Skip to main content

Sensitivity Analysis of Petrophysical Parameters Due to Fluid Substitution in a Sandstone Reservoir

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Petro-physics and Rock Physics of Carbonate Reservoirs

Abstract

In the present study, the CO2 storage potential of a subsurface sandstone layer of the Blackfoot field, Alberta, Canada, is evaluated. In this study, seismic reservoir monitoring has been performed to monitor fluid flow effects in seismic amplitudes. In order to monitor CO2 fluid viability, the Gassmann fluid substitution analysis is also performed to analyze the seismic amplitude response along with the seismic forward modeling which is used to generate seismic data from the geological model. From the seismic forward modeling, a significant variation in seismic amplitude is recognized due to fluid substitution. From the Gassmann approach, considerable changes in P-wave and S-wave velocities, densities, and impedances are observed with increasing CO2 saturation. From the results, it is observed that the sudden drop in acoustic impedance occurs between 0 and 20% CO2 saturation and that leads to the detectable time shift at the top of the CO2 plume. Further, amplitude versus offset (AVO) and Lambda-mu-rho (LMR) analyses have been performed to demonstrate the detectability capacity of these parameters due to the change in fluid saturation in the porous media. In addition, time delays at the injected reflector are also measured. The changes caused by the CO2 plume in the seismic section are also identified by subtracting the monitor model (CO2 saturated model) from the baseline model (0% CO2 saturated model) in time domain as well as in impedance domain. The proposed amount of CO2 injection is considered as 105 tonnes for one year of injection. The study demonstrates that the CO2 plume can be detected in a more detailed way with very high resolution by working in impedance domain rather than working in time domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bachu S, Gunter WD, Perkins EH (1994) Aquifer disposal of CO2: hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energy Convers Manage 35(4):269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick RA, Noy D, Arts R, Eiken O (2009) Latest time-lapse seismic data from Sleipner yield new insights into CO2 plume development. Energy Procedia 1(1):2103–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick A, Williams G, Delepine N, Clochard V, Labat K, Sturton S, Buddensiek ML, Dillen M, Nickel M, Lima AL, Arts R (2010) Quantitative analysis of time-lapse seismic monitoring data at the Sleipner CO2 storage operation. Lead Edge 29(2):170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanchi JR (2001) Feasibility of monitoring CO2 sequestration in a mature oil field using time-lapse seismic analysis. In: SPE/EPA/DOE exploration and production environmental conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/66569-ms

  • Gassmann F (1951) Über die elastizität poröser medien. Vierteljahrss-chrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich 96:1–23. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/berryman/PS/gassmann.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2019

  • Ghaderi A, Landrø M (2009) Estimation of thickness and velocity changes of injected carbon dioxide layers from prestack time-lapse seismic data. Geophysics 74(2):O17–O28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova A, Kashubin A, Juhojuntti N, Kummerow J, Henninges J, Juhlin C, Lüth S, Ivandic M (2012) Monitoring and volumetric estimation of injected CO2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: a case study at Ketzin, Germany. Geophys Prospect 60(5):957–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrø M (2002) Uncertainties in quantitative time-lapse seismic analysis. Geophys Prospect 50(5):527–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieson A, Midgley J, Dodds K, Wright I, Ringrose P, Saoul N (2010) CO2 sequestration monitoring and verification technologies applied at Krechba, Algeria. Lead Edge 29(2):216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi S, Lawton DC (2015) Time-lapse numerical modelling of the Quest carbon capture and storage (CCS) project. Poroelastic approach Geo-convention, Calgary, Canada. https://www.crewes.org/ForOurSponsors/ConferenceAbstracts/2015/CSEG/Moradi_1_CSEG_2015.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2019

  • Nordbotten JM, Celia MA, Bachu S (2005) Injection and storage of CO2 in deep saline aquifers: analytical solution for CO2 plume evolution during injection. Transp Porous Media 58(3):339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pevzner R, Shulakova V, Kepic A, Urosevic M (2011) Repeatability analysis of land time-lapse seismic data: CO2CRC Otway pilot project case study. Geophys Prospect 59(1):66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuey RT (1985) A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics 50(4):609–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadapalli U, Vedanti N (2016) Time-lapse seismic response evaluation based on well log data for Ankleshwar reservoir, Cambay basin, India. J Ind Geophys Union 20(5):472–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue Z, Tanase D, Watanabe J (2006) Estimation of CO2 saturation from time-lapse CO2 well logging in an onshore aquifer Nagaoka Japan. Explor Geophys 37(1):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author (SP Maurya) is indebted to Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, for the financial support in the form of National Postdoctoral Fellowship (NPDF) (grant no. PDF/2016/000888). The authors would also like to acknowledge CGGVeritas for providing data and software, without which this work could not be possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. P. Maurya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maurya, S.P., Singh, N.P., Singh, K.H. (2020). Sensitivity Analysis of Petrophysical Parameters Due to Fluid Substitution in a Sandstone Reservoir. In: Singh, K., Joshi, R. (eds) Petro-physics and Rock Physics of Carbonate Reservoirs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1211-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1211-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1210-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1211-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics