dugger, W. E., Jr., & Starkweather, K. N. (2014). “Learn by doing” research: Introduction. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 74(1), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. J., Sandler, C., & Badgett, T. (2011). The art of software testing. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasivaara, M., Heikkilä, V., Lassenius, C., & Toivola, T. (2014). Teaching students scrum using lego blocks. In Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 382–391). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, S., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D., & Neale, H. (2003). Using tangibles to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interacting with Computers, 15(2), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romeike, R., & Göttel, T. (2012). Agile projects in high school computing education: Emphasizing a learners’ perspective. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 48–57). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steghöfer, J.-P., Knauss, E., Alégroth, E., Hammouda, I., Burden, H., & Ericsson, M. (2016). Teaching agile: Addressing the conflict between project delivery and application of agile methods. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (pp. 303–312).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (2014). Promoting and managing effective collaborative group work. Belfast Education and Library Board. Retrieved from http://www.belb.org.uk/Downloads/iepdpromotingandmanagingcollaborativegroupworkmay14.pdf.

  • Stewart, J. C., DeCusatis, C. S., Kidder, K., Massi, J. R., & Anne, K. M. (2009). Evaluating agile principles in active and cooperative learning. In Proceedings of Student-Faculty Research Day, CSIS, Pace University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1996). Cognitive science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traynor, B. (2012). Rapid paper prototyping: 100 design sketches in 10 minutes, 18 designs presented, 6 prototypes tested, student engagement-priceless! In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Umarji, M., Pohl, M., Seaman, C., Koru, A. G., & Liu, H. (2008). Teaching software engineering to end-users. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on End-User Software Engineering (pp. 40–42).

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Lelie, C. (2006, April 01). The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(2), 159–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Emden, E., & Moonen, L. (2002). Java quality assurance by detecting code smells. In Ninth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, 2002. Proceedings (pp. 97–106).


    Google Scholar 

  • Walny, J., Carpendale, S., Riche, N. H., Venolia, G., & Fawcett, P. (2011). Visual thinking in action: Visualizations as used on whiteboards. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2508–2517.


    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L., & Kessler, R. (2002). Pair programming illuminated. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y., & Fischer, G. (2007). Designing for participation in socio-technical software systems. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity (pp. 312–321). Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilenia Fronza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., Pahl, C., Corral, L. (2019). Bringing the Benefits of Agile Techniques Inside the Classroom: A Practical Guide. In: Parsons, D., MacCallum, K. (eds) Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2750-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2751-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics