Abstract
After the evolution of semantic web technologies, ontology’s play the key role in Knowledge representation, Knowledge Management, and information retrieval. Ontology can be defined as the grammar that can be interpreted by the machine. In short, it is defined as concept or term, which is used to represent the Knowledge. The aim of this paper is to give the comparative study of different ontology building and management tool (Protégé 4.3, Swoop, Apollo, and IsaViz) which are open source. In this paper, we will compare the mentioned tools in context of Cross-Platform Integration, Easy to update and manage, Tolerance, etc. As we are talking about World Wide Web, the diversity plays the major role as this tool can be used by the different groups of people. The mentioned tools cannot interchange the ontology’s. This research also identifies the common feature between each tool and each tool has its own significance importance, so based on that this paper will represent the comparative study of different tools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berners-Lee, T, Hendler J, Lassila O Article Title: The Semantic Web
Noy NF, McGuinness DL (2001) Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Knowl Syst Lab 25 (2001)
Kondylakis H, Flouris G, Plexousakis D (2009) Ontology and schema evolution in data integration: review and assessment. In: Proceedings of the confederated international conferences, CoopIS, DOA, IS, and ODBASE 2009 on the move to meaningful internet systems: part II, pp 932–947
Informatics SM (2010) The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System welcome to protég. Knowl Acquis 2010–2010
Protege, “protege,” Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research at the Stanford University School of Medicine. https://protege.stanford.edu/
Pietriga E “IsaViz: a visual authoring tool for RDF,” Aduna. https://www.w3.org/2001/11/IsaViz/
(UK) Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, “Apollo,” Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, (UK). http://apollo.open.ac.uk/
Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Sirin E, Grau BC, Hendler J (2006) Swoop: a web ontology editing browser. Web Semant 4(2):144–153
Su X, Ilebrekke L (2002) A comparative study of ontology languages and tools. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering 14th International Conference on CAiSE 2002, pp 761–765
Krogstie GSJ, Lindland OI (1995) Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. In: Proceeding of the IFIP8.1 working conference on information systems concepts: towards a consolidation of views. Marburg, Germany
Goguen J (1999) Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1562, no 1562–1562 Chapter 15
Uschold M, King M (1995) Towards a methodology for building ontologies. Methodology 80(July):275–280
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ranpara, R., Yusufzai, A., Kumbharana, C.K. (2019). A Comparative Study of Ontology Building Tools for Contextual Information Retrieval. In: Rathore, V., Worring, M., Mishra, D., Joshi, A., Maheshwari, S. (eds) Emerging Trends in Expert Applications and Security. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 841. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2285-3_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2285-3_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2284-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2285-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)