Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Systematic Literature Review of the Risk Management Process Literature for the Public Sector

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 797))

  • 2015 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is the result of a systematic review via a qualitative exploratory research approach of the risk management literature on the tools, techniques, software models, and methodologies used in private or public organizations. Publications in academic journals, book chapters, and other scientific articles were analyzed to enable the identification and definition of the techniques and applications of software and methodologies developed and used by various institutions to assist in the risk management development process. Different resources for risk management, such as agile and formal methods of management, were identified. It is worth mentioning that the revised tools, techniques, software, and methodologies were functional requirements for the later development of risk management software aimed at Brazilian public high-level educational institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Woiler S, Mathias WF (1996) Projetos: planejamento, elaboração e análise. Atlas, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tohmatsu DT, Sarbanes-Oxley L (2003) Guia para melhorar a governança corporativa através de eficazes controles internos. Deloitte, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keeling R (2002) Project management: an international perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schütz GR, Sant’ana ASS, Santos SG (2011) Política de periódicos nacionais em Educação Física para estudos de revisão sistemática. RBCDH, Santa Catarina 13(4):313–319. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n4p313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gil AC (2010) Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Atlas, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  6. PMI - Project Management Institute (2004) A guide to the project management body of knowledge. PMI Publishing Division, Sylba

    Google Scholar 

  7. COSO - Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2004) Enterprise Risk Management: Integrated Framework, 136

    Google Scholar 

  8. ABNT NBR ISO 31000 (2009) Gestao de Riscos - Princípios e Diretrizes. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marino E (2003) Manual de avaliação de projetos sociais. Saraiva, Instituto Ayrton Senna, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martins GA, Teóphilo CR (2009) Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas. Atlas, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  11. Galvão TF, Pereira MG (2014) Revisões sistemáticas da literatura: passos para sua elaboração. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde 23(1):183–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elsevier (2016) Guia de referência rápida: Scopus. Empowering Knowledge

    Google Scholar 

  13. CAPES (2017) Coordenação de aperfeiçoamento de pessoal de nível superior. Acervo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boehm BW (1991) Software risk management: principles and practices. IEEE Softw 8(1):32–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.62930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pimchangthong D, Boonjing V (2017) Effects of risk management practice on the success of IT project. Procedia Eng 182:579–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakashima, DTV, Carvalho, MM (2004) Identificação de riscos em projetos de TI. XXIV Encontro Nac. de Eng. de Produção (ENEGEP). Anais, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shrivastava SV, Rathod U (2017) A risk management framework for distributed agile projects. Inf Softw Technol 85:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kettinger WJ, Teng JTC, Guha S (1997) Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly 55–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/249742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomas RN, Alcantara RLC (2013) Models for risk management in supply chains: review, analysis, and guidelines for research. Gestão Produção 20(3):695–712. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2013000300014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Daychoum M (2013) 40 + 10 ferramentas e técnicas de gerenciamento. Brasport

    Google Scholar 

  21. Knob F et al (2006) RiskFree–Uma ferramenta de gerenciamento de riscos baseada no PMBOK e aderente ao CMMI. V simpósio brasileiro de qualidade de software, 203–217

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oehmen J et al (2014) Analysis of the effect of risk management practices on the performance of new product development programs. Technovation 34(8):441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wibowo A, Taufik J (2017) Developing a self-assessment model of risk management maturity for client organizations of public construction projects: Indonesian context. Procedia Eng 171:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khameneh AH, Taheri A, Ershadi M (2016) Offering a framework for evaluating the performance of project risk management system. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 226:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chou JS, Pramudawardhani D (2015) Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects. Int J Project Manage 33(5):1136–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan F, Rathnayaka S, Ahmed S (2015) Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future. Process Saf Environ Prot 98:116–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Eduardo Gomes Salgado, Fábio Henrique dos Anjos, Vinicius Nogueira da Silva, Maik de Souza, Tomás Dias Sant’Ana & Lucas Cezar Mendonça

  2. University of Brasília / Head of the Research & Development Center for Excellence and Transformation of the Public Sector (NEXT), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil

    Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo

  3. Ministry of Education, Distrito Federal, Brazil

    Iara Ferreira Pinheiro

Authors
  1. Eduardo Gomes Salgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fábio Henrique dos Anjos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinicius Nogueira da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maik de Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tomás Dias Sant’Ana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lucas Cezar Mendonça
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Iara Ferreira Pinheiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eduardo Gomes Salgado , Fábio Henrique dos Anjos , Tomás Dias Sant’Ana , Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo or Lucas Cezar Mendonça .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, London, UK

    Xin-She Yang

  2. University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Simon Sherratt

  3. Department of Information Technology, Techno India College of Technology, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    Nilanjan Dey

  4. Sabar Institute of Technology, Sabarkantha, Gujarat, India

    Amit Joshi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Salgado, E.G. et al. (2019). Systematic Literature Review of the Risk Management Process Literature for the Public Sector. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 797. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1164-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1165-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation