Skip to main content

Introduction to Autonomy and Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Autonomy and Unmanned Vehicles

Abstract

Increasing the level of autonomy allows reducing reliance on the human supervisor. Addressing autonomy in the real world with unknown events, it is strongly critical to instantaneous adaptation to the continuously changing situations. Autonomous adaptation relies on the understanding of the surrounding environment. Complicated missions that cannot be accurately defined in advance will need to be resolved through intermittent communication with a human supervisor. This will restrict the applicability and accuracy of such vehicles. A fully autonomous vehicle should have capability to consider its own position as well as, its environment, to properly react to unexpected or dynamic circumstances. This chapter aims to provide a general background of some Unmanned Vehicles (UVs) and existing difficulties on the way of having a true autonomy in their applications. Assessing the levels of autonomy and its related properties in internal and external situation awareness toward robust mission planning are also discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Special Purpose (2016) Underwater Research Vehicle (SPURV). www.navaldrones.com

  2. Witman S (2017) Detecting gas leaks with autonomous underwater vehicles. J Geophys Res Ocean 5458–5467

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iwakami H, Ura T, Asakawa K, Hujii T, Nose Y, Kojima J, Shirasaki Y, Asia T, Uchida S (2002) Approaching whales by autonomous underwater vehicle. J Mar Technol Soc 36(1):80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. An E, Dhanak M, Shay LK, Smith S (2001) Coastal oceanography using a small AUV. Atmos Ocean Technol 18:215–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams SB, Pizarro O, Jakuba M, Barrett N (2010) AUV benthic habitat mapping in South Eastern Tasmania. In: 7th International conference of field and service robotics, vol 62, pp 275–284

    Google Scholar 

  6. Djapic V, Nad D (2010) Using collaborative autonomous vehicles in mine countermeasures. In: 10th IEEE Oceans Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mahmoud Zadeh S (2017) Autonomous reactive mission scheduling and task-path planning architecture for autonomous underwater vehicle. Ph.D. thesis, Flinders University of South Australia. arXiv:1706.04189

  8. Houston-based company intuitive machines. www.intuitivemachines.com

  9. Gunetti P, Dodd T, Thompson H (2013) Simulation of a soar-based autonomous mission management system for unmanned aircraft. J Aerosp Comput Inf Commun 10(2):53–70

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Meystel AM, Albus JS (2002) Intelligent systems: architecture, design, and control. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Veres SM, Molnar L, Lincoln NK, Moric CP (2010) Autonomous vehicle control systems—a review of decision making. Inst Mech Eng Part A J Syst Control Eng 225:155–195

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson N, Patron P, Lane D (2007) The importance of trust between operator and auv: Crossing the human/computer language barrier. In: IEEE oceans Europe, pp. 1159–1164

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stenger A, Fernando B, Heni M, (2012) Autonomous mission planning for UAVs: a cognitive approach. In: Proceedings des Deutschen Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, Berlin, 10.09.-12.09.2012, DLRK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vernon D (2011) Reconciling autonomy with utility: a roadmap and architecture for cognitive development. BICA, pp 412–418

    Google Scholar 

  15. Endsley MR (1995) Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atyabi A, MahmoudZadeh S, Nefti-Meziani S (2018) Survey on autonomous mission planning and mission management systems. Ann Rev Control J. Elsevier (in progress)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strutt JE (2006) Report of the inquiry into the loss of Autosub2 under the Fimbulisen. Technical report, Nat’l Oceanography Centre

    Google Scholar 

  18. Patron P, Miguelanez E, Cartwright J, Petillot YR (2008) Semantic knowledge-based representation for improving situation awareness in service oriented agents of autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Oceans Quebec

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patron P, Lane DM, Petillot YR (2009) Interoperability of agent capabilities for autonomous knowledge acquisition and decision making in unmanned platforms. IEEE, 1-4244-2523, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patron P, Miguelanez E, Petillot YR (2011) Embedded knowledge and autonomous planning: the path towards permanent presence of underwater networks. J Auton Underw Veh 9:199–224

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chai H, Du Y (2012) A framework of situation awareness based on event extraction and correlation for military decision support. In: IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, Chengdu, China

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rashaad E, Jones T, Connors ES, Endsley MR (2009) Incorporating the human analyst into the data fusion process by modeling situation awareness using fuzzy cognitive maps. In: 12th International conference on information fusion, Seattle, WA, USA, 6–9 July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vernon D, Metta G, Sandini G (2007) A survey of artificial cognitive systems: implications for the autonomous development of mental capabilities in computational agents. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(2):151–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vernon D (2010) Enaction as a conceptual framework for developmental cognitive robotics. Paldayn J Behav Robot 1(2):89–98

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clough B (2002) Metrics, schmetrics! How the heck do you determine a UAV’s autonomy anyway? Performance metrics for intelligent system workshop, PreMIS, Gaithersburg, MD, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hasslacher B, Tilden MW (1995) Living machines. Los Alamos National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cleary M, Abramson M, Adams MB, Kolitz S (2000) Metrics for embedded collaborative intelligent systems. Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sheridan TB, Verplank WL (1978) Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators. Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, pp 8–17

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. TASK FORCE REPORT (2012) The role of autonomy in DoD systems

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

MahmoudZadeh, S., Powers, D.M.W., Bairam Zadeh, R. (2019). Introduction to Autonomy and Applications. In: Autonomy and Unmanned Vehicles. Cognitive Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2245-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics