Abstract
The paper examines whether there is a convergence of per capita consumption, and state domestic product across the various states of India. We use a set of panel unit root tests including ones that are robust to cross-sectional dependence. We find that although there is some evidence in favor of convergence in per capita consumption, the state domestic products in per capita terms of the Indian states exhibit non-convergence for all the tests. But there are certain state groups that exhibit intra-group convergence for all the variables considered for all the tests. The results indicate exacerbating overall inter-state inequality prospects on one hand, and a bunching of the states in terms of the overall economic performance on the other.
The authors are grateful to an anonymous referee for insightful and constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability and investment. European Economic Review, 81(5), 1170–1189.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476–487.
Bajpai, N., & Sachs, J. (1996). Trends in inter-state inequalities of income in India. Development Discussion Paper No. 528, HID, Harvard University.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(20), 223–251.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: what the long-run data show. American Economic Review, 76(5), 1075–1085.
Benhabib, J., & Rustichini, A. (1996). Social conflict and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1), 129–146.
Bernard, A. B., & Durlauf, S. N. (1995). Convergence of international output. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 97–108.
Bose, A. (2010). Headcount: Memoirs of a demographer. India: Penguin Books.
Breitung, J., & Das, S. (2005). Panel unit root tests under cross sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica, 52, 1–20.
Cashin, P., & Sahay, R. (1996). Internal migration, centre-state grants, and economic growth in the states of India. IMF Staff Paper, 43(1), 123–171.
Chowdhury, K. (2003). Empirics for world income distribution: What does the World Bank data reveal? Journal of Development Areas, 36(2), 59–83.
Dasgupta, D., Maiti, P., Mukherjee, R., Sarkar, S., & Chakrabarty, S. (2000). Growth and Interstate Disparities in India. Economic and Political Weekly, July 1, 2413–2422.
Evans, P., & Karras, G. (1996). Convergence revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 249–265.
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, S. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.
Kim, J. H. (1999). Spurious correlation between ratios with a common divisor. Statistics and Probability Letters, 44, 383–386.
Lanjouw, J., & Lanjouw, P. (2001). How to compare apples and oranges: Poverty measurement based on different definitions of consumption. Review of Income and Wealth, 47(1), 25–42.
Levin, A., Lin, C., & Chu, C. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.
Lipton, M., & Ravallion, M. (1995). Poverty and Policy. In J. Behrman & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 3B, pp. 2551–2557). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.
Marjit, S., & Mitra S. (1996). Convergence in regional growth rates: Indian research agenda. Economic and Political Weekly, August 17, 31, 33, 2239–2242.
Nagaraj, R., Varoudakis, A., & Veganzones, M. A. (1997). Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian states. Mumbai: Mimeo, IGIDR.
O’Connell, P. (1998). The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics, 44, 1–19.
Pearson, K. (1897). On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proceedings of Royal Society of London Series A, 60, 489–498.
Raman, J. (1996). Convergence or uneven development: a note on regional development in India. Indiana: Mimeo, Valparaiso University.
Temple, J. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 112–156.
Wei, Y. D., & Kim, S. (2002). widening inter-county inequality in Jiangsu Province, China, 1950–1995. Journal of Development Studies, 38(6), 142–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Santra, S., Das, S. (2018). Do We Share the Same Destiny? An Empirical Study on the Convergence of Growth Among Indian States. In: Dasgupta, R. (eds) Advances in Growth Curve and Structural Equation Modeling. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0980-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0980-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0979-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0980-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)