Skip to main content

Application of MCDM Techniques on Nonconventional Machining of Composites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Futuristic Composites

Abstract

This study has been carried out to assess the impact of electrical discharge machining parameters on the SiC-reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites. The criteria in machining process including electrodes material, current, pulse time, and dielectric medium were diversified to evaluate their effect on material removal rate (MRR), surface roughness (SR), and residual stresses. The residual stresses induced due to subsequent heating and cooling shocks during the electric discharge process are of primary concern while machining process. The magnitude of residual stresses induced on the machined surface was estimated via X-ray diffraction method. The process conditions that influenced the responses were recognized and optimized synchronically using multiple criteria decision-making and statistical techniques. In this study, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and a multi-objective optimization analysis (MOORA) will solve process condition problem. This approach confers the combination of process parameter settings suitable for the machining of such composites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Callister WD (2004) Composites. Materials science and engineering an introduction, 6th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 527–560

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahamed AR, Asokan P, Aravindan S (2009) EDM of hybrid Al–SiCp–B4Cp and Al–SiCp–Glassp MMCs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(5–6):520–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bains PS, Sidhu SS, Payal HS (2016) Fabrication and machining of metal matrix composites: a review. Mater Manuf Processes 31(5):553–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schachra A, Lenz E (1976) LBM and EDM—a comparison on crack behavior. Ann CIRP 25:121–123

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sidhu SS, Batish A, Kumar S (2014) Study of surface properties in particulate-reinforced metal matrix composites (MMCs) using powder-mixed electrical discharge machining (EDM). Mater Manuf Process 29(1):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng X, Wong YS, Hong GS (2016) Characterization and geometric modeling of single and overlapping craters in micro-EDM. Mach Sci Technol Int J 20(1):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gill AS, Kumar S (2016) Surface roughness and microhardness evaluation for EDM with Cu–Mn powder metallurgy tool. Mater Manuf Processes 31(4):514–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pal VK, Choudhury SK (2016) Fabrication and analysis of complex-shape tool for EDM by AWJM process. Adv Mater Process Technol 1(3–4):444–452

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hocheng H, Lei WT, Hsu HS (1997) Preliminary study of material removal in electrical-discharge machining of SiC/Al. J Mater Process Technol 63(1):813–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh PN, Raghukandan K, Pai BC (2004) Optimization by grey relational analysis of EDM parameters on machining Al–10% SiC P composites. J Mater Process Technol 155:1658–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garg RK, Singh KK, Sachdeva A, Sharma VS, Ojha K, Singh S (2010) Review of research work in sinking EDM and WEDM on metal matrix composite materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(5–8):611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Majumder A, Das PK, Majumder A, Debnath M (2014) An approach to optimize the EDM process parameters using desirability-based multi-objective PSO. Prod Manuf Res 2(1):228–240

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh PN, Raghukandan K, Rathinasabapathi M, Pai BC (2004) Electric discharge machining of Al–10% SiC p as-cast metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 155:1653–1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuriakose S, Shunmugam MS (2005) Multi-objective optimization of wire-electro discharge machining process by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 170(1):133–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tzeng YF, Chen FC (2007) Multi-objective optimisation of high-speed electrical discharge machining process using a Taguchi fuzzy-based approach. Mater Des 28(4):1159–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sidhu SS, Batish A, Kumar S (2013) EDM of metal matrix composite for parameter design using lexicographic goal programming. Mater Manuf Processes 28(4):495–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Residual stress. Part 1–measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 17(4):355–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sidhu SS, Batish A, Kumar S (2013) Fabrication and electrical discharge machining of metal–matrix composites: a review. J Reinf Plast Compos 32(17):1310–1320

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kalibatas D, Turskis Z (2008) Multicriteria evaluation of inner climate by using MOORA method. Inf Technol Control 37:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  20. Akkaya G, Turanoğlu B, Öztaş S (2015) An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing. Expert Syst Appl 42(24):9565–9573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chakraborty S (2011) Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(9–12):1155–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Das MC, Sarkar B, Ray S (2012) Comparative evaluation of Indian technical institutions using fuzzy AHP and MOORA. Int J Multicriteria Decis Making 2(1):74–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saaty TL (1988) What is the analytic hierarchy process?. Springer, Berlin, pp 109–121

    Google Scholar 

  25. Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6218–6224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Springer, US, pp 5–21

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK (2006) The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control Cybern 35(2):445

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Kildienė S (2014) State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(1):165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Balezentis T, Balezentis A (2014) A survey on development and applications of the multi-criteria decision making method MULTIMOORA. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 21(3–4):209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stanujkic D (2016) An extension of the ratio system approach of MOORA method for group decision-making based on interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers. Technol Econ Dev Econ 22(1):122–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brauers WKM, Ginevičius R, Podvezko V (2010) Regional development in Lithuania considering multiple objectives by the MOORA method. Technol Econ Dev Econ 16(4):613–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Karande P, Chakraborty S (2012) Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater Des 37:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lazauskas M et al (2015) Multicriteria assessment of unfinished construction projects. Gradevinar 67(4):319–328

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ross PJ (1998) Taguchi techniques for quality engineering. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, p 228

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sidhu SS, Batish A, Kumar S (2015) Analysis of residual stresses in particulate reinforced aluminum matrix composite after EDM. J Mater Sci Technol 31(15):1850–1859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Welzel U, Ligot J, Lamparter P, Vermeulen AC, Mittemeijer EJ (2005) Stress analysis of polycrystalline thin films and surface regions by X-ray diffraction. J Appl Crystallogr 38(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saaty TL (2001) Fundamentals of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, Netherlands, pp 15–35

    Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Harbi KMAS (2001) Application of the AHP in project management. Int J Project Manage 19(1):19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Whitaker R (2007) Validation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process. Math Comput Model 46(7):840–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Taha AH (2008) Decision analysis and games. Operation research an introduction, 9th edn. Pearson education, India, pp 503–511

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarabjeet Singh Sidhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sidhu, S.S., Bains, P.S., Yazdani, M., Zolfaniab, S.H. (2018). Application of MCDM Techniques on Nonconventional Machining of Composites. In: Sidhu, S., Bains, P., Zitoune, R., Yazdani, M. (eds) Futuristic Composites . Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2417-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics