Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Public Participation in Water Resources Management in Australia: Procedure and Possibilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming Water Law and Governance

Abstract

Broad public participation in water resources management is necessitated by strong public good qualities. Nevertheless, it is only a relatively recent phenomenon in Australia. Government and commercial/industrial hegemony over water resources is predominant. The procedural vehicles for public participation in Australian water governance have been consultation and litigation. Both exhibit limitations. Consultation represents an administrative and discretionary approach to involvement; flexible, widely used, but lacking in policy direction and sophistication. This chapter discusses consultation as a method of participation generally as well as in the specific circumstances of Aboriginal engagement. Adjudicative approaches benefit from an established model of judicial practice, including reasoned outcomes and methods of inquiry, but are infrequently used in Australia, whether in civil litigation or in administrative decision-making. Each procedural framework presents possible pathways to widen community engagement in management of water as a crucial public resource. Lessons from the Australia experience of public participation in water governance are identified across both consultative and adjudicative modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Administrative Review Council. (1995). Better decisions: Review of commonwealth merits review tribunals. Report no. 39. Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, M., & Groves, M. (2013). Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 5th ed. Lawbook Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barelli, M. (2012). Free, prior and informed consent in the aftermath of the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People: development and challenges ahead. International Journal of Human Rights, 16, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckingsdale, D., & Hind, J. (2010). Towards deliberation and dialectic: the community engagement process for the northern region sustainable water strategy: Final report. http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/188774/NRSWS_engagement_process_sm.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2016.

  • Behrendt, J., & Thompson, P. (2004). The recognition and protection of Aboriginal interests in NSW rivers. Journal of Indigenous Policy, 3, 37–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, B. (2003). Water tenure reform: developing an extended ladder of participation. Paper presented at Politics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practices RCSD Conference, July 11–14, 2003, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG (2004). Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens, B. (2016). Water law reform in the face of climate change: learning from drought in Australia and the Western United States. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 33, 372–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranney, K., & Tan, P. (2011). Old knowledge in freshwater: why traditional ecological knowledge is essential for determining environmental flows in water plans. Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, 14, 71–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrette, M. (2008). Indigenous legal rights to fresh water: Australia in the international context. Working Paper 42, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ANU, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (2000). Water Law. Thompson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, G. (1984). Natural Justice: Principles and Practical Application (2nd ed). Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L. (1978). The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92, 353–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, D. (1996). Due process and fair procedures: A study of administrative procedures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A., Bartlett, R., & Gray, J. (2009). Water Resources Law. LexisNexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., & Lee, L. (2016). National Water Initiative styled water entitlements as property: legal and practical perspectives. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 33, 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. (1995). Empowering the public: Information strategies and environment protection. In N. Gunningham, J. Norberry, & S. McKillop (Eds.), Environmental Crime: Proceedings of a Conference Held 1–3 September 1993, Hobart. Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunton, T., & Day, J. C. (2003). The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management. Environments, 31, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, A. (2009). The australian environment act: Report of the independent review of the environment protection and biodiversity conservation act 1999. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, S., & Rigney, D. (2014). Indigenous engagement in environmental water planning, research and management: Innovations in South Australia’s murray-darling basin region. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 14/21, Adelaide, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C. (2010). Public participation, environmental law and new governance: lessons for designing inclusive and representative participatory processes. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 27, 360–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C. (2015). Crafting collaborative governance: Water resources, california’s delta plan, and audited self-management in New Zealand. Environmental Law Reporter, 45, 10324–10337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C., & Sinclair, D. (2012). Compliance and enforcement of water licences in NSW: Limitations in law, policy and institutions. Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, 15, 149–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C., & Sinclair, D. (2013). Deliberative democracy, environmental law and collaborative governance: Insights from surface and groundwater studies. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C., & Sinclair, D. (2014). A new water policy options for Australia? Collaborative water governance, compliance and enforcement and audited self-management. Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, 17, 189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C., Gunningham, N. & Shearing, C. (2012). The New Environmental Governance. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., & Barber, M. (2013). Recognition of indigenous water values in Australia’s northern territory: Current progress and ongoing challenges for social justice in water planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 14, 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Tan, P.-L., & Altman, J. (2009). Indigenous freshwater planning forum: Proceedings, outcomes and recommendations. National Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Tan, P.-L., Mooney, C., Hoverman, S., & White, I. (2012). Principles and guidelines for good practice in indigenous engagement in water planning. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukensmeyer, C., Goldman, J., & Stern, D. (2011). Assessing public participation in an open government era: A review of federal agency plans. IBM Centre for the Business of Government. http://www.govexec.com/pdfs/082211jm1.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2011.

  • MacDonnell, L. (2015). Rethinking the use of general stream adjudications. Wyoming Law Review, 15, 347–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, S. (2015). Enhancing access to the courts to improve western Australia’s water resources. Australian Environment Review, 30, 136–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, V. (2014). A web of aboriginal water rights: examining the competing aboriginal claim for water property rights and interests in Australia. PhD dissertation, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., & Williams, J. (2014). Science hubris and insufficient legal safeguards. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 31, 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, K. (2013). Aboriginal title in Canada: site-specific or territorial? Law on the Edge Conference, Canadian Law and Society Association/Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand, 1–4 July 2013, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/all_papers/19.

  • McNeil, K. (2015). Indigenous territorial rights in the common law. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Paper 173. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/olsrps/173.

  • MDBA. (2013). Handbook for practitioners: water resource plan requirements.

    Google Scholar 

  • MLDRIN. (2009). Echuca Declaration. http://www.savanna.org.au/nailsma/publications/downloads/MLDRIN-NBAN-ECHUCA-DECLARATION-2009.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2017.

  • Morgan, M., Strelein, L., & Weir, J. (2004). Indigenous rights to water in the murray darling basin: In support of the indigenous final report to the living murray initiative. Australian Insitute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra, ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudd, M. B. (2013). Hitching our wagon to a dim star: Why outmoded water codes and ‘public interest’ review cannot protect the public trust in western water law. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 32, 283–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Water Commission. (2011). NWI biennial assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Water Commission. (2014). Australia’s water blueprint: National reform assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (2007). Groundwater dependent ecosystems in law: troubled waters? Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 10, 99–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orszag, P. (2009). Open government initiative. Memorandum. Office of Management and Budget, Dec 8, 2009, https://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive. Accessed 15 Jan 2017.

  • Preston, B. (2006). The role of public interest environmental litigation. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 23, 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, C. (2012). Water reform and the right for indigenous Australians to be engaged. Journal of Indigenous Policy, 12, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sossin, L. (2010). The duty to consult and accommodate: procedural justice and as Aboriginal rights. Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice, 23, 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stec, S. (2003). Handbook on access to justice under the aarhus convention. Szentendre, Hungary: Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckel, K., Webb, R., Woodward, L., & Hankinson, A. (2012). Australian water law. Thompson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P.-L. (2008). Collaborative water planning: legal and policy analysis (Vol. 3). Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge: Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P.-L., Baldwin, C., White, I., & Burry, K. (2012a). Water planning in the condamine alluvium, queensland: Sharing information and eliciting views in a context of overallocation. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P.-L., Bowmer, K., & Mackenzie, J. (2012b). Deliberative tools for meeting the challenges of water planning in Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P.-L., Bowmer, K., & Baldwin, C. (2012c). Continued challenges in the policy and legal framework for collaborative water planning. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. (2017). Public Participation Guide. https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/public-participation-guide. Accessed 15 Jan 2017.

  • USDA Forest Service. (2005). USDA Forests Service Sourcebook of State Groundwater Laws in 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, R. (2010). Costing the Earth? The Case for Public Interest Costs Protection in Environmental Litigation. Environment Defenders Office (Vic), Carlton, Victoria: The Case for Public Interests Costs Protection in Environmental Litigation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (2012). Australian freedom of information legislation v the aarhus convention: Is australia falling below international standards? Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, 15, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, N. (2014). Protective costs orders in Australia: Increasing access to courts by capping costs. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 31, 450–458.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Jusice Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Bruce Lindsay

Authors
  1. Bruce Lindsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Lindsay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Cameron Holley

  2. University of Canberra, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Darren Sinclair

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lindsay, B. (2018). Public Participation in Water Resources Management in Australia: Procedure and Possibilities. In: Holley, C., Sinclair, D. (eds) Reforming Water Law and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8977-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8977-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8976-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8977-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation