Skip to main content

Durability and In Situ Performance Evaluation of Sustainable Recycled Aggregate Concrete Using Fluorogypsum as Cementitious Binder

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 1

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 11))

  • 1721 Accesses

Abstract

Enormous industrialization and urbanization have led to the generation of huge quantity of C&D waste, which requires its appropriate utilization or disposal. Keeping these in eyes, construction sector is focusing on sustainable waste management regulations nowadays. Thus, the sustainable future green cities can be possible only by using low-carbon resources, eco-friendly materials and through energy conservation techniques. The goal of this study was to evaluate the durability and in situ performances of concrete made with recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) using fluorogypsum as cementitious binder to replace the cement partially (25%). This leads to a new perspective for achieving green concrete. The quality of RCA and the influence of the replacement ratio were assessed on several parameters such as chloride ion penetration, carbonation and water absorption resistance. The in situ parameters such as ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and rebound hammer number reflected the same behaviour with replacement percentage level of RCA. The UPV values of more than 3600 m/s, showed good-quality concrete. Though, RCA is having potentially inferior quality than natural aggregate (NA), it could be used to produce a structural grade concrete of strength more than 40 MPa. The results with fluorogypsum binder (FB) revealed that though it is having its own binder property, it could not achieve strength up to that with cement replacement. Rather, it can be used as a filling material or as an additive to improve its performance by making its matrix denser.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maullick, A. K. (2016). Viable alternatives to natural fine and coarse aggregate in concrete. In Proceedings of International Seminar on Emerging Building Materials and Construction Technologies, March 2016, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Malhotra, V. M., & Mehta, P. K. (2008). High performance high-volume fly ash concrete for building sustainable and durable structures (3rd ed.). Supplementary Cementing Materials for Sustainable Developments, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Etxeberria, M., Vázquez, E., Marí, A., & Barra, M. (2007). Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 37(5), 735–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Behera, M., Bhattacharyya, S. K., Minocha, A. K., Deoliya, R., & Maiti, S. (2014). Recycled aggregate from C&D waste & its use in concrete—A breakthrough towards sustainability in construction sector: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 68, 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nixon, P. (1978). Recycled concrete as an aggregate for concrete-a review. Materials and Structures, 11(5), 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen, T. C., & Narud, H. (1993). Strength of recycled concrete made from crushed concrete coarse aggregate. Concrete International, 5(1), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sagoe-Crentsil, K. K., Brown, T., & Taylor, A. H. (2001). Performance of concrete made with commercially produced coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(5), 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, T. C. (1996). RILEM REPORT 6. Recycling of demolished concrete and masonry. Bodmin, UK: E&FN Spon1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dhir, R. K., & Jappy, T. G. (Eds.). (1999). Proceedings of the International Conference on Exploiting Wastes in Concrete. UK: Thomas Telford.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olorunsogo, F. T., & Padayachee, N. (2002). Performance of recycled aggregate concrete monitored by durability indexes. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(2), 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui, Z. L., Yang, L. H., & Ohaga, Y. (2006). Durability test investigation on the recycled aggregate concrete. Science Technology and Engineering, 6(21), 3516–3519.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levy, S. M., & Helene, P. (2004). Durability of recycled aggregates concrete: A safe way to sustainable development. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(11), 1975–1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Otsuki, N., Miyazato, S., & Yodsudjai, W. (2003). Influence of recycled aggregate on interfacial transition zone, strength, chloride penetration and carbonation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 15(5), 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kou, S. C., & Poon, C. S. (2012). Enhancing the durability properties of concrete prepared with coarse recycled aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh, M., & Garg, M. (1999). Cementitious binder from fly ash and other industrial wastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(3), 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, C. M., & Wang, Y. (2007). Optimization on proportion for recycled aggregate in concrete using two-stage mixing approach. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 1928–1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM C 642-06. (2002). Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. West Conshohocken, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monalisa Behera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Behera, M., Minocha, A.K., Bhattacharyya, S.K., Deoliya, R. (2019). Durability and In Situ Performance Evaluation of Sustainable Recycled Aggregate Concrete Using Fluorogypsum as Cementitious Binder. In: Rao, A., Ramanjaneyulu, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 1. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 11. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0362-3_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0362-3_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0361-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0362-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics