Abstract
Over decades, the design philosophy of framed structures had undergone changes from the ordinary gravity load-designed frames to special moment-resisting frames with ductility detailing. Most of the older buildings were designed only for gravity loads. The past earthquakes produced devastating damages to the gravity load-designed structures. This resulted in the remarkable changes in the seismic design philosophy in the form of introducing ductility detailing in the codes of practices. Different codes of practices, namely EURO, ACI, NZ, IS codes, prescribe appropriate detailing practices so as to ensure desired seismic performance. Hence, in the present study, an attempt is made to compare the seismic performance of gravity load designed, seismic load designed without ductility detailing, seismic load designed with ductility detailing which represent the evolution of design philosophies adopted in codes of practices. An exterior beam-column sub-assemblage of typical three-story building is taken up for the study and designed according to the evolution of design philosophies of Indian standard. Experimental investigations are carried out on beam-column sub-assemblages designed according to different evolution stages of design philosophy. The seismic performance of beam-column sub-assemblages of three different design levels, under reverse cyclic loading, is compared in terms of the hysteretic behavior and energy dissipation capacity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Megget LM, Park R (1971) Reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joints under seismic loading. NZ Eng 26(11):341–353
Park R, Paulay T (1973) Behaviour of reinforced concrete external beam column joints under cyclic loading. In: Proceedings, fifth world conference on earthquake engineering paper 88, vol 1, Session 2D, Rome, June 1973, pp. 772–781
Blakeley RWG, Megget LM, Priestley MJN (1975) Seismic performance of two full size reinforced concrete beam-column joint units. Bull N Z Nat Soc Earthquake Eng 8(1):38–69
Paulay T, Park R, Priestley MJN (1978) Reinforced concrete beam column joints under seismic actions. J Am Concr Inst Proc 75(11):585–593
Park R, Keong YS (1979) Tests on structural concrete beam-column joints with intermediate column bars. Bull N Z Nat Soc Earthquake Eng 12(3):2361–2376
Paulay T, Scarpas A (1981) The behaviour of exterior beam-column joints. Bull N Z Nat soc Earthquake Eng 14(3):131–144
Ehsani MR, Wight JK (1985) Exterior reinforced concrete beam to column connections subjected to Earthquake–type loading. ACI J 492–499
Aycardi LE, Mander JB, Reinhorn AM (1994) Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed only for gravity loads: experimental performance of sub assemblages. ACI Struct J 91(5):552–563
Murty CVR, Rai DC, Bajpai KK, Jain SK (2003) Effectiveness of reinforcement details in exterior reinforced concrete beam-column joints for earthquake resistance. ACI Struct J 100(2):149–156
Dhakal RP, Pan TC, Irawan P, Tsai KC, Lin KC, Chen CH (2005) Experimental study on the dynamic response of gravity-designed reinforced concrete connections. Eng Struct 27(1):75–87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kanchana Devi, A., Ramanjaneyulu, K. (2019). Seismic Behavior of Beam-Column Sub-assemblages Designed According to Different Evolution Stages of Design Philosophies. In: Rao, A., Ramanjaneyulu, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 2. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0365-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0365-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0364-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0365-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)